IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v45y2019i6p1350-1368..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Incidental Similarity on Observers’ Causal Attributions and Reactions to a Service Failure

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa C Wan
  • Robert S WyerJr.
  • Vicki G Morwitz
  • Amna Kirmani
  • Valerie S Folkes

Abstract

Observers’ reactions to a service failure and their attributions of responsibility for its occurrence can depend on fortuitous characteristics of the protagonists that happen to draw their attention. Four field and laboratory experiments show that when observers have an incidental similarity to one of the persons involved in a service failure (the customer or the service provider), their attention is drawn to this protagonist, often leading them to construe the situation from this person’s perspective and consequently to blame the protagonist less for the negative event they observe. However, when an incidentally similar protagonist is rude or has an undesirable personal characteristic (i.e., obesity), observers’ greater attention to that person increases their attributions of responsibility to him or her rather than decreasing it. These opposing effects of incidental similarity on attributions influence not only observers’ evaluations of the persons involved in the situation they observe, but also their willingness to patronize the establishment. These effects occur both when observers actually witness a conflict offline and when they consider it online on the basis of reviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa C Wan & Robert S WyerJr. & Vicki G Morwitz & Amna Kirmani & Valerie S Folkes, 2019. "The Influence of Incidental Similarity on Observers’ Causal Attributions and Reactions to a Service Failure," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(6), pages 1350-1368.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:45:y:2019:i:6:p:1350-1368.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucy050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chan, Elisa K. & Wan, Lisa C. & Yi, Xiao (Shannon), 2022. "Smart technology vs. embarrassed human: The inhibiting effect of anticipated technology embarrassment," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Mansur Khamitov & Yany Grégoire & Anshu Suri, 2020. "A systematic review of brand transgression, service failure recovery and product-harm crisis: integration and guiding insights," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 519-542, May.
    3. Alhouti, Sarah & Wright, Scott A. & Baker, Thomas L., 2021. "Customers need to relate: The conditional warm glow effect of CSR on negative customer experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 240-253.
    4. Xu, Xing'an & Liu, Juan & Gursoy, Dogan, 2022. "Emotional intelligence similarity in service recovery," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Barbarossa, Camilla & Buzeta, Cristian & De Pelsmacker, Patrick & Moons, Ingrid, 2022. "Foreign company misconduct and how consumers’ punitive intent is influenced by country stereotypes and the perceived similarity between the foreign country and the home country," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(5).
    6. Chen, Nuoya & Mohanty, Smaraki & Jiao, Jinfeng & Fan, Xiucheng, 2021. "To err is human: Tolerate humans instead of machines in service failure," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    7. Wei, Chuang & Liu, Maggie Wenjing & Keh, Hean Tat, 2020. "The road to consumer forgiveness is paved with money or apology? The roles of empathy and power in service recovery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 321-334.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:45:y:2019:i:6:p:1350-1368.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.