IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pai/wpaper/08-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

¿Qué explica el rendimiento académico en el primer año de estudios universitarios? Un estudio de caso en la Universidad del Pacífico

Author

Listed:
  • Arlette Beltrán Barco

    (Universidad del Pacífico)

  • Karlos La Serna Studzinski

    (Universidad del Pacífico)

Abstract

Las universidades se encuentran en la actualidad en una etapa de transición que es resultado de una serie de tendencias internacionales, entre las que destaca la masificación de la enseñanza. A pesar de esta situación, en el Perú, no se han realizado investigaciones que expliquen, el rendimiento académico en la enseñanza superior sobre la base de aquellas variables no pedagógicas que la investigación educativa ha identificado como relevantes: las académicas, las psicológicas, las socio-familiares y las de identificación. En ese sentido, lo que se busca con el presente estudio es identificar y explicar los principales determinantes del rendimiento de los ingresantes a la Universidad del Pacífico (UP) durante su primer año de estudios. La hipótesis principal es que mejores indicadores en las variables académicas, relacionados con el rendimiento escolar y las características del colegio de procedencia, aumentan la probabilidad de obtener buenos resultados académicos al finalizar los dos primeros ciclos de estudios en la UP. A partir de la información obtenida para la cohorte de alumnos de la UP que ingresó en el año 2006, se estimaron dos modelos para explicar el rendimiento académico, para lo cual se utilizó el método de Mínimos Cuadrados Ordinarios. La variable dependiente del primero midió el promedio ponderado que acumuló el alumno luego de haber cursado sus dos primeros ciclos, mientras que la del segundo consideró el número de créditos acumulados por él luego de haber finalizado el mismo período. El hecho de que el nivel de aptitud numérica y la calificación promedio en matemáticas durante los últimos tres años de educación secundaria sean variables significativas en ambos modelos, da pie a concluir que la profundidad del aprendizaje matemático y el desarrollo de habilidades para el razonamiento numérico son de especial importancia para alcanzar un buen rendimiento y un mayor avance en la UP. Las variables socio-económicas sólo han sido importantes para dar cuenta del avance del alumno y no generan muchas diferencias respecto del rendimiento final. De otro lado, las variables relacionadas con los estilos de aprendizaje fueron las grandes ausentes en ambos modelos, lo cual posibilita rechazar la hipótesis de que puedan tener una influencia específica sobre el rendimiento del alumno de la UP durante su primer año de estudios.

Suggested Citation

  • Arlette Beltrán Barco & Karlos La Serna Studzinski, 2008. "¿Qué explica el rendimiento académico en el primer año de estudios universitarios? Un estudio de caso en la Universidad del Pacífico," Working Papers 08-09, Centro de Investigación, Universidad del Pacífico.
  • Handle: RePEc:pai:wpaper:08-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.up.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/11354/342/DD0809.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    File Function: Application/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcos Gallacher, 2005. "Predicting Academic Performance," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 312, Universidad del CEMA.
    2. Ronald W. Crowley & David A. Wilton, 1974. "An Analysis of 'Learning' in Introductory Economics," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 7(4), pages 665-673, November.
    3. Mary O'Malley Borg & Harriet Stranahan, 2002. "The effect of gender and race on student performance in principles of economics: the importance of personality type," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 589-598.
    4. Daniel Caro, 2003. "¿Cómo mejorar el desempeño académico de los estudiantes de secundaria que asisten a escuelas en las zonas pobres del Perú?," Chapters of Books, in: Enrique Vásquez & Diego Winkelried (ed.), Buscando el bienestar de los pobres: ¿cuán lejos estamos?, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, pages 175-208, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico.
    5. Carol A. Lundberg, 2003. "The Influence of Time-Limitations, Faculty, and Peer Relationships on Adult Student Learning: A Causal Model," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(6), pages 665-688, November.
    6. Charles L. Ballard & Marianne F. Johnson, 2004. "Basic Math Skills and Performance in an Introductory Economics Class," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 3-23, January.
    7. Ana María Iregui & Ligia Melo & Jorge Ramos, 2007. "Análisis de eficiencia de la educación en Colombia," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, May.
    8. Attiyeh, Richard & Lumsden, Keith G, 1971. "University Students' Initial Understanding of Economics: The Contribution of the A Level Economics Course and of Other Factors," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 38(149), pages 81-97, February.
    9. Martin P. Shanahan & Jan H. F. Meyer, 2003. "Measuring and Responding to Variation in Aspects of Students' Economic Conceptions and Learning Engagement in Economics," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 1(1), pages 9-35.
    10. Andrea L. Ziegert, 2000. "The Role of Personality Temperament and Student Learning in Principles of Economics: Further Evidence," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 307-322, December.
    11. Luciano Di Gresia & Alberto Porto & Laura Ripani, 2002. "Rendimiento de los Estudiantes de las Universidades Públicas Argentinas," IIE, Working Papers 045, IIE, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    12. Elisa Rose Birch & Paul W. Miller, 2007. "The Influence Of Type Of High School Attended On University Performance," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Randall Krieg & Bulent Uyar, 1997. "Correlates of student performance in Business and Economics Statistics," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 21(3), pages 65-74, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Sabiston & Ambrose Leung & Gianfranco Terrazzano, 2017. "Learning styles and performance in principles of economics: does the gender gap exist?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(4), pages 2935-2944.
    2. Dino Alves & Ana Balcao Reis & Carmo Seabra & Luis Catela-Nunes, 2015. "Determinants of Academic Success in Economics and Management," Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 10, in: Marta Rahona López & Jennifer Graves (ed.), Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 10, edition 1, volume 10, chapter 17, pages 335-356, Asociación de Economía de la Educación.
    3. Zhang, Lemin & Marsh, Dan, 2006. "How Can We Predict Performance in Tertiary Level Economics?," 2006 Conference, August 24-25, 2006, Nelson, New Zealand 31974, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    4. Elchanan Cohn & Sharon Cohn & Donald C. Balch & James Bradley Jr., 2004. "The Relation between Student Attitudes toward Graphs and Performance in Economics," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 48(2), pages 41-52, October.
    5. Ann L. Owen, 2011. "Student Characteristics, Behavior, and Performance in Economics Classes," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 32, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Ivo J. M. Arnold & Wietske Rowaan, 2014. "First-Year Study Success in Economics and Econometrics: The Role of Gender, Motivation, and Math Skills," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 25-35, March.
    7. Stephen Hickson, 2016. "Maybe the Boys Just Like Economics More - The Gender Gap and the Role of Personality Type in Economics Education," Working Papers in Economics 16/07, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    8. Carlos J. Asarta & James R. Schmidt, 2013. "Student Choices of Reduced Seat Time in a Blended Introductory Statistics Course," Working Papers 13-14, University of Delaware, Department of Economics.
    9. Belokrylov, K. & Kivarina, M. & Myasnikov, A. & Ogurtsova, E., 2019. "The Role of Mathematics in Teaching Undergraduate Economics: Students' Opinions and Recommendations," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 43(3), pages 116-150.
    10. Ignacio Lozano & Jorge Ramos & Hernán Rincón, 2007. "Implicaciones Fiscales y Sectoriales de la Reforma a las transferencias Territoriales en Colombia," Borradores de Economia 2816, Banco de la Republica.
    11. Yunhee Chang & Angela Lyons, 2007. "Are Financial Education Programs Meeting the Needs of Financially Disadvantaged Consumers?," NFI Working Papers 2007-WP-02, Indiana State University, Scott College of Business, Networks Financial Institute.
    12. Natalia Kruger & Luis Fernando Gamboa & Fábio Waltenberg, 2014. "Gross Inequality and Inequality of Opportunities in Basic Education: Were they affected by Latin America’s Economic Boom?," Documentos de Trabajo 12322, Universidad del Rosario.
    13. Alejandro Arenas Alzate, 2021. "Mejores colegios en Colombia: efecto de las condiciones socioeconómicas sobre el desempeno escolar," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 19829, Universidad EAFIT.
    14. Mauricio García Villegas & Laura Quiroz López, 2011. "Apartheid educativo. Educación, desigualdad e inmovilidad social en Bogotá," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 13(25), pages 137-162, July-Dece.
    15. Bergtold, Jason S. & Yeager, Elizabeth A. & Griffin, Terry W., 2016. "Academic, Demographic and Spatial Factors in the Classroom Affecting Student Performance in Principles of Agricultural Economics Courses," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235930, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Jeffrey J. Green & Courtenay C. Stone & Abera Zegeye & Thomas A. Charles, 2008. "How Much Math Do Students Need to Succeed in Business and Economics Statistics? An Ordered Probit Analysis," Working Papers 200802, Ball State University, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2008.
    17. David Zetland & Carlo Russo & Navin Yavapolkul, 2010. "Teaching Economic Principles: Algebra, Graph or Both?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 55(1), pages 123-131, May.
    18. Peter Davies & Ross Guest, 2010. "What effect do we really have on students' understanding and attitudes? How do we know?," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 9(1), pages 6-9.
    19. Tasnádi, Attila & Kánnai, Zoltán & Pintér, Miklós, 2010. "Matematikaoktatás a bolognai típusú gazdasági képzésekben [Maths instruction in Bologna-type economics tuition]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 261-277.
    20. Peter Riley Bahr & Claire A. Boeck & Phyllis A. Cummins, 2022. "Is Age Just a Number? A Statewide Investigation of Community College Students’ Age, Classroom Context, and Course Outcomes in College Math and English," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 63(4), pages 631-671, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pai:wpaper:08-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiuppe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.