IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scandj/v99y1997i4p497-518.html

Collusion and Renegotiation in a Principal–Supervisor–Agent Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Roland Strausz

Abstract

We describe a principal–supervisor–agent relationship in which agent and supervisor may collude. To prevent collusion, the principal may contract on a noisy signal which is correlated with the occurrence of collusion. When the signal is informative enough, the principal uses it and no collusion occurs in equilibrium. These contracts, however, are ex post inefficient and are only optimal if the principal can commit not to renegotiate. With renegotiation it is never optimal for the principal to prevent collusion and, at the same time, condition contracts on the signal. In fact, when the signal is informative enough collusion occurs in equilibrium.

Suggested Citation

  • Roland Strausz, 1997. "Collusion and Renegotiation in a Principal–Supervisor–Agent Relationship," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(4), pages 497-518, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:scandj:v:99:y:1997:i:4:p:497-518
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9442.00078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00078
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9442.00078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucia Marchegiani & Tommaso Reggiani & Matteo Rizzolli, 2013. "Severity vs. Leniency Bias in Performance Appraisal: Experimental evidence," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS01, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    2. Fahad Khalil & Jacques Lawarrée, 2006. "Incentives For Corruptible Auditors In The Absence Of Commitment," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 269-291, June.
    3. William A. Wagstaff, 2019. "Organizing evaluation: Assessing combat leadership quality," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 31(2), pages 132-155, April.
    4. Nobuo Yoshida, 2000. "The Optimal Combination of Corruption Reforms: Is a Comprehensive Approach a Good Idea?," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1335, Econometric Society.
    5. Marchegiani, Lucia & Reggiani, Tommaso & Rizzolli, Matteo, 2016. "Loss averse agents and lenient supervisors in performance appraisal," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 131(PA), pages 183-197.
    6. Fahad Khalil & Jacques Lawarrée & Sungho Yun, 2007. "Bribery vs. Extortion: Allowing the Lesser of two Evils," CESifo Working Paper Series 1993, CESifo.
    7. Jellal, Mohamed, 2012. "An anti corruption mechansim," MPRA Paper 38647, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Minggao Shen & Jikun Huang & Linxiu Zhang & Scott Rozelle, 2010. "Financial reform and transition in China: a study of the evolution of banks in rural China," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(3), pages 305-332, November.
    9. Jellal, Mohamed, 2009. "Darke Side of Social Capital Social Preferences and Corruption," MPRA Paper 17179, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Hiriart, Yolande & Martimort, David & Pouyet, Jerome, 2010. "The public management of risk: Separating ex ante and ex post monitors," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(11-12), pages 1008-1019, December.
    11. S. Bolatto & L. Lambertini, 2017. "Collusive Vertical Relations," Working Papers wp1103, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    12. Lambsdorff, Johann, 2001. "How corruption in government affects public welfare: A review of theory," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 9, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    13. Toshiki Miyashita & Takao Takasago, 2026. "The threat of sabotage and collusion in tournaments," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Eskeland, Gunnar S. & Thiele, Henrik, 1999. "Corruption under moral hazard," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2204, The World Bank.
    15. Xiao, Ling & Ge, Chao & Luo, Zhenghan & Zhang, Weidong & Chen, Zihuang, 2024. "How partial nationalizations affect technological innovation in mixed-ownership enterprises: A theoretical explanation based on the effects of heterogeneous shareholder governance and resource acquisition," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    16. Jellal, Mohamed, 2014. "Social structure bureaucracy and corruptionA," MPRA Paper 57177, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. R. Strausz, 1995. "Collusion and Renegotiation in a Principal-Supervisor-Agent- Relationship (REVISION)," Game Theory and Information 9510002, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 03 Apr 1996.
    18. Lindenthal, Sabine, 2000. "Der Einfluss der Organisationsstruktur auf die Leistungskontrolle," Quint-Essenzen 62, University of Trier, Institute for Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Community (IAAEG).
    19. Dam, Kaniṣka & Roy Chowdhury, Prabal, 2021. "Monitoring and incentives under multiple-bank lending: The role of collusive threats," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    20. Li Chen & Shiqing Yao & Kaijie Zhu, 2020. "Responsible Sourcing Under Supplier-Auditor Collusion," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1234-1250, November.
    21. Osipian, Ararat, 2008. "The World is Flat: Modeling Educators’ Misconduct with Cellular Automata," MPRA Paper 7592, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    22. Fahad Khalil & Jacques Lawarrée & Sungho Yun, 2010. "Bribery versus extortion: allowing the lesser of two evils," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 41(1), pages 179-198, March.
    23. Alexander Henke & Fahad Khalil & Jacques Lawarree, 2022. "Honest agents in a corrupt equilibrium," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 762-783, August.
    24. Dominique Demougin & Benjamin Bental, 2025. "Procedural vs. Substantive Approaches in Non-Comprehensive Contracts," CESifo Working Paper Series 11861, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scandj:v:99:y:1997:i:4:p:497-518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9442 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.