IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Should delegation contracts be made before or after union wage setting? Endogenous moves in a managerial-unionized duopoly

Listed author(s):
  • Nicola Meccheri


    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Italy; The Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis, Italy)

  • Luciano Fanti


    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Italy)

This paper analyzes a multiple-stage game in which, at the final stage, two (managerial) firms compete over quantities in the product market. Prior to this stage, firm-specific unions set the workers' wages, while the owners of both firms hire managers and provide them with incentive contracts in order to affect their output decisions. Owners can freely decide to arrange the managerial contract before or after the (non-managerial) wage determination stage. Hence, the endogenous choice of the incentive contract stage is derived. The possibility of multiple (sub-game perfect) equilibria arises, where both owners choose managerial contracts before or after unions' wage setting, crucially depending on unions' preferences. In particular, owners may prefer, quite counter-intuitively, to choose the managerial contract after union wage setting when unions are neither extremely oriented towards employment, nor sufficiently oriented towards wages.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by The Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis in its series Working Paper Series with number 16-18.

in new window

Date of creation: Jul 2016
Handle: RePEc:rim:rimwps:16-18
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Via Patara, 3, 47921 Rimini (RN)

Phone: +390541434142
Fax: +39054155431
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rim:rimwps:16-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marco Savioli)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.