IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/van/wpaper/0027.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How New is the "New Trade Theory" of the Past Two Decades?

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Maneschi

    () (Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University)

Abstract

This paper looks at the paradigm of the past two decades that goes under the name of "new trade theory" or "new international economics", and rejects the assumptions underlying mainstream trade theory such as constant returns to scale and perfect competition. Authors contributing to it include Krugman, Dixit, Lancaster, Grossman, Helpman, Brander, Spencer and Ethier. After describing the main tenets of this new paradigm, Section 1 explores in greater depth the reasons for its birth. The new trade theory offers rationales for trade that often dispense altogether with the notion of comparative advantage, and new insights into the nature of the gains from trade. Section 2 examines its antecedents in the history of economic thought, which hark back to Adam Smith's productivity theory of trade according to which productivity rises when specialization is stimulated by a more extended market. Section 3 attempts to measure the "progress" which the new trade theory has achieved with respect to these classical antecedents, and studies its relation to the infant industry argument for protection popularized by J. S. Mill. Section 4 assesses the progress claimed by the new trade theorists with respect to the mainstream theory of trade. Section 5 draws some conclusions, and explores whether the theoretical advances of the new trade theory constitute a net advance over similar theories formulated in the classical period.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Maneschi, 2000. "How New is the "New Trade Theory" of the Past Two Decades?," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 0027, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:van:wpaper:0027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/VUECON/vu00-w27.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2000
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Spence, 1976. "Product Selection, Fixed Costs, and Monopolistic Competition," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 217-235.
    2. Jagdish Bhagwati, 1989. "Is free trade passé after all?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 125(1), pages 17-44, March.
    3. Kenneth E. Boulding, 1971. "After Samuelson, Who Needs Adam Smith?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 225-237, Fall.
    4. Filippo Cesarano, 1983. "On the role of the history of economic analysis," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 63-82, Spring.
    5. Baldwin, Robert E, 1969. "The Case against Infant-Industry Tariff Protection," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 77(3), pages 295-305, May/June.
    6. Raymond Vernon, 1966. "International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 80(2), pages 190-207.
    7. Terrence Bensel & Bruce Elmslie, 1992. "Rethinking international trade theory: a methodological appraisal," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 128(2), pages 249-265, June.
    8. Kenneth J. Arrow, 1962. "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(3), pages 155-173.
    9. Young, Allyn A., 1928. "Increasing Returns and Economic Progress," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 38, pages 527-542.
    10. Andrea Maneschi, 1998. "Comparative Advantage in International Trade," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 856, April.
    11. Frank D. Graham, 1923. "The Theory of International Values Re-examined," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 54-86.
    12. Walker, Donald A., 1999. "The Relevance for Present Economic Theory of Economic Theory Written in the Past," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(01), pages 7-26, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:van:wpaper:0027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John P. Conley). General contact details of provider: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/econ/wparchive/index.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.