IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v81y2024icp208-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the construction of Pilot Free Trade Zones promote the development of green economy? - A quasi-natural experiment evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yan, Xiaolei
  • He, Taiyi
  • Qian, Pengcheng
  • Liu, Zhongwen

Abstract

China has established Pilot Free Trade Zones (PFTZs) since 2013. However, there have been limited studies concerning the green economic effects of this policy. Given the uncertainties surrounding the relationship between this policy and regional green economic development, this paper employs a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) method to evaluate the impact of the PFTZ policy on local green economy efficiency (GEE) by using provincial-level data in China from 2009 to 2019. We yield that the construction of PFTZs significantly contributes to the positive growth of regional GEE. Subsequently, we conduct a series of robustness tests to ensure the credibility of this finding. In addition, Further findings demonstrate that technological progress and industrial structure upgrading are two critical channels in achieving this positive effect. Notably, we also find that the construction of PFTZs stimulate the dynamics of market mechanisms to promote green economic development. Interestingly, heterogeneity analysis results suggest that the PFTZ policy seems to be more positively embedded in southern China and regions with higher degrees of openness. Conclusively, our findings demonstrate the establishment of PFTZs effectively promotes local green economic development and provide empirical evidence that a profound opening-up pilot policy is less likely to transform China into a Pollution Haven.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan, Xiaolei & He, Taiyi & Qian, Pengcheng & Liu, Zhongwen, 2024. "Does the construction of Pilot Free Trade Zones promote the development of green economy? - A quasi-natural experiment evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 208-224.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:208-224
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592623003132
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:208-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.