Author
Listed:
- Mario Passalacqua
(UQAM - Université du Québec à Montréal = University of Québec in Montréal)
- Robert Pellerin
(MAGI - Département de Mathématiques et de Génie Industriel - EPM - École Polytechnique de Montréal)
- Florian Magnani
(MAGELLAN - Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)
- Laurent Joblot
(LISPEN - Laboratoire d’Ingénierie des Systèmes Physiques et Numériques - Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies)
- Frédéric Rosin
(LISPEN - Laboratoire d’Ingénierie des Systèmes Physiques et Numériques - Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies)
- Esma Yahia
(LISPEN - Laboratoire d’Ingénierie des Systèmes Physiques et Numériques - Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies)
- Pierre-Majorique Léger
(HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal)
Abstract
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have ushered in the era of the fourth industrial revolution, transforming workplace dynamics with AI's enhanced decision-making capabilities. While AI has been shown to reduce worker mental workload, improve performance, and enhance physical safety, it also has the potential to negatively impact psychosocial factors, such as work meaningfulness, worker autonomy, and motivation, among others. These factors are crucial as they impact employee retention, well-being, and organizational performance. Yet, the impact of automating decision-making aspects of work on the psychosocial dimension of human-AI interaction remains largely unknown due to the lack of empirical evidence. To address this gap, our study conducted an experiment with 102 participants in a laboratory designed to replicate a manufacturing line. We manipulated the level of AI decision support-characterized by the AI's decision-making control-to observe its effects on worker psychosocial factors through a blend of perceptual, physiological, and observational measures. Our aim was to discern the differential impacts of fully versus partially automated AI decision support on workers' perceptions of job meaningfulness, autonomy, competence, motivation, engagement, and performance on an error-detection task. The results of this study suggest the presence of a critical boundary in automation for psychosocial factors, demonstrating that while some automation of decision selection can nurture work meaningfulness, worker autonomy, competence, self-determined motivation, and engagement, there is a pivotal point beyond which these benefits can decline. Thus, balancing AI assistance with human control is vital to protect psychosocial well-being. Practically, industry and operations managers should keep employees involved in decision making by adopting partial, confirm-or-override AI systems that sustain motivation and engagement, boosting retention and productivity.
Suggested Citation
Mario Passalacqua & Robert Pellerin & Florian Magnani & Laurent Joblot & Frédéric Rosin & Esma Yahia & Pierre-Majorique Léger, 2025.
"Safeguarding worker psychosocial well-being in the age of AI: The critical role of decision control,"
Post-Print
hal-05345071, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05345071
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103649
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05345071v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05345071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.