IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Der Einfluss der Organisationsstruktur auf die Leistungskontrolle

Listed author(s):
  • Lindenthal, Sabine
Registered author(s):

    Im Rahmen eines dreistufigen Prinzipal-Agenten-Modells wird betrachtet, wie die Organisationsstruktur sowohl die individuellen Kontrollanreize als auch die Kontrollleistung insgesamt beeinflusst. Es zeigt sich, dass unter bestimmten Bedingungen ein Einliniensystem nicht nur hinsichtlich der individuellen Kontrollanreize, sondern auch der Kontrollleistung insgesamt einem Mehrliniensystem überlegen sein kann. Dies mag umso überraschender sein, da letzteres ein differenzierteres Karrieresystems ermöglicht und dort eine Wettbewerbssituation zwischen den Kontrollinstanzen besteht. Zur Bestimmung der bezüglich der Kontrolleffizienz optimalen Organisationsform, wird der mit der verbesserten Kontrolle verbundene Nutzengewinn des Prinzipal den hiermit verbundenen Kosten gegenübergestellt. Der Nutzengewinn ergibt sich aus dem Einfluss der Kontrolle auf das Verhalten des Agenten. Als Ergebnis werden u.a. Bedingungen für die Vorteilhaftigkeit der verschiedenen System formuliert.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Trier, Institute for Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Community (IAAEG) in its series Quint-Essenzen with number 62.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2000
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:iaaegq:62
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Campus II, D-54286 Trier

    Phone: +49+651/201-4741
    Fax: +49+651/201-4742
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Jean-Jacques Laffont & David Martimort, 1999. "Separation of Regulators Against Collusive Behavior," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 30(2), pages 232-262, Summer.
    2. Fahad Khalil, 1997. "Auditing Without Commitment," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 28(4), pages 629-640, Winter.
    3. Strausz, Roland, 1997. " Collusion and Renegotiation in a Principal-Supervisor-Agent Relationship," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(4), pages 497-518, December.
    4. Kofman, Fred & Lawarree, Jacques, 1993. "Collusion in Hierarchical Agency," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 629-656, May.
    5. Kofman, Fred & Lawarree, Jacques, 1996. "On the optimality of allowing collusion," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 383-407, September.
    6. Tirole, Jean, 1986. "Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations," Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 181-214, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iaaegq:62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.