IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v206y2026ics0148296325007374.html

Detesting evil: Why parent firms express hostility to resist employee entrepreneurs’ unethical behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Zeng, Kai
  • Wang, Duanxu
  • Xu, Yujing
  • Li, Zhengwei

Abstract

Employee entrepreneurs’ stealing from the parent firm where they were originally employed is a common phenomenon that has not traditionally been acknowledged as unethical behavior. Employee entrepreneurs’ unethical behavior (EEUB) not only causes economic losses to the parent firm but, more critically, constitutes a moral violation. Thus, parent firms tend to respond hostilely to EEUB. Drawing on deontic justice theory and the dual-process theory of moral judgment, this study conducted six investigations to examine the effect of EEUB on parent hostility, the underlying mechanisms, and the boundary conditions. Study 1, based on a survey of 646 employees, confirmed that EEUB triggers parent hostile attitude. Building on these findings, Study 2 implemented a scenario-based experiment involving 223 top executives to illustrate how EEUB prompts parent hostility. Finally, Study 3 conducted two surveys with 367 and 223 employee entrepreneurs respectively to test why and when EEUB provokes hostile behaviors in parent firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeng, Kai & Wang, Duanxu & Xu, Yujing & Li, Zhengwei, 2026. "Detesting evil: Why parent firms express hostility to resist employee entrepreneurs’ unethical behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325007374
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325007374
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0148296325007374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.