IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/119196.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do trade frictions distort the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis? A closer look

Author

Listed:
  • Bonga-Bonga, Lumengo

Abstract

This paper explores whether trade frictions are the primary barrier preventing the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) hypothesis from holding true between trading nations. It specifically examines the influence of exchange controls, a form of trade friction, on the relationship between an emerging economy, South Africa, and its primary trading partners, categorized based on whether they implement exchange control regulations or not. The methodology employed incorporates nonlinearity through quantile unit root tests and quantile cointegration, aiming to account for diverse economic conditions between trading nations. Empirical results suggest that the PPP hypothesis is more valid between countries with similar economic frameworks and synchronized business cycles. We propose that trade frictions might not necessarily inhibit the PPP hypothesis from being valid among nations with aligned economic structures that react similarly to global economic disturbances.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonga-Bonga, Lumengo, 2023. "Do trade frictions distort the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis? A closer look," MPRA Paper 119196, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:119196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/119196/1/MPRA_paper_119196.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allegret, Jean-Pierre & Mignon, Valérie & Sallenave, Audrey, 2015. "Oil price shocks and global imbalances: Lessons from a model with trade and financial interdependencies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 232-247.
    2. Hongfeng Peng & Zhijie Liu & Tsangyao Chang, 2017. "Revisiting purchasing power parity in BRICS countries using more powerful quantile unit-root tests with stationary covariates," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(20), pages 10051-10057, October.
    3. Karadimitropoulou, Aikaterini, 2018. "Advanced economies and emerging markets: Dissecting the drivers of business cycle synchronization," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 115-130.
    4. Lumengo Bonga-Bonga, 2019. "Fiscal policy, monetary policy and external imbalances: Cross-country evidence from Africa's three largest economies," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 123-136, February.
    5. Alan M. Taylor & Mark P. Taylor, 2004. "The Purchasing Power Parity Debate," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(4), pages 135-158, Fall.
    6. Seneshaw Tamru & Bart Minten & Johan Swinnen, 2021. "Trade, value chains, and rent distribution with foreign exchange controls: Coffee exports in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(1), pages 81-95, January.
    7. Ayhan Kose, M. & Otrok, Christopher & Whiteman, Charles H., 2008. "Understanding the evolution of world business cycles," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 110-130, May.
    8. Xiao, Zhijie, 2009. "Quantile cointegrating regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 150(2), pages 248-260, June.
    9. Nagayasu, Jun, 2021. "Causal and frequency analyses of purchasing power parity," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Engle, Robert & Granger, Clive, 2015. "Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 39(3), pages 106-135.
    11. Chang, Yoosoon, 2002. "Nonlinear IV unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 261-292, October.
    12. Peter Pedroni, 2001. "Purchasing Power Parity Tests In Cointegrated Panels," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(4), pages 727-731, November.
    13. Omoshoro-Jones, Oyeyinka S. & Bonga-Bonga, Lumengo, 2021. "Global imbalances, external adjustment and propagated shocks: An African perspective from a global VAR model," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 186-203.
    14. Faudot, Adrien & Ponsot, Jean-François, 2016. "The Dollar Dominance : Recent Episode of Trade Invoicing and Debt Issuance," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 31(1), pages 41-64.
    15. Alan M. Taylor & Mark P. Taylor, 2004. "The Purchasing Power Parity Debate," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(4), pages 135-158, Fall.
    16. Bernd Schnatz, 2011. "Global Imbalances And The Pretence Of Knowing Fundamental Equilibrium Exchange Rates," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 604-615, December.
    17. Robertson, Raymond & Kumar, Anil & Dutkowsky, Donald H., 2014. "Weak-form and strong-form purchasing power parity between the US and Mexico: A panel cointegration investigation," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 241-262.
    18. Yoon, Jong Cheol & Min, Dai Hong & Jei, Sang Young, 2020. "Purchasing power parity vs. uncovered interest rate parity for NAFTA countries: The value of incorporating time-varying parameter model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 494-500.
    19. Alba, Joseph D. & Papell, David H., 2007. "Purchasing power parity and country characteristics: Evidence from panel data tests," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 240-251, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hendriks, Johannes Jurgens & Bonga-Bonga, Lumengo, 2022. "Testing for the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis between South Africa and its main trading partners: application of the quantile approach," MPRA Paper 112915, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Ma, Wei & Li, Haiqi & Park, Sung Y., 2017. "Empirical conditional quantile test for purchasing power parity: Evidence from East Asian countries," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 211-222.
    3. Jerry Coakley & Stuart Snaith, 2006. "Testing for symmetry and proportionality in a European panel," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1-2), pages 63-71.
    4. Robertson, Raymond & Kumar, Anil & Dutkowsky, Donald H., 2014. "Weak-form and strong-form purchasing power parity between the US and Mexico: A panel cointegration investigation," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 241-262.
    5. Mohsen Bahmani‐Oskooee & Scott W. Hegerty, 2009. "Purchasing Power Parity In Less‐Developed And Transition Economies: A Review Paper," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(4), pages 617-658, September.
    6. Roni Frish, 2016. "The Real Exchange Rate in the Long Term," Bank of Israel Working Papers 2016.03, Bank of Israel.
    7. Mario Cerrato & Nicholas Sarantis, 2007. "Does purchasing power parity hold in emerging markets? Evidence from a panel of black market exchange rates," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(4), pages 427-444.
    8. Levent, Korap, 2007. "Modeling purchasing power parity using co-integration: evidence from Turkey," MPRA Paper 19584, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Gürkaynak, Refet S. & Kısacıkoğlu, Burçin & Lee, Sang Seok, 2022. "Exchange rate and inflation under weak monetary policy: Turkey verifies theory," CFS Working Paper Series 679, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    10. Franses, Ph.H.B.F. & van Dijk, D.J.C., 2002. "A simple test for PPP among traded goods," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2002-02, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    11. Georgios Chortareas & George Kapetanios, 2013. "How Puzzling Is The Ppp Puzzle? An Alternative Half‐Life Measure Of Convergence To Ppp," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 435-457, April.
    12. Ricky Chee Jiun Chia & Shiok Ye Lim & Sheue Li Ong, 2014. "Long-Run Validity of Purchasing Power Parity and Cointegration Analysis for Low Income African Countries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(3), pages 1438-1447.
    13. Cushman, David O. & Michael, Nils, 2011. "Nonlinear trends in real exchange rates: A panel unit root test approach," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1619-1637.
    14. Saadet Kasman & Adnan Kasman & Duygu Ayhan, 2010. "Testing the Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis for the New Member and Candidate Countries of the European Union: Evidence from Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Tests with Structural Breaks," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 53-65, March.
    15. Sarno, Lucio & Valente, Giorgio, 2006. "Deviations from purchasing power parity under different exchange rate regimes: Do they revert and, if so, how?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 3147-3169, November.
    16. Breitung, Jörg & Pesaran, Mohammad Hashem, 2005. "Unit roots and cointegration in panels," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2005,42, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    17. Abdullah Noman, 2008. "Testing for PPP in the mean-group panel rgression framework: further evidence," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 6(20), pages 1-12.
    18. Jaunky, Vishal Chandr, 2012. "Is there a material Kuznets curve for aluminium? evidence from rich countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 296-307.
    19. Mohsen Bahmani Oskooee & Magda Kandil, 2007. "Real and nominal effective exchange rates in MENA countries: 1970-2004," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(19), pages 2489-2501.
    20. Zeynel Abidin Ozdemir, 2007. "The purchasing power parity hypothesis in Turkey: evidence from nonlinear STAR error correction models," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 307-311.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    PPP hypothesis; quantile cointegration; unit root test; exchange control.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F3 - International Economics - - International Finance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:119196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.