IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeeman/v123y2024ics0095069623001225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuel economy standards: Regulatory loopholes and firms’ heterogeneous responses

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Jingwen
  • Zhang, Tong
  • Liao, Hua

Abstract

Fuel economy standards have been implemented worldwide to improve the fuel efficiency of vehicles for decades, while the attribute-based design provides regulatory loopholes for automakers' compliance. Based on vehicle model-level data, a bunching analysis is used to explore automakers' responses to the weight-based and stepped fuel economy standards in China. Bunching responses are found at regulatory thresholds while exhibiting significant heterogeneity across automaker types. About 10% of vehicle models and 16% of sales of local brands have excess bunching at notches, while imported and joint-venture vehicles show fewer bunching effects. The regulatory loopholes not only induce weight increase but also bias automakers' technological inputs in fuel efficiency, leading to a larger “rebound effect” in fuel consumption; however, this effect has been weakened due to automakers' heterogeneous responses. The revised linear policy since 2021 is expected to reduce automakers’ manipulation behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Jingwen & Zhang, Tong & Liao, Hua, 2024. "Fuel economy standards: Regulatory loopholes and firms’ heterogeneous responses," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:123:y:2024:i:c:s0095069623001225
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069623001225
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:123:y:2024:i:c:s0095069623001225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622870 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.