IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Challenges in quantitative economic analysis in support of multilateral trade negotiations

Listed author(s):
  • Meilke, Karl D.
  • McClatchy, Don
  • Gorter, Harry de

A wide range of economic analysis of agricultural trade liberalization was performed prior to and during the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations. Views differ as to the effectiveness of this research, although most would agree that it became less relevant as the negotiations progressed. This paper reviews the contributions of economists to the trade liberalization debate, with an emphasis on the quantitative assessment of multilateral agricultural trade liberalization. With a new round of agricultural trade negotiations scheduled to begin in 1999 it is crucial that the quantitative work required to support these negotiations begin in the near future. The authors conclude that the Uruguay Round outcome provides numerous challenges and opportunities in analyzing the traditional agenda of agricultural trade liberalization. In addition, new issues will be added to the agenda of the next round of negotiations. These include: trade and the environment, competition policy and intellectual property rights. It is important that economists begin to develop a research agenda that can address these issues and become activists in addressing these topics in public forums.

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Blackwell in its journal Agricultural Economics.

Volume (Year): 14 (1996)
Issue (Month): 3 (August)
Pages: 185-200

in new window

Handle: RePEc:eee:agecon:v:14:y:1996:i:3:p:185-200
Contact details of provider: Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Tyers,Rod & Anderson,Kym, 2011. "Disarray in World Food Markets," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521172318, December.
  2. Meilke, Karl D. & Larue, Bruno, 1989. "A Quantitative Assessment of the Impact of Trade Liberalization on Canadian Agriculture," Working Papers 157499, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  3. Buckwell, Allan & Medland, John, 1991. "The effects of trade liberalisation : Problems of modelling the effects of liberalising agricultural trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2-3), pages 552-561, April.
  4. Meilke, Karl D. & Sarker, Rakhal, 1995. "National Administered Protection Agencies: Their Role in the Post-Uruguay Round World," 1995: Understanding Technical Barriers to Agricultural Trade Conference, December 1995, Tucson, Arizona 50714, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
  5. Tullock, Gordon, 1995. "The Political Economy of Administered Decisions: What We Might Hope For and What We Can Expect," 1995: Understanding Technical Barriers to Agricultural Trade Conference, December 1995, Tucson, Arizona 50699, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
  6. Romer, Paul, 1994. "New goods, old theory, and the welfare costs of trade restrictions," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 5-38, February.
  7. Josling, Timothy E. & Honma, Masayoshi & Lee, Jaeok & MacLaren, Donald & Miner, William M. & Sumner, Daniel A. & Tangermann, Stefan & Valdes, Alberto, 1994. "The Uruguay Round Agreement On Agriculture: An Evaluation," Commissioned Papers 14621, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
  8. Kozloff, Keith & Runge, C. Ford, 1991. "International Trade In The Food Sector And Environmental Quality, Health, And Safety: A Survey Of Policy Issues," Staff Papers 13325, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
  9. Helmar, Michael D. & Premakumar, V. & Oerter, Karen & Kruse, John & Smith, Darnell & Meyers, William H., 1994. "Impacts of the Uruguay Round on Agricultural Commodity Markets," Staff General Research Papers Archive 815, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  10. Giancarlo Moschini & Karl D. Meilke, 1991. "Tariffication with Supply Management: The Case of the U.S.-Canada Chicken Trade," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 39(1), pages 55-68, March.
  11. Bruce L. Gardner, 1993. "Reforming Agricultural Economists and What They Do," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 41(4), pages 383-386, December.
  12. Paul Krugman, 1992. "Does the New Trade Theory Require a New Trade Policy?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 423-442, July.
  13. Bhagwati, Jagdish, 1994. "Free Trade: Old and New Challenges," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 104(423), pages 231-246, March.
  14. Thomas W. Hertel, 1989. "PSEs and the Mix of Measures to Support Farm Incomes," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 17-28, March.
  15. Sharples, Jerry A., 1987. "Estimating the Gains from Less Distorted Agricultural Trade," Working Papers 51386, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
  16. de Gorter, Harry & Fisher, Eric O'N., 1993. "The Dynamic Effects Of Agricultural Subsidies In The United States," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(02), December.
  17. Hertel, Thomas W., 1990. "General Equilibrium Analysis of U.S. Agriculture: What Does It Contribute?," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, issue 3.
  18. Tyers, Rodney, 1990. "Searching Under The Light: The Neglect Of General Equilibrium, Dynamics And Risk In The Analysis Of Food Trade Reforms," Staff Papers 13845, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agecon:v:14:y:1996:i:3:p:185-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.