IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oxf/wpaper/1055.html

The political economy of industrial development organisations: are they run by politicians or bureaucrats?

Author

Listed:
  • Lottie Field

Abstract

This paper produces the first cross-country comparable, scalable method of categorising organisations as political or bureaucratic. I use this method to construct new data on the politicisation of organisations designing industrial policy in 116 countries. Thus, this paper produces the first systematic global analysis of the politicisation of industrial development organisations. I produce the following four stylised facts. First, industrial policymaking is predominantly political. Over 60% of the industrial policy organisations in my data are run by politicians. Second, lower-income countries use a higher proportion of political organisations to do their industrial policy. Third, there is great variation in the proportion of political organisations in each policy area. Politicians run 30% of Export Import and Central banks. Politicians run 60% of organisations focused on primary commodities. Fourth, the proportion of organisations run by bureaucrats is positively and statistically significantly correlated with several measures of bureaucratic quality. This relationship is robust to controlling for the number of industrial policy organisations and GDP per capita.

Suggested Citation

  • Lottie Field, 2024. "The political economy of industrial development organisations: are they run by politicians or bureaucrats?," Economics Series Working Papers 1055, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:1055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:efa51648-2ccb-411e-93f8-e046203a4b1c
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alesina, Alberto & Tabellini, Guido, 2008. "Bureaucrats or politicians? Part II: Multiple policy tasks," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3-4), pages 426-447, April.
    2. Krueger, Anne O, 1990. "Government Failures in Development," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 4(3), pages 9-23, Summer.
    3. Daron Acemoglu & James A. Robinson, 2013. "Economics versus Politics: Pitfalls of Policy Advice," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(2), pages 173-192, Spring.
    4. Réka Juhász & Nathan Lane, 2024. "The Political Economy of Industrial Policy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 38(4), pages 27-54, Fall.
    5. Kaufmann, Daniel & Kraay, Aart & Mastruzzi, Massimo, 2010. "The worldwide governance indicators : methodology and analytical issues," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5430, The World Bank.
    6. Réka Juhász & Nathan Lane & Dani Rodrik, 2024. "The New Economics of Industrial Policy," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 213-242, August.
    7. Lane, Nathaniel, 2016. "Manufacturing Revolutions: Industrial Policy and Industrialization in South Korea," SocArXiv 6tqax, Center for Open Science.
    8. Alberto Alesina & Guido Tabellini, 2005. "Why do Politicians Delegate?," Levine's Bibliography 784828000000000470, UCLA Department of Economics.
    9. Adnan Khan & Guo Xu & Robin Burgess & Timothy Besley, 2022. "Bureaucracy and Development," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 397-424, August.
    10. D. Acemoglu & J. Robinson, 2013. "Economics versus politics: pitfalls of policy advice," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 12.
    11. Kabir, Poorya & Matray, Adrien & Müller, Karsten & Xu, Chenzi, 2024. "EXIM's Exit: The Real Effects of Trade Financing by Export Credit Agencies," CEPR Discussion Papers 18795, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:a4ker_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Field, Lottie, 2024. "The political economy of industrial development organisations: are they run by politicians or bureaucrats?," SocArXiv a4ker, Center for Open Science.
    3. Réka Juhász & Nathan Lane, 2024. "The Political Economy of Industrial Policy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 38(4), pages 27-54, Fall.
    4. repec:osf:osfxxx:y74uh_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Xu, Tao Louie, 2024. "The Road Not Taken? Industrial Policy and Political Settlements in China and Indonesia 1990–2022," MPRA Paper 122669, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Lane, Nathaniel, 2016. "Manufacturing Revolutions: Industrial Policy and Industrialization in South Korea," SocArXiv 6tqax, Center for Open Science.
    7. Hanming Fang & Ming Li & Guangli Lu, 2025. "Decoding China’s Industrial Policies," PIER Working Paper Archive 25-012, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    8. Tang, Lianzhou & Xu, Wenli, 2025. "Patronage and pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    9. Han, Yihan & Pang, Silu & Jiang, Fuxin & Wang, Tao, 2025. "Does “Made in China (2025)” improve innovation quality in robotics? Evidence from PageRank-based patent network," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Calogero Guccio & Domenico Lisi & Ilde Rizzo, 2019. "When the purchasing officer looks the other way: on the waste effects of debauched local environment in public works execution," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 205-236, September.
    11. Matilde Bombardini & Andres Gonzalez-Lira, 2024. "The Increasing Cost of Buying American," CESifo Working Paper Series 11339, CESifo.
    12. Catherine L. Mann, 2024. "Could Domestic Industrial Policies, Even With Global Fragmentation, Revive Productivity?," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 47, pages 3-19, Fall.
    13. Andreas T. Schmidt & Daan Juijn, 2024. "Economic inequality and the long-term future," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 23(1), pages 67-99, February.
    14. Liqiang Dong & Mohamad Helmi Bin Hidthiir & Mustazar Bin Mansur, 2025. "Economic Policy Uncertainty and China’s FDI Inflows: Moderating Effects of Financial Development and Political Stability," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Estrin, Saul & Meyer, Klaus E. & Nielsen, Bo B. & Nielsen, Sabina, 2016. "Home country institutions and the internationalization of state owned enterprises: A cross-country analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 294-307.
    16. Kläffling David & Fricke Thomas, 2025. "Beyond Trade Wars and Economic Nationalism – Towards a Cooperative Global Governance," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 60(5), pages 261-265.
    17. Miravete, Eugenio J. & Moral, María J., 2025. "Shaping preferences through industrial policy: The Canary Islands in autarkic Spain," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    18. Amenu Leta Duguma & Xiuguang Bai & Agerie Nega Wassihun & Bacha Gebissa Negeri, 2025. "On the mediating effect of foreign direct investment in the relationship between governance and economic growth: evidence from selected African countries," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 211-242, June.
    19. Michael Funke & Doudou Zhong, 2024. "The political globalization trilemma revisited: An empirical assessment across countries and over time," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 177-201, March.
    20. Ola Bergström & Alexander Styhre, 2022. "It takes change to remain the same: The transformation of Swedish government policy making in economic crises and the involvement of social partners," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(4), pages 1564-1587, November.
    21. Li, Wen & Peng, Qing, 2023. "Digital courts and corporate investment in sustainability: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    22. Mohammad, Shoeb & Yang, Jie & Butt, Irfan, 2024. "Does corruption have a sanding or greasing impact on innovation? Reconciling the contrasting perspectives through a systematic literature review," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(7).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:1055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anne Pouliquen The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Anne Pouliquen to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfeixuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.