IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v112y2020icp531-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User self-disclosure on social network sites: A cross-cultural study on Facebook’s privacy concepts

Author

Listed:
  • Oghazi, Pejvak
  • Schultheiss, Rakel
  • Chirumalla, Koteshwar
  • Kalmer, Nicolas Philipp
  • Rad, Fakhreddin F.

Abstract

This study investigates a cross-cultural comparison between Germany and Norway regarding users’ self-disclosure of personal information on social network sites (SNSs). More specifically, the study considers three antecedents of privacy, namely concerns, attitudes, and intentions, and evaluates their potential effects on self-disclosure, considering Facebook as the SNS of choice. The study employs a deductive research approach and develops a conceptual model based on the theoretical analysis. Data is collected via an online survey of users in Germany and Norway. The results show that privacy intention is the only antecedent that has a significant direct influence on users' self-disclosure of information. By contrast, neither privacy concerns nor privacy attitude have a statistically significant influence on self-disclosure. Additionally, there are statistically significant differences between the German and Norwegian samples in privacy concepts and reported self-disclosure. The results support the creation of more transparent privacy policies by SNS providers to improve targeted marketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Oghazi, Pejvak & Schultheiss, Rakel & Chirumalla, Koteshwar & Kalmer, Nicolas Philipp & Rad, Fakhreddin F., 2020. "User self-disclosure on social network sites: A cross-cultural study on Facebook’s privacy concepts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 531-540.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:112:y:2020:i:c:p:531-540
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319307726
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessandro Acquisti & Curtis Taylor & Liad Wagman, 2016. "The Economics of Privacy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 442-492, June.
    2. Steven Brakman & Harry Garretsen & Abdella Oumer, 2014. "Town Twinning and German City Growth," CESifo Working Paper Series 4754, CESifo.
    3. Bertoli, Simone & Brücker, Herbert & Fernández-Huertas Moraga, Jesús, 2016. "The European crisis and migration to Germany," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 61-72.
    4. Steven Brakman & Harry Garretsen & Abdella Oumer, 2016. "Town Twinning and German City Growth," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(8), pages 1420-1432, August.
    5. Jentzsch, Nicola, 2016. "State-of-the-Art of the Economics of Cyber-Security and Privacy," EconStor Research Reports 126223, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    6. Simone Bertoli & Herbert BrÜcker & Jesús FernÁndez-Huertas Moraga, 2016. "The European crisis and migration to Germany," Post-Print halshs-01355040, HAL.
    7. Patrick Criqui & Mark Jaccard & Thomas Sterner, 2019. "Carbon Taxation: A Tale of Three Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(22), pages 1-1, November.
    8. Yin-Wong Cheung & Sven Steinkamp & Frank Westermann, 2019. "A tale of two surplus countries: China and Germany," CESifo Working Paper Series 7669, CESifo.
    9. repec:ces:ifodic:v:16:y:2019:i:4:p:50000000004810 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Bearden, William O. & Money, R. Bruce & Nevins, Jennifer L., 2006. "Multidimensional versus unidimensional measures in assessing national culture values: The Hofstede VSM 94 example," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 195-203, February.
    11. Tol, Richard S.J., 2019. "A social cost of carbon for (almost) every country," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 555-566.
    12. repec:ces:ifodic:v:13:y:2016:i:4:p:19191589 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. de Mendonça, Helder Ferreira & de Oliveira, Diego S.P., 2019. "Firms' confidence and Okun's law in OECD countries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 98-107.
    14. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    15. Joop Adema & Yvonne Giesing & Anne Schönauer & Tanja Stitteneder, 2019. "Minimum Wages Across Countries," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 16(04), pages 55-63, January.
    16. Elisabeth Sinnewe & Michael Kortt & Todd Steen & Colin Tyler, 2016. "Religion and earnings: evidence from Germany," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 43(8), pages 1-1, October.
    17. ., 2019. "The developing countries," Chapters, in: Global Political Economy, chapter 7, pages 110-128, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Aguirre, Elizabeth & Mahr, Dominik & Grewal, Dhruv & de Ruyter, Ko & Wetzels, Martin, 2015. "Unraveling the Personalization Paradox: The Effect of Information Collection and Trust-Building Strategies on Online Advertisement Effectiveness," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 34-49.
    19. Byrne, David & Parle, Conor, 2019. "Euro Area Slowdown - a Country-Sector Analysis," Quarterly Bulletin Articles, Central Bank of Ireland, pages 149-163, July.
    20. Sandra J. Milberg & H. Jeff Smith & Sandra J. Burke, 2000. "Information Privacy: Corporate Management and National Regulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 35-57, February.
    21. Yin-Wong Cheung & Sven Steinkamp & Frank Westermann, 2020. "A Tale of Two Surplus Countries: China and Germany," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 131-158, February.
    22. Hina & Javed Iqbal & Asia Baig & Muhammad Yusuf Amin, 2019. "Is Pakistan Really a Pollution Haven Country?," Review of Economics and Development Studies, CSRC Publishing, Center for Sustainability Research and Consultancy Pakistan, vol. 5(4), pages 741-754, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:112:y:2020:i:c:p:531-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Haili He). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.