IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joamsc/v53y2025i1d10.1007_s11747-024-01043-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network centrality and firm performance: A meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mehdi Nezami

    (Bradley University)

  • Natalie Chisam

    (University of Nebraska–Lincoln)

  • Robert W. Palmatier

    (University of Washington, PACCAR Hall)

Abstract

This study offers a comprehensive view of the network centrality–firm performance relationship through a meta-analysis. Drawing on a data set of 1,699 effect sizes retrieved from 147 studies published during 2000–2022, the authors establish a positive association between degree, closeness, betweenness, and eigenvector measures of centrality with firm performance on average. Nevertheless, these measures show significant differences in their effectiveness across various contexts. While the associations of degree, closeness, and betweenness centralities with firm performance have diminished over time, the relationship between eigenvector centrality and performance has strengthened. Moreover, the linkage between degree centrality and overall performance is more pronounced in customer-oriented and larger markets, whereas closeness centrality demonstrates a stronger relationship with overall performance in larger markets. Also, social trust amplifies the relationships of degree, closeness, and betweenness centralities with overall performance. Furthermore, the centrality–performance linkage and the moderating effects of the contingency factors depend at least partially on the type of network (i.e., board interlock vs. alliance vs. supplier–customer) and the measure of firm performance used (i.e., innovation vs. financial outcomes). Incorporating these factors into social network analyses helps managers refine their networking strategies and enables scholars to improve the generalizability of their findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehdi Nezami & Natalie Chisam & Robert W. Palmatier, 2025. "Network centrality and firm performance: A meta-analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 79-104, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:53:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11747-024-01043-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11747-024-01043-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11747-024-01043-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11747-024-01043-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bloom & Luis Garicano & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2014. "The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2859-2885, December.
    2. Stuart, Toby E. & Yim, Soojin, 2010. "Board interlocks and the propensity to be targeted in private equity transactions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 174-189, July.
    3. Tao, Qizhi & Li, Haoyu & Wu, Qun & Zhang, Ting & Zhu, Yingjun, 2019. "The dark side of board network centrality: Evidence from merger performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 215-232.
    4. Marie Louise Mors, 2010. "Innovation in a global consulting firm: when the problem is too much diversity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(8), pages 841-872, August.
    5. Larcker, David F. & So, Eric C. & Wang, Charles C.Y., 2013. "Boardroom centrality and firm performance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 225-250.
    6. John Hagedoorn, 1993. "Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 371-385, July.
    7. Olga A. Novoselova, 2022. "What matters for interorganizational connectedness? : Locating the drivers of multiplex corporate networks," Post-Print hal-04325541, HAL.
    8. Gurneeta Vasudeva & Akbar Zaheer & Exequiel Hernandez, 2013. "The Embeddedness of Networks: Institutions, Structural Holes, and Innovativeness in the Fuel Cell Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 645-663, June.
    9. Akbar Zaheer & Geoffrey G. Bell, 2005. "Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(9), pages 809-825, September.
    10. Mani, Sudha & Luo, Xueming, 2015. "Product alliances, alliance networks, and shareholder value: Evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 9-22.
    11. Olga A. Novoselova, 2022. "What matters for interorganizational connectedness? Locating the drivers of multiplex corporate networks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 872-899, April.
    12. Balaji R. Koka & John E. Prescott, 2008. "Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 639-661, June.
    13. Manuel E. Sosa, 2011. "Where Do Creative Interactions Come From? The Role of Tie Content and Social Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Watts, Jameson K.M. & Koput, Kenneth W., 2019. "The downside of prominence in a network of marketing alliances," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 196-205.
    15. Jared F. Egginton & William R. McCumber, 2019. "Executive Network Centrality and Stock Liquidity," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 48(3), pages 849-871, September.
    16. (Daniel) Kao, Ta-Wei & Su, Hung-Chung & Chen, Yi-Su, 2019. "The curvilinear relationships between structural embeddedness and productive efficiency: An exploratory study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 176-185.
    17. Forrest Briscoe & Michelle Rogan, 2016. "Coordinating Complex Work: Knowledge Networks, Partner Departures, and Client Relationship Performance in a Law Firm," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2392-2411, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haifeng Wang & Longwei Tian & Yuan Li, 2019. "A tale of two cultures: Social networks and competitive advantage," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 321-347, June.
    2. Elio Shijaku & Martin Larraza-Kintana & Ainhoa Urtasun-Alonso, 2020. "Network centrality and organizational aspirations: A behavioral interaction in the context of international strategic alliances," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(5), pages 813-828, July.
    3. Peng, Zixuan & Sha, Haowei & Lan, Hongxing & Chen, Xudong, 2019. "Cross-shareholding and financing constraints of private firms: Based on the perspective of social network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 520(C), pages 381-389.
    4. Shi, Jinyan & Yang, Jianheng & Li, Yanxi, 2020. "Does supply network location affect corporate investment efficiency?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Hongjuan Zhang & Liang Wang & Rong Han, 2019. "The China-West divide on social capital: A meta-analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 745-772, September.
    6. Bilitis Schoonjans & Philippe Cauwenberge & Heidi Bauwhede, 2013. "Formal business networking and SME growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 169-181, June.
    7. Teng, Ying & Ma, Zhenzhong & Liang, Dapeng & Song, Shenyi & Zheng, Yuhang, 2024. "The moderating effect of national culture on board interlocks’ impact on firm performance: A meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    8. Wang, Shusheng & Yan, Yan & Li, Haitong & Wang, Baolin, 2024. "Whom you know matters: Network structure, industrial environment and digital orientation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    9. Zhong, Shihu & Guo, Fanyong & Zhang, Gexing & Fan, Youqing, 2024. "Role of potential power: The effect of part-time board secretary on merger decisions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 285-298.
    10. Chen, Zonghao & Keefe, Michael O'Connor & Watts, Jameson K.M., 2020. "Board of director compensation in China: It pays to be connected," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Mazzola, Erica & Perrone, Giovanni & Kamuriwo, Dzidziso Samuel, 2016. "The interaction between inter-firm and interlocking directorate networks on firm's new product development outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 672-682.
    12. Li, Wenqin & Benkraiem, Ramzi & Ding, Rong & Saadi, Samir & Zhang, Ziyang (John), 2024. "Board centrality and environmental disclosures: Evidence from the polluting Industries in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    13. Rojas, Mariana Giovanna Andrade & Solis, Edgar Rogelio Ramirez & Zhu, John JianJun, 2018. "Innovation and network multiplexity: R&D and the concurrent effects of two collaboration networks in an emerging economy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1111-1124.
    14. Kun Chen & Xin Li & Peng Luo & J. Leon Zhao, 2021. "News-Induced Dynamic Networks for Market Signaling: Understanding the Impact of News on Firm Equity Value," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 356-377, June.
    15. Lite J. Nartey & Witold J. Henisz & Sinziana Dorobantu, 2018. "Status Climbing vs. Bridging: Multinational Stakeholder Engagement Strategies," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 367-392, June.
    16. Tinic, Murat & Sensoy, Ahmet & Demir, Muge & Nguyen, Duc Khuong, 2020. "Broker Network Connectivity and the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," MPRA Paper 104719, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar & Chowdhury, Hasibul & Han, Hien Duc, 2021. "CEO centrality and stock price crash risk," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    18. Dhayanithy, Deepak & Mukherjee, Subhasree, 2020. "Network memory, cultural distance and the ebb and flow of international resources – Evidence from 20 years of professional player transfers to big-five European soccer leagues," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 255-266.
    19. Richard W. Carney & Travers Barclay Child, 2015. "Business Networks and Crisis Performance: Professional, Political, and Family Ties," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-135/V, Tinbergen Institute, revised 20 Feb 2015.
    20. Chen, Feiqiong & Liu, Huiqian & Ge, Yuhao, 2021. "How does integration affect industrial innovation through networks in technology-sourcing overseas M&A? A comparison between China and the US," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 281-292.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joamsc:v:53:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11747-024-01043-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.