IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.10664.html

Commitment and the dynamics of household labor supply: new tests and evidence from Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre-Andre Chiappori
  • Alexandros Theloudis
  • Jorge Velilla
  • Jose Ignacio Gimenez-Nadal
  • Jose Alberto Molina

Abstract

The ability of spouses to commit to future behavior has important implications for the allocation of resources between them and over time. Using a lifecycle collective model for household behavior, we propose new tests that distinguish between full, limited, and no commitment, based on the dynamic impact of wage shocks on household labor supply. A novelty of our approach is its ability to formally reject limited commitment, in addition to the other two types, exploiting sign restrictions from theory. We implement our tests across 15 European countries, drawing data from the EU-SILC over the years 2005-2019. We find that the elasticity of the Pareto weight with respect to favorable past wages is generally positive, consistent with bargaining under limited commitment. Past wage shocks thus induce bargaining effects on labor supply, empowering the recipient spouse and weakening the partner. Formally, we reject full and no commitment in all but 4 countries, but fail to reject limited commitment.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre-Andre Chiappori & Alexandros Theloudis & Jorge Velilla & Jose Ignacio Gimenez-Nadal & Jose Alberto Molina, 2026. "Commitment and the dynamics of household labor supply: new tests and evidence from Europe," Papers 2606.10664, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.10664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.10664
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.10664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.