IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05345071.html

Safeguarding worker psychosocial well-being in the age of AI: The critical role of decision control

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Passalacqua

    (UQAM - Université du Québec à Montréal = University of Québec in Montréal)

  • Robert Pellerin

    (MAGI - Département de Mathématiques et de Génie Industriel - EPM - École Polytechnique de Montréal)

  • Florian Magnani

    (MAGELLAN - Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)

  • Laurent Joblot

    (LISPEN - Laboratoire d’Ingénierie des Systèmes Physiques et Numériques - Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies)

  • Frédéric Rosin

    (LISPEN - Laboratoire d’Ingénierie des Systèmes Physiques et Numériques - Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies)

  • Esma Yahia

    (LISPEN - Laboratoire d’Ingénierie des Systèmes Physiques et Numériques - Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies)

  • Pierre-Majorique Léger

    (HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal)

Abstract

Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have ushered in the era of the fourth industrial revolution, transforming workplace dynamics with AI's enhanced decision-making capabilities. While AI has been shown to reduce worker mental workload, improve performance, and enhance physical safety, it also has the potential to negatively impact psychosocial factors, such as work meaningfulness, worker autonomy, and motivation, among others. These factors are crucial as they impact employee retention, well-being, and organizational performance. Yet, the impact of automating decision-making aspects of work on the psychosocial dimension of human-AI interaction remains largely unknown due to the lack of empirical evidence. To address this gap, our study conducted an experiment with 102 participants in a laboratory designed to replicate a manufacturing line. We manipulated the level of AI decision support-characterized by the AI's decision-making control-to observe its effects on worker psychosocial factors through a blend of perceptual, physiological, and observational measures. Our aim was to discern the differential impacts of fully versus partially automated AI decision support on workers' perceptions of job meaningfulness, autonomy, competence, motivation, engagement, and performance on an error-detection task. The results of this study suggest the presence of a critical boundary in automation for psychosocial factors, demonstrating that while some automation of decision selection can nurture work meaningfulness, worker autonomy, competence, self-determined motivation, and engagement, there is a pivotal point beyond which these benefits can decline. Thus, balancing AI assistance with human control is vital to protect psychosocial well-being. Practically, industry and operations managers should keep employees involved in decision making by adopting partial, confirm-or-override AI systems that sustain motivation and engagement, boosting retention and productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Passalacqua & Robert Pellerin & Florian Magnani & Laurent Joblot & Frédéric Rosin & Esma Yahia & Pierre-Majorique Léger, 2025. "Safeguarding worker psychosocial well-being in the age of AI: The critical role of decision control," Post-Print hal-05345071, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05345071
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103649
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05345071v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05345071v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Fügener & Jörn Grahl & Alok Gupta & Wolfgang Ketter, 2022. "Cognitive Challenges in Human–Artificial Intelligence Collaboration: Investigating the Path Toward Productive Delegation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 678-696, June.
    2. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, 2018. "Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 577-586.
    3. Nikolova, Milena & Cnossen, Femke & Nikolaev, Boris, 2024. "Robots, meaning, and self-determination," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(5).
    4. Thomas De Lombaert & Kris Braekers & René De Koster & Katrien Ramaekers, 2023. "In pursuit of humanised order picking planning: methodological review, literature classification and input from practice," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(10), pages 3300-3330, May.
    5. Alexandre Goujon & Frédéric Rosin & Florian Magnani & Samir Lamouri & Robert Pellerin & Laurent Joblot, 2024. "Industry 5.0 use cases development framework," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(17), pages 6064-6089, September.
    6. Etieno Enang & Mahdi Bashiri & David Jarvis, 2023. "Exploring the transition from techno centric industry 4.0 towards value centric industry 5.0: a systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(22), pages 7866-7902, November.
    7. Eric H. Grosse & Fabio Sgarbossa & Cecilia Berlin & W. Patrick Neumann, 2023. "Human-centric production and logistics system design and management: transitioning from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(22), pages 7749-7759, November.
    8. Nazareno, Luísa & Schiff, Daniel S., 2021. "The impact of automation and artificial intelligence on worker well-being," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Wilmar Schaufeli & Marisa Salanova & Vicente González-romá & Arnold Bakker, 2002. "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 71-92, March.
    10. Bruno Berberian & Jean-Christophe Sarrazin & Patrick Le Blaye & Patrick Haggard, 2012. "Automation Technology and Sense of Control: A Window on Human Agency," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-6, March.
    11. Meyer, John P. & Gagnè, Maryléne, 2008. "Employee Engagement From a Self-Determination Theory Perspective," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 60-62, March.
    12. Sgarbossa, F. & Grosse, E. H. & Neumann, W. P. & Battini, D. & Glock, C. H., 2020. "Human factors in production and logistics systems of the future," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 120615, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    13. Mario Passalacqua & Robert Pellerin & Florian Magnani & Philippe Doyon-Poulin & Laurène Del-Aguila & Jared Boasen & Pierre-Majorique Léger, 2024. "Human-centred AI in industry 5.0: a systematic review," Post-Print hal-04723054, HAL.
    14. Sarah Bankins & Paul Formosa, 2023. "The Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) For Meaningful Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(4), pages 725-740, July.
    15. Frédéric Rosin & Pascal Forget & Samir Lamouri & Robert Pellerin, 2022. "Enhancing the Decision-Making Process through Industry 4.0 Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-35, January.
    16. Monica Molino & Claudio G. Cortese & Chiara Ghislieri, 2021. "Technology Acceptance and Leadership 4.0: A Quali-Quantitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Macey, William H. & Schneider, Benjamin, 2008. "The Meaning of Employee Engagement," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 3-30, March.
    18. Monica Molino & Claudio G. Cortese & Chiara Ghislieri, 2020. "The Promotion of Technology Acceptance and Work Engagement in Industry 4.0: From Personal Resources to Information and Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Dmitry Ivanov, 2023. "The Industry 5.0 framework: viability-based integration of the resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity perspectives," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(5), pages 1683-1695, March.
    20. Shehan Jayasekera & Edward Hensel & Risa Robinson, 2021. "Feasibility of Using the Hexoskin Smart Garment for Natural Environment Observation of Respiration Topography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.
    21. Nishtha Malik & Shalini Nath Tripathi & Arpan Kumar Kar & Shivam Gupta, 2021. "Impact of artificial intelligence on employees working in industry 4.0 led organizations," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 43(2), pages 334-354, June.
    22. Mario Passalacqua & Robert Pellerin & Esma Yahia & Florian Magnani & Frédéric Rosin & Laurent Joblot & Pierre-Majorique Léger, 2024. "Practice With Less AI Makes Perfect: Partially Automated AI During Training Leads to Better Worker Motivation, Engagement, and Skill Acquisition," Post-Print hal-04487695, HAL.
    23. Winkelhaus, Sven & Grosse, Eric H. & Glock, Christoph H., 2022. "Job satisfaction: An explorative study on work characteristics changes of employees in Intralogistics 4.0," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 134375, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    24. Winkelhaus, S. & Grosse, E. H. & Glock, C. H., 2022. "Job satisfaction: An explorative study on work characteristics changes of employees in Intralogistics 4.0," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 133921, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    25. Michelle Vaccaro & Abdullah Almaatouq & Thomas Malone, 2024. "When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(12), pages 2293-2303, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Passalacqua & Robert Pellerin & Florian Magnani & Philippe Doyon-Poulin & Laurène Del-Aguila & Jared Boasen & Pierre-Majorique Léger, 2024. "Human-centred AI in industry 5.0: a systematic review," Post-Print hal-04723054, HAL.
    2. Joblot Laurent & Rosin Frédéric & Magnani Florian & Robert Pellerin & Mario Passalacqua, 2025. "LEAN et outils d'immersion à l'heure de l'Industrie 5.0: Une coexistence encore à justifier," Post-Print hal-05222863, HAL.
    3. Juliana Salvadorinho & Leonor Teixeira, 2023. "Happy and Engaged Workforce in Industry 4.0: A New Concept of Digital Tool for HR Based on Theoretical and Practical Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-29, February.
    4. Nadeem, Kashif & Wong, Sut I. & Za, Stefano & Venditti, Michelina, 2024. "Digital transformation and industry 4.0 employees: Empirical evidence from top digital nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Mario Passalacqua & Robert Pellerin & Esma Yahia & Florian Magnani & Frédéric Rosin & Laurent Joblot & Pierre-Majorique Léger, 2024. "Practice With Less AI Makes Perfect: Partially Automated AI During Training Leads to Better Worker Motivation, Engagement, and Skill Acquisition," Post-Print hal-04487695, HAL.
    6. Soane, Emma & Truss, Catherine & Alfes, Kerstin & Shantz, Amanda & Rees, Chris & Gatenby, Mark, 2012. "Development and application of a new measure of employee engagement: the ISA engagement scale," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63486, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Pakize Bilalli Abduraimi & Mirlinde Bilalli & Xhavit Islami & Fitim Macani, 2024. "Does Internal Organization Communication Enhance Employee Engagement?," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 144-165.
    8. Tilahun Kidane Diko & Shabnam Saxena, 2023. "Antecedents and outcome of employee engagement: Empirical study of Ethiopian public higher education institutions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-30, August.
    9. Loan Thi-Hong Van & Le Dang Lang & Trong Liem-Phuoc Ngo & João Ferreira, 2024. "The impact of internal social responsibility on service employees' job satisfaction and organizational engagement," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 18(1), pages 101-131, March.
    10. Nasser Saad Al Kahtani & Sulphey M. M., 2022. "A Study on How Psychological Capital, Social Capital, Workplace Wellbeing, and Employee Engagement Relate to Task Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    11. Woocheol Kim & Gohar Feroz Khan & Jacob Wood & Muhammad Tariq Mahmood, 2016. "Employee Engagement for Sustainable Organizations: Keyword Analysis Using Social Network Analysis and Burst Detection Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, July.
    12. Francoise Contreras & Juan C. Espinosa & Gustavo A. Esguerra, 2020. "Could Personal Resources Influence Work Engagement and Burnout? A Study in a Group of Nursing Staff," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    13. Sajid Hussain Awan & Nazia Habib & Chaudhry Shoaib Akhtar & Shaheryar Naveed, 2020. "Effectiveness of Performance Management System for Employee Performance Through Engagement," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    14. Nina Pološki Vokić & Tomislav Hernaus, 2015. "The triad of job satisfaction, work engagement and employee loyalty – The interplay among the concepts," EFZG Working Papers Series 1507, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb.
    15. Carla Mascarenhas & Anderson Rei Galvão & Carla Susana Marques, 2022. "How Perceived Organizational Support, Identification with Organization and Work Engagement Influence Job Satisfaction: A Gender-Based Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Antonino Callea & Amelia Manuti, 2022. "“I Like It like That”: A Study on the Relationship between Psychological Capital, Work Engagement and Extra-Role Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Urmila Rani Srivastava & Vandana Maurya, 2017. "Organizational and Individual Level Antecedents of Psychological Capital and its Associated Outcomes: Development of a Conceptual Framework," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 42(3), pages 205-236, August.
    18. S. G. Yapa & G. D. N Perera & P. Jayasekara, 2025. "Employee Engagement in Smart Factories: Research Gaps and a Nomological Framework for the Sri Lankan Apparel Sector," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 4538-4549, September.
    19. Andrea Caputo & Paola Gatti & Marco Clari & Giacomo Garzaro & Valerio Dimonte & Claudio Giovanni Cortese, 2023. "Leaders’ Role in Shaping Followers’ Well-Being: Crossover in a Sample of Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Leonel Prieto & Muhammad Ruhul Amin & Arman Canatay, 2022. "Examining Social Sustainability in Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-43, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05345071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.