IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/199044.html

Determinants of Consumer Attitudes and Purchasing Behaviors on Genetically Modified Foods in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Tongyang
  • Ames, Glenn C.W.
  • Berning, Joshua

Abstract

Consumers have been concerned about the introduction of genetically modified (GM) foods into Taiwan. This study examines the public’s attitude toward GM foods in Taiwan using data obtained in a nationwide telephone interview in January 2004. Logit regression was used to measure the relative importance of consumers’ socio-demographic characteristics, personal beliefs, and awareness of genetically modified foods which may impact their purchasing behavior, as well as consumers’ willingness to pay a premium for non-GM foods. Results show that the perceived risk of GM foods and technology, previous knowledge about genetic engineering, and higher education levels were significant determinants of consumers’ willingness to purchase non-GM foods versus GM foods. Moreover, on average, Taiwanese consumers were willing to spend 19% more to avoid purchasing GM foods.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Tongyang & Ames, Glenn C.W. & Berning, Joshua, 2015. "Determinants of Consumer Attitudes and Purchasing Behaviors on Genetically Modified Foods in Taiwan," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 46(01), pages 1-7, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:199044
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.199044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/199044/files/_5_%20Yang.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.199044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Zhigang & Mao, Yanna & Gale, Fred, 2008. "Chinese consumer demand for food safety attributes in milk products," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 27-36, February.
    2. James O. Bukenya & Natasha R. Wright, 2007. "Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified tomatoes," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 117-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Todua Nugzar & Gogitidze Teona & Phutkaradze Jaba, 2015. "Georgian Consumer Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Products," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 46(1), pages 120-133, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Leilei & Yin, Changbin & Chien, Hsiaoping, 2015. "Demand for milk quantity and safety in urban China: evidence from Beijing and Harbin," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(2), April.
    2. Owusu, Rebecca & Dadzie, Samuel Kwesi Ndzebah, . "Heterogeneity in consumer preferences for organic and genetically modified food products in Ghana," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 16(2).
    3. Ding, Jiping & Moustier, Paule & Ma, Xindong & Huo, Xuexi & Jia, Xiangping, "undated". "Doing But Not Knowing: How Apple Farmers Comply With Standards In China," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260897, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Anaka Aiyar & Prabhu Pingali, 2020. "Pandemics and food systems - towards a proactive food safety approach to disease prevention & management," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(4), pages 749-756, August.
    5. Wei Yang & Alan Renwick & Waranan Tantiwat & Cesar Revoredo‐Giha & Dafeng Wu, 2021. "Food product launch and positioning in China—Do claims of credence attributes matter?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4), pages 915-926, October.
    6. Pei Xu & Zhigang Wang, 2014. "Country of origin and willingness to pay for pistachios: a chinese case," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Vidyahwati Tenrisanna & Mohammad Mafizur Rahman & Rasheda Khanam, 2016. "Factors Affecting Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Imported Offal in Indonesia: A Case Study for Makassar City," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 15(2), pages 145-159, December.
    8. repec:plo:pone00:0195817 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Rosenbaum, Mark S. & Cheng, Mingming & Wong, Ipkin Anthony, 2016. "Retail knockoffs: Consumer acceptance and rejection of inauthentic retailers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2448-2455.
    10. Sarasty, Oscar & Amin, Modhurima & Badruddoza, Syed, 2022. "Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural commodity prices," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322240, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Wang, Erpeng & Gao, Zhifeng & Heng, Yan & Shi, Lijia, 2019. "Chinese consumers’ preferences for food quality test/measurement indicators and cues of milk powder: A case of Zhengzhou, China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Yuquan Chen & Xiaohua Yu, 2022. "Estimating market power for the Chinese fluid milk market with imported products," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 386-401, April.
    13. Xiaohui Liu & Shuru Zhong, 2024. "Unsettling wildness: seafood consumption in new materialism," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(4), pages 1741-1753, December.
    14. Shi Zheng & Pei Xu & Zhigang Wang & Shunfeng Song, 2012. "Willingness to pay for traceable pork: evidence from Beijing, China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(2), pages 200-215, May.
    15. Joseph Seong & Simone Valle de Souza & H. Christopher Peterson, 2023. "Seeds of Industry Sustainability: Consumer Attitudes towards Indoor Agriculture Benefits versus Its Advanced Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Agyekum Michael & Jolly Curtis M. & Thompson Henry, 2018. "Aflatoxins and Health Considerations in Consumer Food Choices in Ghana," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, November.
    17. Waldron, Scott & Brown, Colin & Longworth, John, 2010. "A critique of high-value supply chains as a means of modernising agriculture in China: The case of the beef industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 479-487, October.
    18. Kumar, Anjani & Thapa, Ganesh & Joshi, Pramod Kumar & Roy, Devesh, 2016. "Adoption of food safety measures among Nepalese milk producers: Do smallholders benefit?," IFPRI discussion papers 1556, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. Zhou, Li & Turvey, Calum & Hu, Wuyang & Ying, Ruiyao, 2015. "Fear and Trust: How Risk Perceptions of Avian Influenza Affect the Demand for Chicken," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 202077, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Chen, Lijun & Parcell, Joe L & Chen, Chao & James, Harvey S. Jr & Xu, Danning, "undated". "Consumer preference for supermarket food sampling in China," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236043, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    21. Ding, Yulian & Veeman, Michele, 2015. "Effectiveness of quality signalling: brand versus certification," 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy 202711, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:199044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.