Author
Abstract
In online product search, returned alternatives often look alike. We investigate when a product's visual separation from its closest look-alike in a returned set increases its choice probability. We introduce two occasion-level constructs: contextual visual distinctiveness (image distance from the nearest similar alternative in the consideration set) and relative fit (compatibility with the search query). We hypothesize that distinctiveness favors selection and is highly contextual, yields a premium that rises with relative fit, and matters most when text descriptions fail to differentiate options. Analyzing over 800,000 e-commerce search events using dense representations, we apply search-event and product fixed effects to evaluate the exact same product alongside varying visual neighbors. Results show a product is significantly more likely to be clicked when it lacks a close look-alike. This distinctiveness premium increases with relative fit and roughly doubles when competing descriptions are highly similar. Consistent with a model where distinctiveness aids in standing out pre-evaluation rather than increasing inherent utility, the extra clicks distinctiveness recruits convert 5-7% less often downstream. Ultimately, the evidence characterizes visual differentiation as a local attention allocation mechanism whose value depends on query fit and information from competing cues.
Suggested Citation
Felicia Nguyen, 2026.
"Contextual Visual Distinctiveness in Online Product Search,"
Papers
2608.21691, arXiv.org.
Handle:
RePEc:arx:papers:2608.21691
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.21691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.