IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v11y2000i1p35-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Privacy: Corporate Management and National Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra J. Milberg

    (McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Old North Hall, Washington, D.C., 20057)

  • H. Jeff Smith

    (Babcock Graduate School of Management, Wake Forest University, P.O. Box 7569, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27109)

  • Sandra J. Burke

    (Department of Marketing, Faculty of Economics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia NSW 2006)

Abstract

The 1990s have seen a resurgence of interest in information privacy. Public opinion surveys show that many citizens are becoming greatly concerned about threats to their information privacy, with levels of such concern reaching all-time highs. Perhaps as a response to the growing concerns of citizens, the media are devoting more attention to privacy issues, and governmental regulation of the corporate privacy environment is increasing in many countries. Almost all developed countries have grappled with the trade-offs between open access to information—which enables economic efficiency—and an individual's right to privacy. Consistent with these trade-offs, many recent incidents suggest that regulatory approaches to information privacy, corporate management of personal data, and consumer reactions are becoming tightly interwoven around the world. To provide some insights into these relationships, we develop a conceptual model and test it with a cross-cultural sample from 19 different countries.In general, we find that a country's regulatory approach to the corporate management of information privacy is affected by its cultural values and by individuals' information privacy concerns. In addition, as governments become more involved in the corporate management of information privacy, internal management of such issues seems to tighten. This result supports previous observations that most firms take a primarily reactive approach to managing privacy by waiting for an external threat before crafting cohesive policies that confront their information practices. Moreover, when corporations are not perceived to adequately manage information privacy issues, and/or when privacy concerns rise, individuals are more inclined to prefer government intervention and be distrustful of firm self-regulation. As such, citizens may look to lawmakers to enact stricter regulation to reduce their privacy concerns. These findings and several international trends suggest that the self-regulatory model of privacy governance may not be sustainable over the long term.Findings from this research constitute an important contribution to the emerging theoretical base of information privacy research and should be particularly enlightening to those managing information privacy issues. Several directions for future research are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra J. Milberg & H. Jeff Smith & Sandra J. Burke, 2000. "Information Privacy: Corporate Management and National Regulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 35-57, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:11:y:2000:i:1:p:35-57
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.11.1.35.12567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.1.35.12567
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.11.1.35.12567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mayhew, Glenn E & Winer, Russell S, 1992. "An Empirical Analysis of Internal and External Reference Prices Using Scanner Data," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(1), pages 62-70, June.
    2. Ross, William T, Jr & Creyer, Elizabeth H, 1992. "Making Inferences about Missing Information: The Effects of Existing Information," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(1), pages 14-25, June.
    3. Saeed Samiee, 1984. "Transnational Data Flow Constraints: A New Challenge for Multinational Corporations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 15(1), pages 141-150, March.
    4. Langlois, Catherine, 1993. "National character in corporate philosophies: How different is Japan?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 313-320, September.
    5. Catherine C Langlois & Bodo B Shlegemilch, 1990. "Do Corporate Codes of Ethics Reflect National Character? Evidence from Europe and the United States," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 21(4), pages 519-539, December.
    6. Michael J Kane & David A Ricks, 1988. "Is Transnational Data Flow Regulation a Problem?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 19(3), pages 477-482, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ewer, Sid R., 1996. "Perceptions of reliances placed on data transmission control measures: Global versus domestic-only private network usage," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 267-282, June.
    2. Biondi, Beatrice & Cornelsen, Laura & Mazzocchi, Mario & Smith, Richard, 2020. "Between preferences and references: Asymmetric price elasticities and the simulation of fiscal policies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 108-128.
    3. Mitzi Cubilla‐Montilla & Ana‐Belén Nieto‐Librero & Ma Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ma Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel‐María Garcia‐Sanchez, 2019. "Are cultural values sufficient to improve stakeholder engagement human and labour rights issues?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 938-955, July.
    4. Aki Tomizawa & Li Zhao & Geneviève Bassellier & David Ahlstrom, 2020. "Economic growth, innovation, institutions, and the Great Enrichment," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 7-31, March.
    5. Jana Kozáková & Mária Urbánová & Radovan Savov, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Extent of the Ethical Codes: Evidence from Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Priya Jha-Dang, 2006. "A Review of Psychological Research on Consumer Promotions and a New Perspective Based on Mental Accounting," Vision, , vol. 10(3), pages 35-43, July.
    7. Hood, Jacqueline N. & Logsdon, Jeanne M., 2002. "Business ethics in the NAFTA countries: A cross-cultural comparison," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 883-890, November.
    8. Hyeyoung Kim & Marisa Zansler & Lisa A. House, 2018. "Retail promotion with price cut and the imperfect price responses of orange juice demand in the U.S," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 363-376, March.
    9. Amir Hortamani & Azarnoosh Ansari & Mohtaram Akbari, 2013. "Studying Impact of price Satisfaction on Loyalty: a Case Study in Electric Generating Plant Snowa," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 3(4), pages 46-50, October.
    10. Calderón Reyes & Ferrero Ignacio & Redin Dulce M., 2013. "Ethical codes and corporate responsibility of the most admired companies of the world: Toward a third generation ethics?," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Ingo Winkler, 2011. "The Representation of Social Actors in Corporate Codes of Ethics. How Code Language Positions Internal Actors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(4), pages 653-665, July.
    12. repec:cup:judgdm:v:7:y:2012:i:2:p:196-204 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Wei, Wei & Kim, Gaeul & Miao, Li & Behnke, Carl & Almanza, Barbara, 2018. "Consumer inferences of corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims on packaged foods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 186-201.
    14. Forsyth, Donelson R. & O'Boyle Jr., Ernest H., 2011. "Rules, standards, and ethics: Relativism predicts cross-national differences in the codification of moral standards," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 353-361, June.
    15. Kwangpil Chang & S. Siddarth & Charles B. Weinberg, 1999. "The Impact of Heterogeneity in Purchase Timing and Price Responsiveness on Estimates of Sticker Shock Effects," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 178-192.
    16. Suzanne Fogel & Dan Lovallo & Carmina Caringal, 2004. "Loss Aversion for Quality in Consumer Choice," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 29(1), pages 45-63, June.
    17. Jang Singh, 2011. "Determinants of the Effectiveness of Corporate Codes of Ethics: An Empirical Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(3), pages 385-395, July.
    18. Kolk, Ans, 2016. "The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 23-34.
    19. repec:dgr:rugsom:99b35 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Greg Fischer & Dean Karlan & Margaret McConnell & Pia Raffler, 2014. "To Charge or Not to Charge: Evidence from a Health Products Experiment in Uganda," Working Papers 1041, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    21. Wei, Xiaohan & Chen, Xuqi & Gao, Zhifeng & Jensen, Kimberly L. & Yu, Tun-Hsiang & DeLong, Karen L., 2020. "The Reference Price Effect on Willingness-to-Pay Estimates: Evidence from Eco-labeled Food Products," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304573, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    22. Liu, Hsin-Hsien & Chou, Hsuan-Yi, 2015. "The effects of promotional frames of sales packages on perceived price increases and repurchase intentions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 23-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:11:y:2000:i:1:p:35-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.