IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobuve/v23y2025ics235267342400057x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not all leavers are equal: How rank and destination influence enforcement of restrictive covenants

Author

Listed:
  • Yeganegi, Sepideh
  • Laplume, André O.
  • Bernard, Bradley

Abstract

Restrictive covenants like non-competes, non-solicitations, and non-disclosures may pose barriers to spinout ventures and mobility to competitors. However, we know little about the enforceability of these agreements despite their widespread use and associated chilling effects. Examining 332 Canadian court decisions, we find a higher rate of enforcement in cases involving high rank leavers (i.e., managers and owners) versus low rank leavers (regular employees and contractors) especially those who form spinout ventures. Our key insight is that enforcement rates differ significantly across different types of leavers. Low rank leavers and their previous employers may overestimate the potential for enforcement, creating chilling effects (i.e., where employees think they are more restricted by their employment agreements than they really are) that can deter employee mobility and entrepreneurship.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeganegi, Sepideh & Laplume, André O. & Bernard, Bradley, 2025. "Not all leavers are equal: How rank and destination influence enforcement of restrictive covenants," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:23:y:2025:i:c:s235267342400057x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235267342400057X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:23:y:2025:i:c:s235267342400057x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-business-venturing-insights .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.