Bargaining over Sons and Daughters: Child Labor, School Attendance and Intra-Household Gender Bias in Brazil
In this paper we examine intra-household gender differences and the incidence of child labor and childrenï¿½s school attendance in Brazil to test whether the unitary model of household allocations is suitable in the child labor context. We begin by building an intra-household allocation model where fathers and mothers may affect the education investment and the child labor participation of their sons and daughters differently due to differences in the children's human capital technologies and/or differences in parental preferences. Using the 1996 Brazilian Household Survey, we estimate the impact of a parentï¿½s education, non-labor income and child labor experience on the labor market status and school attendance of their sons and daughters separately. We find that, for childrenï¿½s labor status, the fatherï¿½s education, non-labor income and the age at which he first began working in the labor market has a greater impact on the labor status of sons than of daughters, while the opposite is true for motherï¿½s education, non-labor income and the age at which she first began working in the labor market, which have a greater impact on the labor status of daughters than of sons. In addition, when it comes to schooling decisions, both fathers and mothers education and non-labor income appear to have a greater positive impact on sons than on daughters.
|Date of creation:||May 2002|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/econ/wparchive/index.html|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:van:wpaper:0213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John P. Conley)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.