IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v118y2020icp321-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The road to consumer forgiveness is paved with money or apology? The roles of empathy and power in service recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Wei, Chuang
  • Liu, Maggie Wenjing
  • Keh, Hean Tat

Abstract

Following service failure, there are two main forms of recovery—economic recovery and emotional recovery. Nonetheless, prior research has not examined the differential effects of these two forms of service recovery on consumer forgiveness nor their underlying mechanisms. The authors propose that the efficacy of each recovery strategy is mediated by consumer empathy toward the firm, which is neglected in service research. The main effect is moderated by consumers’ power state, particularly their perceived power against firms. Results of four studies in two countries (i.e., a field experiment, a lab experiment, and two online experiments) show that emotional recovery, compared to economic recovery, is more effective at eliciting both consumer empathy and forgiveness toward the firm. In addition, high-power consumers exhibit forgiveness through the serial mediation effects of perceived fairness and empathy, while low-power consumers show forgiveness through empathy alone. These findings have significant theoretical and practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei, Chuang & Liu, Maggie Wenjing & Keh, Hean Tat, 2020. "The road to consumer forgiveness is paved with money or apology? The roles of empathy and power in service recovery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 321-334.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:118:y:2020:i:c:p:321-334
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320304343
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fehr, Ryan & Gelfand, Michele J., 2010. "When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims' self-construals facilitates forgiveness," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 37-50, September.
    2. David Dubois & Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2010. "The Accentuation Bias: Money Literally Looms Larger (and Sometimes Smaller) to the Powerless," Post-Print hal-00621067, HAL.
    3. Shahin Rasoulian & Yany Grégoire & Renaud Legoux & Sylvain Sénécal, 2017. "Service crisis recovery and firm performance: insights from information breach announcements," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 789-806, November.
    4. David Dubois & Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2010. "The Accentuation Bias: Money Literally Looms larger to the Powerless," Post-Print hal-00701816, HAL.
    5. Harrison-Walker, L. Jean, 2019. "The critical role of customer forgiveness in successful service recovery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 376-391.
    6. Abeler, Johannes & Calaki, Juljana & Andree, Kai & Basek, Christoph, 2010. "The power of apology," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 233-235, May.
      • Johannes Abeler & Juljana Calaki & Kai Andree & Christoph Basek, 2009. "The Power of Apology," Discussion Papers 2009-12, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    7. Lisa C Wan & Robert S WyerJr. & Vicki G Morwitz & Amna Kirmani & Valerie S Folkes, 2019. "The Influence of Incidental Similarity on Observers’ Causal Attributions and Reactions to a Service Failure," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(6), pages 1350-1368.
    8. Garbinsky, Emily N. & Klesse, Anne-Kathrin & Aaker, Jennifer, 2014. "Money in the Bank: Feeling Powerful Increases Saving," Research Papers 2146, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    9. David Dubois & Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2011. "Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others," Post-Print hal-00621230, HAL.
    10. Derek D. Rucker & David Dubois & Adam D. Galinsky, 2011. "Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(6), pages 1015-1029.
    11. Emily N. Garbinsky & Anne-Kathrin Klesse & Jennifer Aaker, 2014. "Money in the Bank: Feeling Powerful Increases Saving," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 610-623.
    12. Jens Hogreve & Nicola Bilstein & Leonhard Mandl, 2017. "Unveiling the recovery time zone of tolerance: when time matters in service recovery," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 866-883, November.
    13. Derek D. Rucker & Miao Hu & Adam D. Galinsky, 2014. "The Experience versus the Expectations of Power: A Recipe for Altering the Effects of Power on Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 381-396.
    14. Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky & David Dubois, 2012. "Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value," Post-Print hal-00724231, HAL.
    15. Casidy, Riza & Shin, Hyunju, 2015. "The effects of harm directions and service recovery strategies on customer forgiveness and negative word-of-mouth intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 103-112.
    16. Gardner, Meryl Paula, 1985. "Mood States and Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 281-300, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bozkurt, Sıddık & Welch, Emma & Gligor, David & Gligor, Nichole & Garg, Vipul & Gopalakrishna Pillai, Kishore, 2023. "Unpacking the experience of individuals engaging in incentivized false (and genuine) positive reviews: The impact on brand satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Martinez, Luisa M. & Pacheco, Natália & Ramos, Filipe R. & Bicho, Marta, 2023. "Would you try it again? Dual effects of customer mindfulness on service recovery," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Lei Huang, 2023. "A moderation of business misdeeds on corporate remedy strategies," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 21-31, March.
    4. Nika Meyer (née Mozafari) & Melanie Schwede & Maik Hammerschmidt & Welf Hermann Weiger, 2022. "Users taking the blame? How service failure, recovery, and robot design affect user attributions and retention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2491-2505, December.
    5. Azzam Rifi & Rania B. Mostafa, 2022. "Brand credibility and customer-based brand equity: a service recovery perspective," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Hyun-Kyung Choi & Sang-Soo Kim & Bum-Seok Kim, 2023. "Perceived Justice and Customer Loyalty in the Situation of Beauty Service Failure," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    7. Tao Zhang & Chao Feng & Hui Chen & Junjie Xian, 2022. "Calming the customers by AI: Investigating the role of chatbot acting-cute strategies in soothing negative customer emotions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2277-2292, December.
    8. Zengmao Yang & Jinlai Zhou & Hongjun Yang, 2023. "The Impact of AI’s Response Method on Service Recovery Satisfaction in the Context of Service Failure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Mathieu Lajante & David Remisch, 2023. "Frontline Employees’ Empathy in Service Recovery: a Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for the Future," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Honora, Andreawan & Chih, Wen-Hai & Wang, Kai-Yu, 2022. "Managing social media recovery: The important role of service recovery transparency in retaining customers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    11. Papadopoulou, Christina & Vardarsuyu, Merve & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2023. "Examining the relationships between brand authenticity, perceived value, and brand forgiveness: The role of cross-cultural happiness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Xu, Xing'an & Liu, Juan & Gursoy, Dogan, 2022. "Emotional intelligence similarity in service recovery," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    13. Paramita, Widya & Zulfa, Naila & Rostiani, Rokhima & Widyaningsih, Yulia A. & Sholihin, Mahfud, 2021. "Ethics support through rapport: Elaborating the impact of service provider rapport on ethical behaviour intention of the tourists," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Muhammad Mazhar & Muhammad Amir Nadeem & Haider Ali Abbasi & Umaima Tariq & Amin Jan & Rao Abdul Hannan Jaffar, 2022. "Reparation for Service Failure Through Service Recovery: An Assessment of Consumer Behaviour in an Online Shopping Context," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 13(1), pages 64-87, June.
    15. Koc, Erdogan & Hatipoglu, Sercan & Kivrak, Oguzhan & Celik, Cemal & Koc, Kaan, 2023. "Houston, we have a problem!: The use of ChatGPT in responding to customer complaints," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choi, Woo Jin & Park, JaeHong & Yoon, Ho-Jung, 2018. "Your gift choice for your boss versus your subordinate would not be the same: The interplay of power and giver-receiver role on consumers' gift preferences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-7.
    2. Mukherjee, Ashesh & Lee, Seung Yun & Burnham, Thomas, 2020. "The effect of others’ participation on charitable behavior: Moderating role of recipient resource scarcity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 213-228.
    3. Veronica L. Thomas & Kendra Fowler & Christina Saenger, 2020. "Celebrity influence on word of mouth: the interplay of power states and power expectations," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 105-120, March.
    4. Lu Yang & Yuhuang Zheng & Rui Chen, 2021. "Who has a cushion? The interactive effect of social exclusion and gender on fixed savings," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 1398-1415, December.
    5. Li Yan & Hean Tat Keh & Xiaoyu Wang, 2021. "Powering Sustainable Consumption: The Roles of Green Consumption Values and Power Distance Belief," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 499-516, March.
    6. Khalil, Mary & Khan, Saira & Septianto, Felix, 2020. "Effects of power and implicit theories on donation," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 98-107.
    7. Hwang, YooHee & Shin, Joongwon & Mattila, Anna S., 2018. "So private, yet so public: The impact of spatial distance, other diners, and power on solo dining experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 36-47.
    8. Danielle J Brick & Gràinne M Fitzsimons & Tanya L Chartrand & Gavan J Fitzsimons & Gita JoharEditor & Sharon ShavittAssociate Editor, 2018. "Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand Compatibility, Relationship Power, and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 991-1014.
    9. Xingbo Li & Shalini Sarin Jain & Yiqin Alicia Shen & Shailendra Pratap Jain, 2021. "Power and Message Framing: the Case of Comparative Advertising," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 8(1), pages 41-49, June.
    10. Paramita, Widya & Septianto, Felix & Winahjoe, Sari & Purwanto, B.M. & Candra, Ika Diyah, 2020. "Sharing is (not) caring? The interactive effects of power and psychological distance on tolerance of unethical behavior," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 42-49.
    11. Koo, Jayoung & Im, Hyunjoo, 2019. "Going up or down? Effects of power deprivation on luxury consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 443-449.
    12. Honora, Andreawan & Chih, Wen-Hai & Wang, Kai-Yu, 2022. "Managing social media recovery: The important role of service recovery transparency in retaining customers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Roy, Vivek & Vijay, T. Sai & Srivastava, Abhishek, 2022. "The distinctive agenda of service failure recovery in e-tailing: Criticality of logistical / non-logistical service failure typologies and e-tailing ethics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Wong, Jimmy & Newton, Joshua D. & Newton, Fiona J., 2014. "Effects of power and individual-level cultural orientation on preferences for volunteer tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 132-140.
    15. Wang, Wangshuai & Raghunathan, Rajagopal & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2022. "Powerlessness, variety-seeking, and the mediating role of need for autonomy," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 706-723.
    16. Yong Zhang & Jiayu Ao & Jiayue Deng, 2019. "The Influence of High–Low Power on Green Consumption: The Moderating Effect of Impression Management Motivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Wang, Yajin, 2022. "A conceptual framework of contemporary luxury consumption," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 788-803.
    18. Yufei Zhang & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Andrew S. Manikas & Abhi Bhattacharya, 2023. "To exploit or explore? The impact of crowdfunding project descriptions and backers’ power states on funding decisions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 444-462, March.
    19. Michael J. Barone & T. J. Bae & Shanshan Qian & Jason d’Mello, 2017. "Power and the appeal of the deal: how consumers value the control provided by Pay What You Want (PWYW) pricing," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 437-447, September.
    20. Jin, Fei & Zhu, Huawei & Tu, Ping, 2020. "How recipient group membership affects the effect of power states on prosocial behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 307-315.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:118:y:2020:i:c:p:321-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.