IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v120y2023ics0305048323000725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revelation mechanism and decoy strategy for a supply chain with consumer's perceived substitutability

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan, Yichao
  • Xiao, Tiaojun

Abstract

The decoy effect has been proven to be effective in simplifying choice and improving consumer outcomes in a regular choice context. This paper examines two decoy strategies in the presence of the consumer's perceived substitutability, namely decoy low-quality product strategy in a mixed bundling (strategy DL) and decoy high-quality product strategy in a mixed bundling (strategy DH). The manufacturer offers a menu of contracts to induce the retailer to report the information truthfully and choose one of the decoy strategies. Under symmetric information, we find that: (i) if the unit production cost of a high-quality product is low, the manufacturer and the retailer benefit more from strategy DL; otherwise, they benefit more from strategy DH. By investigating asymmetric scenario, we find that: (ii) under both strategies, the high-type retailer has no incentive to report wrong information while the low-type retailer may distort information, and both types of retailers have incentive to opt for a wrong strategy; (iii) under asymmetric information, the manufacturer is willing to design a menu of wholesale price-order quantity contracts to induce the retailer to report true information and opt for a correct strategy, and information asymmetry decreases the wholesale prices but increases the order quantities. Finally, we examine the impact of some key factors on the manufacturer's strategy choice and find that: (iv) if the high type consumer's perceived substitutability is low, the manufacturer will induce strategy DH; otherwise, the manufacturer will induce strategy DL; (v) when high-quality product's quality is high, the manufacturer will induce strategy DL if the probability of the low-type is low; otherwise, the manufacturer will induce strategy DH. When high-quality product's quality is low, the manufacturer benefits more from strategy DH.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan, Yichao & Xiao, Tiaojun, 2023. "Revelation mechanism and decoy strategy for a supply chain with consumer's perceived substitutability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:120:y:2023:i:c:s0305048323000725
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2023.102908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048323000725
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2023.102908?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabio Galeotti & Maria Montero & Anders Poulsen, 2022. "The Attraction and Compromise Effects in Bargaining: Experimental Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2987-3007, April.
    2. Yu, Yugang & Dong, Yuxuan & Guo, Xiaolong, 2018. "Pricing for sales and per-use rental services with vertical differentiation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 586-598.
    3. Heath, Timothy B & Chatterjee, Subimal & France, Karen Russo, 1995. "Mental Accounting and Changes in Price: The Frame Dependence of Reference Dependence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(1), pages 90-97, June.
    4. Yong Chao & Timothy Derdenger, 2013. "Mixed Bundling in Two-Sided Markets in the Presence of Installed Base Effects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(8), pages 1904-1926, August.
    5. Palsule-Desai, Omkar D. & Tirupati, Devanath & Shah, Janat, 2015. "Product line design and positioning using add-on services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 16-33.
    6. Richard Staelin, 2008. "Commentary—An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical Integration: Twenty-Five Years Later," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 111-114, 01-02.
    7. Carey K Morewedge & Meng Zhu & Eva C Buechel & Vicki G Morwitz & Linda L Price & Andrea C Morales, 2019. "Hedonic Contrast Effects Are Larger When Comparisons Are Social," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(2), pages 286-306.
    8. Myerson, Roger B, 1979. "Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(1), pages 61-73, January.
    9. Qi Feng & Guoming Lai & Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu, 2015. "Dynamic Bargaining in a Supply Chain with Asymmetric Demand Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 301-315, February.
    10. Osman Alp & Alper Şen, 2021. "Delegation of Stocking Decisions Under Asymmetric Demand Information," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 55-69, 1-2.
    11. Hemant K. Bhargava, 2012. "Retailer-Driven Product Bundling in a Distribution Channel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1014-1021, November.
    12. Ma, Peng & Shang, Jennifer & Wang, Haiyan, 2017. "Enhancing corporate social responsibility: Contract design under information asymmetry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 19-30.
    13. Raj Echambadi & James D. Hess, 2007. "Mean-Centering Does Not Alleviate Collinearity Problems in Moderated Multiple Regression Models," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 438-445, 05-06.
    14. Greg Shaffer & Florian Zettelmeyer, 2004. "Advertising in a Distribution Channel," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 619-628, November.
    15. Raphael Thomadsen & Robert P. Rooderkerk & On Amir & Neeraj Arora & Bryan Bollinger & Karsten Hansen & Leslie John & Wendy Liu & Aner Sela & Vishal Singh & K. Sudhir & Wendy Wood, 2018. "How Context Affects Choice," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 5(1), pages 3-14, March.
    16. Chunhua Wu & Koray Cosguner, 2020. "Profiting from the Decoy Effect: A Case Study of an Online Diamond Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 974-995, September.
    17. Qingning Cao & Xianjun Geng & Kathryn E. Stecke & Jun Zhang, 2019. "Operational Role of Retail Bundling and Its Implications in a Supply Chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(8), pages 1903-1920, August.
    18. Güler, Kemal & Körpeoğlu, Evren & Şen, Alper, 2018. "Newsvendor competition under asymmetric cost information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 561-576.
    19. Ehsan Bolandifar & Tianjun Feng & Fuqiang Zhang, 2018. "Simple Contracts to Assure Supply Under Noncontractible Capacity and Asymmetric Cost Information," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 217-231, May.
    20. Koukova, Nevena T. & Kannan, P.K. & Ratchford, Brian T., 2008. "Product form bundling: Implications for marketing digital products," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 181-194.
    21. Sun, Huan & Wang, Haiyan & Steffensen, Sonja, 2022. "Mechanism design of multi-strategy health insurance plans under asymmetric information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    22. Li, Feng & Du, Timon C. & Wei, Ying, 2020. "Enhancing supply chain decisions with consumers’ behavioral factors: An illustration of decoy effect," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    23. Xiao, Yujie & Niu, Wenju & Zhang, Lianmin & Xue, Weili, 2023. "Store brand introduction in a dual-channel supply chain: The roles of quality differentiation and power structure," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    24. Ratneshwar, Srinivasan & Shocker, Allan D & Stewart, David W, 1987. "Toward Understanding the Attraction Effect: The Implications of Product Stimulus Meaningfulness and Familiarity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(4), pages 520-533, March.
    25. Quan Zheng & Xiajun Amy Pan & Janice E. Carrillo, 2019. "Probabilistic Selling for Vertically Differentiated Products with Salient Thinkers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 442-460, May.
    26. Derhami, Shahab & Montreuil, Benoit & Bau, Guilhem, 2021. "Assessing product availability in omnichannel retail networks in the presence of on-demand inventory transshipment and product substitution," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    27. Jin, Jim Y., 1995. "Innovation announcement with vertical differentiation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 399-408, December.
    28. Rick Antle & Peter Bogetoft, 2019. "Mix Stickiness Under Asymmetric Cost Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2787-2812, June.
    29. Tiaojun Xiao & Jing Shi, 2016. "Consumer returns reduction and information revelation mechanism for a supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(2), pages 661-681, May.
    30. Timothy W. McGuire & Richard Staelin, 2008. "An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical Integration," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 115-130, 01-02.
    31. Joseph Guiltinan, 2010. "Consumer durables replacement decision-making: An overview and research agenda," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 163-174, June.
    32. Xiao, Tiaojun & Yang, Danqin, 2009. "Risk sharing and information revelation mechanism of a one-manufacturer and one-retailer supply chain facing an integrated competitor," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(3), pages 1076-1085, August.
    33. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 1999. "Capacity Choice and Allocation: Strategic Behavior and Supply Chain Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(8), pages 1091-1108, August.
    34. Xue, Musen & Zhang, Jianxiong & Zhu, Guowei, 2020. "Quantity decision timing with spillover effect and asymmetric demand information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    35. Xia, Jing & Niu, Wenju, 2021. "Carbon-reducing contract design for a supply chain with environmental responsibility under asymmetric information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    36. Niu, Baozhuang & Chen, Lingyun & Wang, Jingmai, 2022. "Ad valorem tariff vs. specific tariff: Quality-differentiated e-tailers’ profitability and social welfare in cross-border e-commerce," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    37. Xiaolong Guo & Shengming Zheng & Yugang Yu & Fuqiang Zhang, 2021. "Optimal Bundling Strategy for a Retail Platform Under Agency Selling," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2273-2284, July.
    38. Huber, Joel & Payne, John W & Puto, Christopher, 1982. "Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(1), pages 90-98, June.
    39. Zhang, Jianxiong & Li, Sa & Zhang, Shichen & Dai, Rui, 2019. "Manufacturer encroachment with quality decision under asymmetric demand information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 217-236.
    40. Lusheng Shao & Xiaole Wu & Fuqiang Zhang, 2020. "Sourcing Competition under Cost Uncertainty and Information Asymmetry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 447-461, February.
    41. Enis Kayis & Feryal Erhun & Erica L. Plambeck, 2013. "Delegation vs. Control of Component Procurement Under Asymmetric Cost Information and Simple Contracts," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 45-56, April.
    42. P. K. Kannan & Barbara Kline Pope & Sanjay Jain, 2009. "—Pricing Digital Content Product Lines: A Model and Application for the National Academies Press," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 620-636, 07-08.
    43. William James Adams & Janet L. Yellen, 1976. "Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 90(3), pages 475-498.
    44. Dorothée Honhon & Xiajun Amy Pan, 2017. "Improving Profits by Bundling Vertically Differentiated Products," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(8), pages 1481-1497, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan, Yichao & Xiao, Tiaojun, 2022. "Retailer's decoy strategy versus consumers' reference price effect in a retailer-Stackelberg supply chain," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Quan Zheng & Xiajun Amy Pan & Asoo J. Vakharia, 2021. "Product Decoys: A Supply Chain Perspective," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 2858-2870, September.
    3. Tang, Yuanzhao & Perera, Sandun C. & Cao, Qingning & Ji, Xiang, 2023. "Supplier versus platform bundling: Optimal strategies under agency selling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Chunhua Wu & Koray Cosguner, 2020. "Profiting from the Decoy Effect: A Case Study of an Online Diamond Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 974-995, September.
    5. Chen, Ting & Shan, Feifei & Yang, Feng & Xu, Fengmei, 2023. "Online retailer bundling strategy in a dual-channel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Qingning Cao & Xianjun Geng & Jun Zhang, 2022. "Impact of channel structure on a manufacturer's bundling decision with an application to digital goods," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1679-1697, April.
    7. Nasim Mousavi & Panagiotis Adamopoulos & Jesse Bockstedt, 2023. "The Decoy Effect and Recommendation Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1533-1553, December.
    8. Xiaolong Guo & Shengming Zheng & Yugang Yu & Fuqiang Zhang, 2021. "Optimal Bundling Strategy for a Retail Platform Under Agency Selling," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2273-2284, July.
    9. Lee, Sunghee & Yoo, Shijin & Kim, Daeki, 2016. "When is servitization a profitable competitive strategy?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 43-53.
    10. Angelika Endres & Joachim Heinzel, 2019. "The Impact of Product Qualities on Downstream Bundling in a Distribution Channel," Working Papers CIE 127, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    11. Angelika Endres-Fröhlich & Joachim Heinzel, 2022. "The Impact of Product Qualities on Downstream Bundling in a Distribution Channel," Working Papers Dissertations 90, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    12. Guoming Lai & Yixuan Liu & Wenqiang Xiao, 2021. "International Taxation and Production Outsourcing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 402-418, February.
    13. Weihua Liu & Wanying Wei & Xiaoyu Yan & Di Wang, 2019. "Supply Contract Design with Asymmetric Corporate Social Responsibility Cost Information in Service Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Girju, Marina & Prasad, Ashutosh & Ratchford, Brian T., 2013. "Pure Components versus Pure Bundling in a Marketing Channel," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(4), pages 423-437.
    15. Kumar Padamwar, Pravesh & Kumar Kalakbandi, Vinay & Dawra, Jagrook, 2023. "Deliberation does not make the attraction effect disappear: The role of induced cognitive reflection," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Vithala R. Rao & Gary J. Russell & Hemant Bhargava & Alan Cooke & Tim Derdenger & Hwang Kim & Nanda Kumar & Irwin Levin & Yu Ma & Nitin Mehta & John Pracejus & R. Venkatesh, 2018. "Emerging Trends in Product Bundling: Investigating Consumer Choice and Firm Behavior," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 5(1), pages 107-120, March.
    17. Lusheng Shao & Xiaole Wu & Fuqiang Zhang, 2020. "Sourcing Competition under Cost Uncertainty and Information Asymmetry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 447-461, February.
    18. Tiaojun Xiao & Jing Shi, 2016. "Consumer returns reduction and information revelation mechanism for a supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(2), pages 661-681, May.
    19. Zhou, Shu & Song, Boqian & Gavirneni, Srinagesh, 2020. "Bundling decisions in a two-product duopoly – Lead or follow?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 980-989.
    20. Joachim Heinzel, 2019. "Bundling in a Distribution Channel with Retail Competition," Working Papers CIE 120, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:120:y:2023:i:c:s0305048323000725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.