IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/29789.html

Where Do My Tax Dollars Go? Tax Morale Effects of Perceived Government Spending

Author

Listed:
  • Matias Giaccobasso
  • Brad C. Nathan
  • Ricardo Perez-Truglia
  • Alejandro Zentner

Abstract

Do perceptions about government spending affect willingness to pay taxes? We test this hypothesis with a natural field experiment that focuses on the allocation of property taxes to public schools. Our results show that taxpayers often misperceive the destination of their tax dollars. By introducing shocks to households’ perceptions via an information-provision experiment, we find that perceptions of how tax dollars are used significantly affect the probability of filing a tax appeal. Moreover, the effects are consistent with reciprocal motivations: individuals are more willing to pay taxes if they believe that the government services funded by those taxes will provide greater personal benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Matias Giaccobasso & Brad C. Nathan & Ricardo Perez-Truglia & Alejandro Zentner, 2022. "Where Do My Tax Dollars Go? Tax Morale Effects of Perceived Government Spending," NBER Working Papers 29789, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29789
    Note: ED LE PE POL
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w29789.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wayne Aaron Sandholtz & Pedro C. Vicente, 2024. "Tax morale, public goods, and politics: Experimental evidence from Mozambique," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp671, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    2. Sebastian Blesse & Philipp Lergetporer & Justus Nover & Katharina Werner, 2023. "Transparency and Policy Competition: Experimental Evidence from German Citizens and Politicians," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 387, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    3. Bartak, Jakub & Jabłoński, Łukasz & Obłąkowska, Katarzyna, 2025. "Fiscal policy preferences: Evidence from conjoint experiments in Poland," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Hoy, Christopher, 2025. "How does progressivity impact tax morale? Experimental evidence across developing countries," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    5. Fernandez Sierra, Manuel & Gonzalez-Navarro, Marco & Quintana-Domeque, Climent, 2025. "Local Public Goods and Property Tax Compliance: Experimental Evidence from Street Pavement," IZA Discussion Papers 18082, IZA Network @ LISER.
    6. Zakharov, Alexei, 2024. "Overestimation of social security payments reduces preferences for spending on social policy," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Zentner, Alejandro & Holz, Justin, 2025. "Frictions in recovering unclaimed property: Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    8. McNamara, Trent & Mosquera, Roberto, 2025. "Government transparency and tax compliance: Evidence from an artefactual experiment supplemented with administrative data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    9. Hoy,Christopher Alexander, 2022. "How Does the Progressivity of Taxes and Government Transfers Impact People’s Willingnessto Pay Tax ? Experimental Evidence across Developing Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10167, The World Bank.
    10. Brockmeyer, Anne & Garfias, Francisco & Suárez Serrato, Juan Carlos, 2024. "The Fiscal Contract up Close: Experimental Evidence from Mexico City," CEPR Discussion Papers 19354, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Wayne Aaron Sandholtz & Pedro C. Vicente, 2024. "Tax morale, public goods, and politics: Experimental evidence from Mozambique," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp2404, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    12. Patricia Gil & Justin E. Holz & John A. List & Andrew Simon & Alejandro Zentner, 2023. "Toward an Understanding of Tax Amnesties: Theory and Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 31210, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Bouke Klein Teeselink & Georgios Melios, 2025. "Partisanship, political alignment, and charitable donations," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 203(3), pages 523-538, June.
    14. Gordon Burtch & Alejandro Zentner, 2024. "Gender Bias and Property Taxes," Papers 2412.12610, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    15. Kishishita, Daiki & Matsumoto, Tomoko, 2024. "Self-benefits, fiscal risk, and political support for the public healthcare system," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • I22 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Educational Finance; Financial Aid
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.