IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v82y2025ics096969892400420x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of price in display complexity's impact on horticultural plant purchase intention: An eye-tracking study

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jie
  • Behe, Bridget
  • Huddleston, Patricia
  • Thatcher, Scott

Abstract

Given that most live plants are still sold in physical stores, the influence of in-store display complexity on visual attention and purchase intention interests both practitioners and scholars. However, the interactive role of price and display complexity on choice has yet to be studied. Using Split-attention Effect in Cognitive Load Theory and Price-Quality Heuristic as theoretical frameworks, we conducted a within-subjects experiment using eye-tracking technology. We explored how price signs and display complexity affect visual attention and purchase intention. Prices were varied for two levels (regular vs. discounted) and display complexity was varied for 6, 12, and 24-item displays. Participants chose their most preferred option and indicated their purchase intention. Our study suggests that price moderates the Display Complexity (DC)-Likelihood-to-Buy (LTB) and Visual Attention on Sign (VAS) - LTB relationship. LTB increases with DC at a regular price, while LTB does not vary by DC at a discounted price. At a regular price, VAS is negatively related to LTB, while at a discounted price, VAS is positively associated with LTB. Implications for retailers include increasing the number of plants on display when no discount is offered and making regular price signs more appealing.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jie & Behe, Bridget & Huddleston, Patricia & Thatcher, Scott, 2025. "The role of price in display complexity's impact on horticultural plant purchase intention: An eye-tracking study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s096969892400420x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096969892400420X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104124?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham, Dan J. & Orquin, Jacob L. & Visschers, Vivianne H.M., 2012. "Eye tracking and nutrition label use: A review of the literature and recommendations for label enhancement," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 378-382.
    2. Huddleston, Patricia & Coveyou, Mary Tuski & Behe, Bridget K., 2023. "Visual cues during shoppers’ journeys: An exploratory paper," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Busemeyer, Jerome R. & Diederich, Adele, 2002. "Survey of decision field theory," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 345-370, July.
    4. Grebitus Carola & Roosen Jutta & Seitz Carolin Claudia, 2015. "Visual Attention and Choice: A Behavioral Economics Perspective on Food Decisions," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 73-81, January.
    5. Behe, Bridget K. & Bae, Mikyeung & Huddleston, Patricia T. & Sage, Lynnell, 2015. "The effect of involvement on visual attention and product choice," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 10-21.
    6. K. Carrie Armel & Aurelie Beaumel & Antonio Rangel, 2008. "Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 3, pages 396-403, June.
    7. Menon, R.G. Vishnu & Sigurdsson, Valdimar & Larsen, Nils Magne & Fagerstrøm, Asle & Foxall, Gordon R., 2016. "Consumer attention to price in social commerce: Eye tracking patterns in retail clothing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5008-5013.
    8. Pranay Verma, 2019. "The Vitality of Price Comparison and Product Display for Assortment Satisfaction: Online Footwear Purchase," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global, vol. 15(3), pages 51-68, July.
    9. Armel, K. Carrie & Beaumel, Aurelie & Rangel, Antonio, 2008. "Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(5), pages 396-403, June.
    10. Hsee, Christopher K., 1996. "The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 247-257, September.
    11. Huddleston, Patricia T. & Behe, Bridget K. & Driesener, Carl & Minahan, S., 2018. "Inside-outside: Using eye-tracking to investigate search-choice processes in the retail environment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 85-93.
    12. Chernev, Alexander, 2003. "When More Is Less and Less Is More: The Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 170-183, September.
    13. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i::p:396-403 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ellen J Van Loo & Carola Grebitus & Rodolfo M Nayga & Wim Verbeke & Jutta Roosen, 2018. "On the Measurement of Consumer Preferences and Food Choice Behavior: The Relation Between Visual Attention and Choices," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 538-562, December.
    2. Aaron Staples & Bridget K. Behe & Patricia Huddleston & Trey Malone, 2022. "What you see is what you get, and what you don't goes unsold: Choice overload and purchasing heuristics in a horticulture lab experiment," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(3), pages 620-635, July.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0240179 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Orquin, Jacob L. & Bagger, Martin P. & Lahm, Erik S. & Grunert, Klaus G. & Scholderer, Joachim, 2020. "The visual ecology of product packaging and its effects on consumer attention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 187-195.
    5. Gonzalez-Vallejo, Claudia & Reid, Aaron A., 2006. "Quantifying persuasion effects on choice with the decision threshold of the stochastic choice model," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 250-267, July.
    6. Huddleston, Patricia & Coveyou, Mary Tuski & Behe, Bridget K., 2023. "Visual cues during shoppers’ journeys: An exploratory paper," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Grebitus, Carola & Davis, George C., 2017. "Change is good!? Analyzing the relationship between attention and nutrition facts panel modifications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 119-130.
    8. Radon, Anita & Brannon, Daniel C. & Reardon, James, 2021. "Ketchup with your fries? Utilizing complementary product displays to transfer attention to a focal product," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    9. Felix Molter & Armin W Thomas & Scott A Huettel & Hauke R Heekeren & Peter N C Mohr, 2022. "Gaze-dependent evidence accumulation predicts multi-alternative risky choice behaviour," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-33, July.
    10. Sadowski, Sebastian & Fennis, Bob M. & van Ittersum, Koert, 2025. "All the cues we cannot see: How reward-driven distractors render consumers insensitive to assortment complexity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Carola Grebitus & Ellen J. Van Loo, 2022. "Relationship between cognitive and affective processes, and willingness to pay for pesticide‐free and GMO‐free labeling," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(3), pages 407-421, May.
    12. Van Loo, Ellen J. & Caputo, Vincenzina & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Seo, Han-Seok & Zhang, Baoyue & Verbeke, Wim, 2015. "Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 215-225.
    13. Man Ji & Yezheng Liu & Xiayu Chen, 2025. "An eye-tracking study on the role of attractiveness on consumers’ purchase intentions in e-commerce live streaming," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1485-1520, June.
    14. Ladeira, Wagner Junior & de Oliveira Santini, Fernando & Pinto, Diego Costa, 2022. "Clockwise versus counterclockwise turning bias: Moderation effects of foot traffic and cognitive experience on visual attention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Botti, Simona & Hsee, Christopher K., 2010. "Dazed and confused by choice: How the temporal costs of choice freedom lead to undesirable outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 161-171, July.
    16. Lucius Caviola & Nadira Faulmüller & Jim. A. C. Everett & Julian Savulescu & Guy Kahane, 2014. "The evaluability bias in charitable giving: Saving administration costs or saving lives?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 9(4), pages 303-315, July.
    17. Alexandra Rausch & Alexander Brauneis, 2015. "It’s about how the task is set: the inclusion–exclusion effect and accountability in preprocessing management information," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(2), pages 313-344, June.
    18. Moore, Don A., 1999. "Order Effects in Preference Judgments: Evidence for Context Dependence in the Generation of Preferences, ," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 146-165, May.
    19. Miguel Godinho de Matos & Pedro Ferreira, 2020. "The Effect of Binge-Watching on the Subscription of Video on Demand: Results from Randomized Experiments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1337-1360, December.
    20. Stefania Pighin & Lucia Savadori & Elisa Barilli & Rino Rumiati & Sara Bonalumi & Maurizio Ferrari & Laura Cremonesi, 2013. "Using Comparison Scenarios to Improve Prenatal Risk Communication," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(1), pages 48-58, January.
    21. Flores, Alvaro & Berbeglia, Gerardo & Van Hentenryck, Pascal, 2019. "Assortment optimization under the Sequential Multinomial Logit Model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1052-1064.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s096969892400420x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.