The political economy and dynamics of bifurcated world governance and the decoupling of value chains: An alternative perspective
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1057/s41267-023-00597-z
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Marc J. Melitz, 2003.
"The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(6), pages 1695-1725, November.
- Mark J. Melitz, 2002. "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity," NBER Working Papers 8881, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Melitz, Marc J, 2002. "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity," CEPR Discussion Papers 3381, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Olga Petricevic & David J Teece, 2019. "The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1487-1512, December.
- Scheve, Kenneth F. & Slaughter, Matthew J., 2001. "What determines individual trade-policy preferences?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 267-292, August.
- Edward D. Mansfield & Helen V. Milner & B. Peter Rosendorff, 2015.
"Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade,"
World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Edward D Mansfield (ed.), THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE, chapter 7, pages 127-143,
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
- Mansfield, Edward D. & Milner, Helen V. & Rosendorff, B. Peter, 2000. "Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 94(2), pages 305-321, June.
- Christopher A. McNally, 2020. "Chaotic mélange: neo-liberalism and neo-statism in the age of Sino-capitalism," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 281-301, March.
- Mayda, Anna Maria & Rodrik, Dani, 2005.
"Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 1393-1430, August.
- Anna Maria Mayda & Dani Rodrik, 2001. "Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others?," NBER Working Papers 8461, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Anna Maria Mayda (Georgetown University) and Dani Rodrik (Harvard University), 2005. "Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?," Working Papers gueconwpa~05-05-11, Georgetown University, Department of Economics.
- Rodrik, Dani & Mayda, Anna Maria, 2001. "Why are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others?," CEPR Discussion Papers 2960, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- David Lake, 2009. "Open economy politics: A critical review," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 219-244, September.
- Arie Y. Lewin & Michael A. Witt, 2022. "China’s Belt and Road Initiative and international business: The overlooked centrality of politics," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(2), pages 266-275, June.
- Rogowski, Ronald, 1987. "Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 81(4), pages 1121-1137, December.
- Davis, Christina L., 2004. "International Institutions and Issue Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade Liberalization," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(1), pages 153-169, February.
- Teece, David J., 2020. "Fundamental Issues in Strategy: Time to Reassess?," Strategic Management Review, now publishers, vol. 1(1), pages 103-144, March.
- James A Brander & Victor Cui & Ilan Vertinsky, 2017. "China and intellectual property rights: A challenge to the rule of law," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(7), pages 908-921, September.
- David J Teece, 2014. "A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 45(1), pages 8-37, January.
- Kevin Shear McCann, 2000. "The diversity–stability debate," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6783), pages 228-233, May.
- Hiscox, Michael J., 2002. "Commerce, Coalitions, and Factor Mobility: Evidence from Congressional Votes on Trade Legislation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 96(3), pages 593-608, September.
- Victor Cui & Haibin Yang & Ilan Vertinsky, 2018. "Attacking your partners: Strategic alliances and competition between partners in product markets," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(12), pages 3116-3139, December.
- Xielin Liu & Sylvia Schwaag Serger & Ulrike Tagscherer & Amber Y. Chang, 2017. "Beyond catch-up—can a new innovation policy help China overcome the middle income trap?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(5), pages 656-669.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Sorin M. S. Krammer & Ari Assche, 2024. "Chip war: the fight for the world’s most critical technology," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(7), pages 945-947, September.
- Nigel Driffield & Irina Surdu & Xiaocan Yuan, 2024. "Country-level dynamic capabilities and inward FDI: a framework on future policy adaptations applied to post-Brexit UK," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(3), pages 276-294, September.
- Kazuhiro Asakawa & Jeremy Clegg, 2024. "The changing faces of global cities and firms: a new perspective on firms’ location strategy," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(1), pages 37-49, February.
- Victor Cui & Ilan Vertinsky & Yonggui Wang & Dongsheng Zhou, 2023. "Decoupling in international business: The ‘new’ vulnerability of globalization and MNEs’ response strategies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(8), pages 1562-1576, October.
- Yujia, Li & Zixiang, Zhu & Ming, Che, 2024. "Exploring the relationship between China's economic policy uncertainty and business cycles: Exogenous impulse or endogenous responses?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
- Simon J. Evenett & Niccolò Pisani, 2023. "Geopolitics, conflict, and decoupling: evidence of Western divestment from Russia during 2022," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(4), pages 511-540, December.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Rodríguez Chatruc, Marisol & Stein, Ernesto H. & Vlaicu, Razvan, 2019. "Trade Attitudes in Latin America: Evidence from a Multi-Country Survey Experiment," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 9603, Inter-American Development Bank.
- Christian Dippel & Robert Gold & Stephan Heblich & Rodrigo Pinto, 2017.
"Instrumental Variables and Causal Mechanisms: Unpacking the Effect of Trade on Workers and Voters,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
6816, CESifo.
- Christian Dippel & Robert Gold & Stephan Heblich & Rodrigo Pinto, 2017. "Instrumental Variables and Causal Mechanisms: Unpacking The Effect of Trade on Workers and Voters," NBER Working Papers 23209, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Gold, Robert & Dippel, Christian & Heblich, Stephan & Pinto, Rodrigo, 2017. "Instrumental Variables and Causal Mechanisms: Unpacking the Effect of Trade on Workers and Voters," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168152, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
- Gabriel Felbermayr & Toshihiro Okubo, 2022.
"Individual preferences on trade liberalization: evidence from a Japanese household survey,"
Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(1), pages 305-330, February.
- Gabriel Felbermayr & Toshihiro Okubo, 2020. "Individual Preferences on Trade Liberalization: Evidence from a Japanese Household Survey," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2020-010, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
- Eiichi Tomiura & Banri Ito & Hiroshi Mukunoki & Ryuhei Wakasugi, 2016. "Individual Characteristics, Behavioral Biases, and Trade Policy Preferences: Evidence from a Survey in Japan," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 1081-1095, November.
- Wolfgang Lechthaler & Mariya Mileva, 2021.
"The Dynamic And Distributional Aspects Of Import Tariffs,"
International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 62(1), pages 199-241, February.
- Lechthaler, Wolfgang & Mileva, Mariya, 2017. "The dynamic and distributional aspects of import tariffs," Kiel Working Papers 2082, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
- Lechthaler, Wolfgang & Mileva, Mariya, 2020. "The Dynamic And Distributional Aspects Of Import Tariffs," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 233708, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
- Lechthaler, Wolfgang & Mileva, Mariya, 2021. "The Dynamic and Distributional Aspects of Import Tariffs," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 230938, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
- Cevat G. Aksoy & Sergei Guriev & Daniel S. Treisman, 2018.
"Globalization, Government Popularity, and the Great Skill Divide,"
NBER Working Papers
25062, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Aksoy, Cevat Giray & Guriev, Sergei & Treisman, Daniel, 2022. "Globalization, Government Popularity, and the Great Skill Divide," SocArXiv 256eh, Center for Open Science.
- Cevat G Aksoy & Sergei Guriev & Daniel Treisman, 2022. "Globalization, Government Popularity, and the Great Skill Divide," Working Papers hal-03878678, HAL.
- Cevat G Aksoy & Sergei Guriev & Daniel Treisman, 2022. "Globalization, Government Popularity, and the Great Skill Divide," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03878678, HAL.
- Aksoy, Cevat Giray & Guriev, Sergei & Treisman, Daniel, 2020. "Globalization, Government Popularity, and the Great Skill Divide," IZA Discussion Papers 13026, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Guriev, Sergei & Treisman, Daniel & Aksoy, Cevat Giray, 2022. "Globalization, Government Popularity, and the Great Skill Divide," CEPR Discussion Papers 12897, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Murard, Elie, 2017. "Less Welfare or Fewer Foreigners? Immigrant Inflows and Public Opinion towards Redistribution and Migration Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 10805, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Behrens, Kristian & Murata, Yasusada, 2012.
"Globalization and individual gains from trade,"
Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(8), pages 703-720.
- Murata, Yasusada & Behrens, Kristian, 2009. "Globalization and Individual Gains from Trade," CEPR Discussion Papers 7448, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Kristian Behrens & Yasusada Murata, 2009. "Globalization and Individual Gains from Trade," Cahiers de recherche 0928, CIRPEE.
- Ito, Banri & Mukunoki, Hiroshi & Tomiura, Eiichi & Wakasugi, Ryuhei, 2019.
"Trade policy preferences and cross-regional differences: Evidence from individual-level data of Japan,"
Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 99-109.
- ITO Banri & MUKUNOKI Hiroshi & TOMIURA Eiichi & WAKASUGI Ryuhei, 2015. "Trade Policy Preferences and Cross-Regional Differences: Evidence from individual-level data of Japan," Discussion papers 15003, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
- Jiatao Li & Ari Van Assche & Xiaolan Fu & Lee Li & Gongming Qian, 2022. "The Belt and Road Initiative and international business policy: A kaleidoscopic perspective," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(2), pages 135-151, June.
- Rodríguez Chatruc, Marisol & Stein, Ernesto & Vlaicu, Razvan, 2021. "How issue framing shapes trade attitudes: Evidence from a multi-country survey experiment," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
- Ida Bastiaens & Evgeny Postnikov, 2020. "Social standards in trade agreements and free trade preferences: An empirical investigation," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 793-816, October.
- Rommel, Tobias & Walter, Stefanie, 2016. "The Electoral Consequences of Offshoring," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 286, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
- Philipp Harms & Nils D. Steiner, 2023. "Attitudes towards Globalization: A Survey," Working Papers 2305, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
- Christian Dippel & Robert Gold & Stephan Heblich, 2015. "Globalization and Its (Dis-)Content: Trade Shocks and Voting Behavior," NBER Working Papers 21812, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Nils D Steiner, 2018. "Attitudes towards the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership in the European Union: The treaty partner heuristic and issue attention," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(2), pages 255-277, June.
- Aurora Liu Genin & Justin Tan & Juan Song, 2022. "Relational assets or liabilities? Competition, collaboration, and firm intellectual property breakthrough in the Chinese high-speed train sector," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(9), pages 1895-1923, December.
- Kristian Behrens & Yasusada Murata, 2012. "Globalization and Individual Gains from Trade (revised version)," Cahiers de recherche 1218, CIRPEE.
- Nathaniel P.S. Cook & Robert L. Underwood, 2012.
"Attitudes Toward Economic Globalization: Does Knowledge Matter?,"
Global Economy Journal (GEJ), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, November.
- Cook Nathaniel P.S. & Underwood Robert L., 2012. "Attitudes Toward Economic Globalization: Does Knowledge Matter?," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, December.
- Paola Conconi & Giovanni Facchini & Max F. Steinhardt & Maurizio Zanardi, 2020.
"The political economy of trade and migration: Evidence from the U.S. Congress,"
Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 250-278, July.
- Zanardi, Maurizio & Facchini, Giovanni & Conconi, Paola & Steinhardt, Max, 2012. "The political economy of trade and migration: Evidence from the U.S. Congress," CEPR Discussion Papers 9270, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Steinhardt, Max & Conconi, Paola & Facchini, Giovanni & Zanardi, Maurizio, 2013. "The political economy of trade and migration:Evidence from the U.S. Congress," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79961, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
- Paola Conconi & Giovanni Facchini & Maurizio Zanardi, 2020. "The Political Economy of Trade and Migration: Evidence from the U.S. Congress," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/318670, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Conconi, Paola & Facchini, Giovanni & Steinhardt, Max F. & Zanardi, Maurizio, 2018. "The political economy of trade and migration: evidence from the U.S. Congress," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91685, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Paola Conconi & Giovanni Facchini & Max F. Steinhardt & Maurizio Zanardi, 2018. "The political economy of trade and migration: evidence from the US Congress," CEP Discussion Papers dp1564, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Paola Conconi & Giovanni Facchini & Max F. Steinhardt & Maurizio Zanardi, 2012. "The political economy of trade and migration: Evidence from the U.S. Congress," Norface Discussion Paper Series 2012031, Norface Research Programme on Migration, Department of Economics, University College London.
- Paola Conconi & Giovanni Facchini & Max F. Steinhardt & Maurizio Zanardi, 2012. "The Political Economy of Trade and Migration: Evidence from the U.S. Congress," Development Working Papers 346, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano, revised 13 Nov 2012.
- Conconi, Paola & Facchini, Giovanni & Steinhardt, Max Friedrich & Zanardi, Maurizio, 2012. "The political economy of trade and migration: Evidence from the US Congress," HWWI Research Papers 136, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
More about this item
Keywords
bifurcation; supply-chain decoupling; China; United States; innovation networks; political economy;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:54:y:2023:i:7:d:10.1057_s41267-023-00597-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.