IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/ugqnx_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Liberalization

Author

Listed:
  • Betz, Timm

    (Washington University in St. Louis)

  • Pond, Amy

Abstract

Liberalization is the removal of barriers to the cross-border movement of capital, goods, and people. Understanding liberalization is central to understanding how governments respond to and shape their role in the global economy. This chapter explores the literature on liberalization from a public-goods perspective, where liberalization is seen as benefiting the population as a whole, and from a private-goods perspective, where liberalization benefits a select few. These perspectives are united by questions over who supports liberalization, when liberalization occurs, and how governments liberalize markets. The chapter further explores the methods and approaches used by American IPE, represented by articles published in International Organization, and British IPE, represented by articles published in the Review of International Political Economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Betz, Timm & Pond, Amy, 2025. "Liberalization," SocArXiv ugqnx_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:ugqnx_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ugqnx_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6864dbbe06e718bb247ea857/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/ugqnx_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Baldwin & Frédéric Robert-Nicoud, 2015. "A simple model of the juggernaut effect of trade liberalisation," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 143, pages 70-79.
    2. Edward D. Mansfield & Helen V. Milner & B. Peter Rosendorff, 2015. "Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Edward D Mansfield (ed.), THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE, chapter 7, pages 127-143, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Eric Helleiner, 2019. "The life and times of embedded liberalism: legacies and innovations since Bretton Woods," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 1112-1135, November.
    4. Benjamin J. Cohen, 2008. "Introduction to International Political Economy: An Intellectual History," Introductory Chapters, in: International Political Economy: An Intellectual History, Princeton University Press.
    5. Gawande, Kishore & Krishna, Pravin & Olarreaga, Marcelo, 2009. "What Governments Maximize and Why: The View from Trade," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(3), pages 491-532, July.
    6. Orfeo Fioretos & Eugénia C. Heldt, 2019. "Legacies and innovations in global economic governance since Bretton Woods," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 1089-1111, November.
    7. Mary Anne Madeira, 2016. "New trade, new politics: intra-industry trade and domestic political coalitions," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 677-711, July.
    8. Matias E. Margulis, 2018. "Negotiating from the margins: how the UN shapes the rules of the WTO," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 364-391, May.
    9. Ida Bastiaens & Nita Rudra, 2016. "Trade liberalization and the challenges of revenue mobilization: can international financial institutions make a difference?," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 261-289, April.
    10. Milner, Helen V. & Yoffie, David B., 1989. "Between free trade and protectionism: strategic trade policy and a theory of corporate trade demands," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 239-272, April.
    11. Thomas Richter, 2013. "When do autocracies start to liberalize foreign trade? Evidence from four cases in the Middle East and North Africa," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 760-787, August.
    12. Henry Farrell & Abraham Newman, 2016. "The new interdependence approach: theoretical development and empirical demonstration," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 713-736, September.
    13. Chase, Kerry A., 2008. "Moving Hollywood Abroad: Divided Labor Markets and the New Politics of Trade in Services," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(4), pages 653-687, October.
    14. Hays, Jude, 2009. "Globalization and the New Politics of Embedded Liberalism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195369328, Decembrie.
    15. Poast, Paul, 2012. "Does Issue Linkage Work? Evidence from European Alliance Negotiations, 1860 to 1945," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 66(2), pages 277-310, April.
    16. repec:now:journl:100.00014065 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Queralt, Didac, 2015. "From Mercantilism to Free Trade: A History of Fiscal Capacity Building," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 10(2), pages 221-273, June.
    18. David H. Autor & David Dorn & Gordon H. Hanson, 2013. "The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(6), pages 2121-2168, October.
    19. Ahlquist, John S. & Clayton, Amanda B. & Levi, Margaret, 2014. "Provoking Preferences: Unionization, Trade Policy, and the ILWU Puzzle," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(1), pages 33-75, January.
    20. Lohmann, Susanne & O'Halloran, Sharyn, 1994. "Divided government and U.S. trade policy: theory and evidence," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(4), pages 595-632, October.
    21. Jensen, J. Bradford & Quinn, Dennis P. & Weymouth, Stephen, 2015. "The Influence of Firm Global Supply Chains and Foreign Currency Undervaluations on US Trade Disputes," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 69(4), pages 913-947, October.
    22. Cecile Gaubert & Oleg Itskhoki, 2021. "Granular Comparative Advantage," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(3), pages 871-939.
    23. Scheve, Kenneth F. & Slaughter, Matthew J., 2001. "What determines individual trade-policy preferences?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 267-292, August.
    24. Ladewig, Jeffrey W., 2006. "Domestic Influences on International Trade Policy: Factor Mobility in the United States, 1963 to 1992," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(1), pages 69-103, January.
    25. Kucik, Jeffrey & Pelc, Krzysztof J., 2016. "Measuring the Cost of Privacy: A Look at the Distributional Effects of Private Bargaining," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(4), pages 861-889, October.
    26. Amy Pond, 2018. "Protecting Property: The Politics of Redistribution, Expropriation, and Market Openness," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 181-210, July.
    27. Ayse Kaya & Mike Reay, 2019. "How did the Washington consensus move within the IMF? Fragmented change from the 1980s to the aftermath of the 2008 crisis," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 384-409, May.
    28. Amy Skonieczny, 2018. "Trading with the enemy: narrative, identity and US trade politics," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 441-462, July.
    29. Moran, Theodore H., 1978. "Multinational corporations and dependency: a dialogue for dependentistas and non-dependentistas," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 79-100, January.
    30. Mutz, Diana C. & Kim, Eunji, 2017. "The Impact of In-group Favoritism on Trade Preferences," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(4), pages 827-850, October.
    31. Plouffe, Michael, 2017. "Firm Heterogeneity and Trade-Policy Stances Evidence from a Survey of Japanese Producers †," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 1-40, March.
    32. Manger, Mark S., 2005. "Competition and bilateralism in trade policy: the case of Japan's free trade agreements," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 25292, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    33. Dennis P. Quinn & A. Maria Toyoda, 2007. "Ideology and Voter Preferences as Determinants of Financial Globalization," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(2), pages 344-363, April.
    34. Kim, In Song, 2017. "Political Cleavages within Industry: Firm-level Lobbying for Trade Liberalization," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 111(1), pages 1-20, February.
    35. Alasdair R. Young, 2016. "Not your parents' trade politics: the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership negotiations," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 345-378, May.
    36. Goldstein, Judith, 1986. "The Political Economy of Trade: Institutions of Protection," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 80(1), pages 161-184, March.
    37. Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey, 2006. "From the Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas, and Institutions in Historical Perspective," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262195437, December.
    38. Nuno Limão, 2018. "Preferential Trade Agreements as Stumbling Blocks for Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Evidence for the United States," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Policy Externalities and International Trade Agreements, chapter 13, pages 353-371, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    39. Lisa Lechner, 2016. "The domestic battle over the design of non-trade issues in preferential trade agreements," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 840-871, September.
    40. Orfeo Fioretos, 2019. "Minilateralism and informality in international monetary cooperation," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 1136-1159, November.
    41. Morrow, James D. & Siverson, Randolph M. & Tabares, Tressa E., 1998. "The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 92(3), pages 649-661, September.
    42. Hainmueller, Jens & Hiscox, Michael J. & Margalit, Yotam, 2015. "Do concerns about labor market competition shape attitudes toward immigration? New evidence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 193-207.
    43. Peter Rutland, 2013. "Neoliberalism and the Russian transition," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 332-362, April.
    44. Davis, Christina L., 2004. "International Institutions and Issue Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade Liberalization," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(1), pages 153-169, February.
    45. Chaudoin, Stephen, 2014. "Audience Features and the Strategic Timing of Trade Disputes," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(4), pages 877-911, October.
    46. Busch, Marc L. & Reinhardt, Eric, 2005. "Industrial Location and Voter Participation in Europe," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(4), pages 713-730, October.
    47. Mansfield, Edward D. & Milner, Helen V. & Pevehouse, Jon C., 2007. "Vetoing Co-operation: The Impact of Veto Players on Preferential Trading Arrangements," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(3), pages 403-432, July.
    48. Thomas B. Pepinsky, 2013. "The domestic politics of financial internationalization in the developing world," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 848-880, August.
    49. Kono, Daniel Y., 2006. "Optimal Obfuscation: Democracy and Trade Policy Transparency," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 100(3), pages 369-384, August.
    50. Frieden, Jeffry A., 1991. "Invested interests: the politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 425-451, October.
    51. Mark Blyth & Matthias Matthijs, 2017. "Black Swans, Lame Ducks, and the mystery of IPE's missing macroeconomy," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 203-231, March.
    52. Tim Büthe & Walter Mattli, 2011. "The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9470.
    53. Guisinger, Alexandra, 2009. "Determining Trade Policy: Do Voters Hold Politicians Accountable?," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(3), pages 533-557, July.
    54. Hathaway, Oona A., 1998. "Positive Feedback: The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Industry Demands for Protection," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 575-612, July.
    55. Chase, Kerry A., 2008. "Protecting Free Trade: The Political Economy of Rules of Origin," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(3), pages 507-530, July.
    56. Iain Osgood, 2016. "Differentiated Products, Divided Industries: Firm Preferences over Trade Liberalization," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 161-180, July.
    57. Rajan, Raghuram G. & Zingales, Luigi, 2003. "The great reversals: the politics of financial development in the twentieth century," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 5-50, July.
    58. Bearce, David H. & Hart, Andrew F., 2017. "International Labor Mobility and the Variety of Democratic Political Institutions," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(1), pages 65-95, January.
    59. Rogowski, Ronald, 1987. "Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 81(4), pages 1121-1137, December.
    60. Margalit, Yotam, 2011. "Costly Jobs: Trade-related Layoffs, Government Compensation, and Voting in U.S. Elections," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 105(1), pages 166-188, February.
    61. Ardanaz, Martin & Murillo, M. Victoria & Pinto, Pablo M., 2013. "Sensitivity to Issue Framing on Trade Policy Preferences: Evidence from a Survey Experiment," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 67(2), pages 411-437, April.
    62. Andy Baker, 2005. "Who Wants to Globalize? Consumer Tastes and Labor Markets in a Theory of Trade Policy Beliefs," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(4), pages 924-938, October.
    63. Cornel Ban & Mark Blyth, 2013. "The BRICs and the Washington Consensus: An introduction," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 241-255, April.
    64. Michael Bechtel & Thomas Bernauer & Reto Meyer, 2012. "The green side of protectionism: Environmental concerns and three facets of trade policy preferences," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 837-866.
    65. Rickard, Stephanie J., 2012. "Electoral Systems, Voters’ Interests and Geographic Dispersion," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(4), pages 855-877, October.
    66. Amy Pond, 2018. "Worker Influence on Capital Account Policy: Inflow Liberalization and Outflow Restrictions," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 244-267, March.
    67. Pahre,Robert, 2008. "Politics and Trade Cooperation in the Nineteenth Century," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521872744, September.
    68. Mansfield, Edward D. & Busch, Marc L., 1995. "The political economy of nontariff barriers: a cross-national analysis," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 723-749, October.
    69. Chwieroth, Jeffrey, 2007. "Neoliberal Economists and Capital Account Liberalization in Emerging Markets," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 61(2), pages 443-463, April.
    70. Mark P. Dallas, 2015. "'Governed' trade: global value chains, firms, and the heterogeneity of trade in an era of fragmented production," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 875-909, October.
    71. Goldstein, Judith & Gulotty, Robert, 2014. "America and Trade Liberalization: The Limits of Institutional Reform," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 263-295, April.
    72. Jagdish N. Bhagwati, 2004. "In Defense of Globalization: It Has a Human Face," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 94(6), pages 9-20, November-.
    73. Owen, Erica & Johnston, Noel P., 2017. "Occupation and the Political Economy of Trade: Job Routineness, Offshorability, and Protectionist Sentiment," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(4), pages 665-699, October.
    74. Milner, Helen V. & Kubota, Keiko, 2005. "Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(1), pages 107-143, January.
    75. Clark, William Roberts & Golder, Matt & Golder, Sona N., 2017. "The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay: An Exit, Voice and Loyalty Model of Politics," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(4), pages 719-748, October.
    76. Mansfield, Edward D. & Milner, Helen V., 2018. "The Domestic Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements in Hard Times," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 371-403, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jieun Lee & Iain Osgood, 2018. "Exports, Jobs, Growth! Congressional Hearings on US Trade Agreements," Working Papers 667, Research Seminar in International Economics, University of Michigan.
    2. Leonardo Baccini & Iain Osgood & Stephen Weymouth, 2019. "The service economy: U.S. trade coalitions in an era of deindustrialization," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 261-296, June.
    3. Jieun Lee & Iain Osgood, 2019. "Exports, jobs, growth! Congressional hearings on US trade agreements," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Timm Betz & Amy Pond & Weiwen Yin, 2021. "Investment agreements and the fragmentation of firms across countries," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 755-791, October.
    5. Thiemo Fetzer & Carlo Schwarz, 2021. "Tariffs and Politics: Evidence from Trump’s Trade Wars," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(636), pages 1717-1741.
    6. Pierre-Olivier Peytral, 2004. "Economie politique de la politique d'ouverture commerciale mixte : interactions entre les groupes sociaux et l'Etat," Post-Print halshs-00104875, HAL.
    7. Michael‐David Mangini, 2023. "Escape from tariffs: The political economies of protection and classification," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 773-805, November.
    8. Erin Lockwood, 2021. "The international political economy of global inequality," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 421-445, March.
    9. Chun-Fang Chiang & Jason M. Kuo & Megumi Naoi & Jin-Tan Liu, 2020. "What Do Voters Learn from Foreign News? Emulation, Backlash, and Public Support for Trade Agreements," NBER Working Papers 27497, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Jeheung Ryu & Randall W. Stone, 2018. "Plaintiffs by proxy: A firm-level approach to WTO dispute resolution," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 273-308, June.
    11. Cevat G. Aksoy & Sergei Guriev & Daniel S. Treisman, 2018. "Globalization, Government Popularity, and the Great Skill Divide," NBER Working Papers 25062, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Christopher Balding, 2011. "A Re-examination of the Relation between Democracy and International Trade: The Case of Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2011-059, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Amy Pond, 2018. "Protecting Property: The Politics of Redistribution, Expropriation, and Market Openness," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 181-210, July.
    14. Philipp Harms & Nils D. Steiner, 2023. "Attitudes towards Globalization: A Survey," Working Papers 2305, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    15. Timm Betz & Amy Pond, 2025. "Governments as borrowers and regulators," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 189-218, March.
    16. Alexander Kentikelenis & Erik Voeten, 2021. "Legitimacy challenges to the liberal world order: Evidence from United Nations speeches, 1970–2018," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 721-754, October.
    17. Federico Maria Ferrara & Jörg S Haas & Andrew Peterson & Thomas Sattler, 2022. "Exports vs. Investment: How Public Discourse Shapes Support for External Imbalances," Post-Print hal-02569351, HAL.
    18. Ilan Vertinsky & Yingqiu Kuang & Dongsheng Zhou & Victor Cui, 2023. "The political economy and dynamics of bifurcated world governance and the decoupling of value chains: An alternative perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(7), pages 1351-1377, September.
    19. Gawande, Kishore & Krishna, Pravin & Olarreaga, Marcelo, 2009. "What Governments Maximize and Why: The View from Trade," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(3), pages 491-532, July.
    20. Betz, Timm & Pond, Amy, 2025. "Governments as Borrowers and Regulators," SocArXiv gr37y_v1, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:ugqnx_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.