IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v100y2025ics0301420724007979.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Political Economy of local content policy: The Brazilian Oil Industry in the 21st century

Author

Listed:
  • Trojbicz, Beni
  • Françoso, Mariane Santos

Abstract

This study used a Political Economy framework to analyze the political dynamics underlying the design of Local Content Policies (LCPs) and the interaction between technical and political factors in shaping policy guidelines in Brazil from 2003 to 2017. Using a case study, we drew up in-depth interviews, document analysis, and quantitative data to understand the roles of diverse stakeholders in the LCP design process. LCPs are commonly implemented by resource-rich countries to stimulate economic development. The Brazilian oil and gas industry has significantly increased in the early twenty-first century following significant hydrocarbon reserves found in the Continental Shelf. Consequently, LCPs were introduced to maximize the economic benefits of hydrocarbon exploration. However, corruption scandals and corporate bankruptcies negatively affected these policies. Our analysis showed that LCPs faced design failures and inconsistencies over time due to the dominance of vested interests over fundamental technical considerations. Furthermore, ideological shifts within the government intensified policy instability. This study contributes to the discussion on industrial policy design by highlighting the complexities and challenges that undermine the effective implementation of LCP objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Trojbicz, Beni & Françoso, Mariane Santos, 2025. "The Political Economy of local content policy: The Brazilian Oil Industry in the 21st century," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s0301420724007979
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007979
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krueger, Anne O, 1990. "Government Failures in Development," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 4(3), pages 9-23, Summer.
    2. Réka Juhász & Nathan Lane, 2024. "The Political Economy of Industrial Policy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 38(4), pages 27-54, Fall.
    3. Guy Meunier & Jean‐Pierre Ponssard, 2024. "Green industrial policy, information asymmetry, and repayable advance," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 26(1), February.
    4. Alsharif, Nouf & Bhattacharyya, Sambit & Intartaglia, Maurizio, 2017. "Economic diversification in resource rich countries: History, state of knowledge and research agenda," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 154-164.
    5. Rodrik, Dani, 2004. "Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century," CEPR Discussion Papers 4767, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Francis Fukuyama, 2013. "What Is Governance?," Working Papers 314, Center for Global Development.
    7. Nwankwo, Ebuka & Iyeke, Solomon, 2022. "Analysing the impact of oil and gas local content laws on engineering development and the GDP of Nigeria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. Paz, M. José, 2014. "Oil and development in Brazil: Between an extractive and an industrialization strategy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 501-511.
    9. Paulo Gala & Igor Rocha & Guilherme Magacho, 2018. "The structuralist revenge: economic complexity as an important dimension to evaluate growth and development," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 38(2), pages 219-236.
    10. Ngoasong, Michael Zisuh, 2014. "How international oil and gas companies respond to local content policies in petroleum-producing developing countries: A narrative enquiry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 471-479.
    11. Coe, Neil M. & Yeung, Henry Wai-chung, 2015. "Global Production Networks: Theorizing Economic Development in an Interconnected World," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198703914, Decembrie.
    12. Ryggvik, Helge, 2015. "A Short History of the Norwegian Oil Industry: From Protected National Champions to Internationally Competitive Multinationals," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(1), pages 3-41, April.
    13. Shapiro, Helen & Taylor, Lance, 1990. "The state and industrial strategy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 861-878, June.
    14. Prebisch, Raúl, 1949. "O Desenvolvimento Econômico da América Latina e seus Principais Problemas," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 3(3), July.
    15. Trojbicz, Beni & Loureiro, Maria Rita, 2018. "Brazilian oil sector reforms: The role of technical know-how and corporate ethos in Petrobras's dominance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 588-595.
    16. Bloch, Robin & Owusu, George, 2012. "Linkages in Ghana's gold mining industry: Challenging the enclave thesis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 434-442.
    17. repec:osf:osfxxx:y74uh_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Andreoni, Antonio & Chang, Ha-Joon, 2019. "The political economy of industrial policy: Structural interdependencies, policy alignment and conflict management," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 136-150.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank Yao Gbadago, 2025. "Analyzing local content and in-country spending requirements to advance technology transfers and support entrepreneurial development in Ghana’s upstream petroleum sector," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Anders Gustafsson & Andreas Stephan & Alice Hallman & Nils Karlsson, 2016. "The “sugar rush” from innovation subsidies: a robust political economy perspective," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 43(4), pages 729-756, November.
    3. Sergio G. Lazzarini, 2015. "Strategizing by the government: Can industrial policy create firm-level competitive advantage?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 97-112, January.
    4. Réka Juhász & Nathan Lane, 2024. "The Political Economy of Industrial Policy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 38(4), pages 27-54, Fall.
    5. Mariana Mazzucato & Caetano C.R. Penna, 2016. "Beyond market failures: the market creating and shaping roles of state investment banks," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 305-326, October.
    6. Marco R. Di Tommaso & Stuart O. Schweitzer, 2013. "Industrial Policy in America," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13749, March.
    7. Issabayev, Murat & Rizvanoghlu, Islam, 2019. "Optimal choice between local content requirement and fiscal policy in extractive industries: A theoretical analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1-8.
    8. Joseph T. Mahoney & Anita M. McGahan & Christos N. Pitelis, 2009. "Perspective ---The Interdependence of Private and Public Interests," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(6), pages 1034-1052, December.
    9. Uyarra, Elvira & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel & Flanagan, Kieron & Magro, Edurne, 2020. "Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    10. Lazzarini, Sérgio G., 2012. "Strategizing by the Government: Industrial Policy and Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Insper Working Papers wpe_289, Insper Working Paper, Insper Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa.
    11. Hodler, Roland, 2009. "Industrial policy in an imperfect world," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 85-93, September.
    12. Klein, Peter G. & Mahoney, Joseph T. & McGahan, Anita M. & Pitelis, Christos N., 2009. "Toward a Theory of Public Entrepreneurship," Working Papers 09-0106, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    13. Raphael Kaplinsky & Mike Morris, 2016. "Thinning and Thickening: Productive Sector Policies in The Era of Global Value Chains," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(4), pages 625-645, September.
    14. Slavo Radosevic, 2009. "Policies for Promoting Technological Catch Up: Towards a Post-Washington Approach," Institutions and Economies (formerly known as International Journal of Institutions and Economies), Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, vol. 1(1), pages 23-52, June.
    15. Lazzarini, Sergio G. & Musacchio, Aldo & Bandeira-de-Mello, Rodrigo & Marcon, Rosilene, 2015. "What Do State-Owned Development Banks Do? Evidence from BNDES, 2002–09," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 237-253.
    16. repec:osf:socarx:a4ker_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Sevde Arpaci‐Ayhan, 2023. "Foreign aid as a catalyst for improving productive capabilities in recipients," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(5), pages 738-760, July.
    18. Markus M Bugge & Lars Coenen & Are Branstad, 2018. "Governing socio-technical change: Orchestrating demand for assisted living in ageing societies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 468-479.
    19. Trojbicz, Beni & Loureiro, Maria Rita, 2018. "Brazilian oil sector reforms: The role of technical know-how and corporate ethos in Petrobras's dominance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 588-595.
    20. Helen Shapiro, 2007. "Industrial Policy and Growth," Working Papers 53, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    21. Hanming Fang & Ming Li & Guangli Lu, 2025. "Decoding China’s Industrial Policies," PIER Working Paper Archive 25-012, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s0301420724007979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.