IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/v15y2025i2id17328.html

Reassessing the Load Capacity Curve Hypothesis in ASEAN-5: Exploring Energy Intensity, Trade, and Financial Inclusion with Advanced Econometric Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Kurniawati, Tri

    (Department of Economics Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, West Sumatera, 25171, Indonesia)

  • Rahmizal, Maizul

    (Department of Economics, Universitas Negeri Padang, West Sumatera, 25171, Indonesia)

  • Ridwan, Mohammad

    (Department of Economics, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Sonapur, Noakhali, 3814, Bangladesh)

  • Aspy, Nazhat Nury

    (Department of Economics, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Sonapur, Noakhali, 3814, Bangladesh)

  • Mahjabin, Tasfia

    (Department of Economics, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Sonapur, Noakhali, 3814, Bangladesh)

  • Eleais, Md.

    (Department of Economics, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Sonapur, Noakhali, 3814, Bangladesh)

  • Ridzuan, Abdul Rahim

    (Institute for Big Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, 40450, Malaysia; & Faculty of Business and Management, Puncak Alam Campus, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300, Puncak Alam, Malaysia; & Centre for Economic Development and Policy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia; & Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, 40450, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study investigates how economic growth, energy intensity, financial inclusion, and trade globalization impact the load capacity factor in the ASEAN-5 region. Using data from 2000 to 2022 from reputable databases, the study analyzed the load capacity curve (LCC) hypothesis through comprehensive statistical analysis. Several diagnostic tests, such as cross-sectional dependence, slope homogeneity, unit root, and cointegration, to select a suitable long-run estimation model were conducted. The study utilized the Driscoll-Kraay standard error (DKSE) approach to address identified issues like cross-sectional dependence, heterogeneity, and unit root problems. DKSE estimation showed that the LCC hypothesis was not present in the ASEAN-5 region. It is worth noting that an inverted-U-shaped relationship between per capita income and the load capacity factor was found, emphasizing the complexity of economic dynamics in the region. Furthermore, the analysis revealed a strong correlation between energy intensity and the load capacity factor, with trade globalization having a significant negative effect. Surprisingly, financial inclusion did not show a significant correlation with the load capacity factor, highlighting the intricate role of financial accessibility in economic performance. To enhance the strength of the DKSE estimation, the study also utilized quantile regression analysis, which supported the results of the DKSE approach. The study confirmed that the LCC hypothesis is not applicable in the ASEAN-5 region and offered a more detailed analysis of the varying effects of energy intensity and trade globalization at different levels. Conclusively, this study provides valuable insights into the complex relationships among economic growth, energy intensity, financial inclusion, and trade globalization in the ASEAN-5 region. A thorough analytical approach enhances comprehension of sustainable development and economic resilience in the region, guiding policy decisions and future research efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurniawati, Tri & Rahmizal, Maizul & Ridwan, Mohammad & Aspy, Nazhat Nury & Mahjabin, Tasfia & Eleais, Md. & Ridzuan, Abdul Rahim, 2025. "Reassessing the Load Capacity Curve Hypothesis in ASEAN-5: Exploring Energy Intensity, Trade, and Financial Inclusion with Advanced Econometric Techniques," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 15(2), pages 195-208, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:2:id:17328
    DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.17328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/17328/8596
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32479/ijeep.17328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:2:id:17328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.