IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/fininn/v5y2019i1d10.1186_s40854-019-0140-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio optimization by improved NSGA-II and SPEA 2 based on different risk measures

Author

Listed:
  • Massimiliano Kaucic

    (University of Trieste, Piazzale Europa 1)

  • Mojtaba Moradi

    (University of Guilan)

  • Mohmmad Mirzazadeh

    (University of Guilan)

Abstract

In this study, we analyze three portfolio selection strategies for loss-averse investors: semi-variance, conditional value-at-risk, and a combination of both risk measures. Moreover, we propose a novel version of the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II and of the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 2 to tackle this optimization problem. The effectiveness of these algorithms is compared with two alternatives from the literature from five publicly available datasets. The computational results indicate that the proposed algorithms in this study outperform the others for all the examined performance metrics. Moreover, they are able to approximate the Pareto front even in cases in which all the other approaches fail.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimiliano Kaucic & Mojtaba Moradi & Mohmmad Mirzazadeh, 2019. "Portfolio optimization by improved NSGA-II and SPEA 2 based on different risk measures," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-28, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:fininn:v:5:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-019-0140-6
    DOI: 10.1186/s40854-019-0140-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40854-019-0140-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40854-019-0140-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Crama, Y. & Schyns, M., 2003. "Simulated annealing for complex portfolio selection problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(3), pages 546-571, November.
    2. Hogan, William W. & Warren, James M., 1972. "Computation of the Efficient Boundary in the E-S Portfolio Selection Model," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 1881-1896, September.
    3. Acerbi, Carlo & Tasche, Dirk, 2002. "On the coherence of expected shortfall," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1487-1503, July.
    4. Huang, Yan & Kou, Gang & Peng, Yi, 2017. "Nonlinear manifold learning for early warnings in financial markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 692-702.
    5. Woodside-Oriakhi, M. & Lucas, C. & Beasley, J.E., 2011. "Heuristic algorithms for the cardinality constrained efficient frontier," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(3), pages 538-550, September.
    6. Thiemo Krink & Sandra Paterlini, 2011. "Multiobjective optimization using differential evolution for real-world portfolio optimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 157-179, April.
    7. K. Liagkouras & K. Metaxiotis, 2015. "Efficient Portfolio Construction with the Use of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Best Practices and Performance Metrics," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 535-564.
    8. Fishburn, Peter C, 1977. "Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below-Target Returns," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 116-126, March.
    9. Yamai, Yasuhiro & Yoshiba, Toshinao, 2002. "Comparative Analyses of Expected Shortfall and Value-at-Risk: Their Estimation Error, Decomposition, and Optimization," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 20(1), pages 87-121, January.
    10. Churlzu Lim & Hanif Sherali & Stan Uryasev, 2010. "Portfolio optimization by minimizing conditional value-at-risk via nondifferentiable optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 391-415, July.
    11. Gunter Dueck & Peter Winker, 1992. "New concepts and algorithms for portfolio choice," Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(3), pages 159-178, September.
    12. Cumova, Denisa & Nawrocki, David, 2011. "A symmetric LPM model for heuristic mean-semivariance analysis," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 217-236, May.
    13. M. Gilli & E. Kellezi & H. Hysi, 2006. "A Data-Driven Optimization Heuristic for Downside Risk Minimization," Computing in Economics and Finance 2006 355, Society for Computational Economics.
    14. Chen, Yan & Wang, Xuancheng, 2015. "A hybrid stock trading system using genetic network programming and mean conditional value-at-risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 861-871.
    15. Enrique Ballestero & David Pla-Santamaria, 2005. "Grading the performance of market indicators with utility benchmarks selected from Footsie: a 2000 case study," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(18), pages 2147-2160.
    16. Zhang, Huanhuan & Kou, Gang & Peng, Yi, 2019. "Soft consensus cost models for group decision making and economic interpretations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 964-980.
    17. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    18. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masoud Rahiminezhad Galankashi & Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei & Maryam Ghezelbash, 2020. "Portfolio selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-34, December.
    2. Jaydip Sen & Abhishek Dutta, 2022. "Design and Analysis of Optimized Portfolios for Selected Sectors of the Indian Stock Market," Papers 2210.03943, arXiv.org.
    3. Georgios Mamanis, 2021. "Analyzing the Performance of a Two-Tail-Measures-Utility Multi-objective Portfolio Optimization Model," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Bedoui, Rihab & Benkraiem, Ramzi & Guesmi, Khaled & Kedidi, Islem, 2023. "Portfolio optimization through hybrid deep learning and genetic algorithms vine Copula-GARCH-EVT-CVaR model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. A. Garcia-Bernabeu & J. V. Salcedo & A. Hilario & D. Pla-Santamaria & Juan M. Herrero, 2019. "Computing the Mean-Variance-Sustainability Nondominated Surface by ev-MOGA," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, December.
    6. Abhiraj Sen & Jaydip Sen, 2023. "Performance Evaluation of Equal-Weight Portfolio and Optimum Risk Portfolio on Indian Stocks," Papers 2309.13696, arXiv.org.
    7. Marco Di Francesco, 2021. "Portfolio optimization under solvency II: a multi-objective approach incorporating market views and real-world constraints," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(1), pages 269-294, June.
    8. Yin, Hao & Wu, Fei & Meng, Xin & Lin, Yicheng & Fan, Jingmin & Meng, Anbo, 2020. "Crisscross optimization based short-term hydrothermal generation scheduling with cascaded reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    9. Massimiliano Kaucic & Filippo Piccotto & Gabriele Sbaiz & Giorgio Valentinuz, 2023. "Optimal Portfolio with Sustainable Attitudes under Cumulative Prospect Theory," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 13(4), pages 1-4.
    10. Adolfo Hilario-Caballero & Ana Garcia-Bernabeu & Jose Vicente Salcedo & Marisa Vercher, 2020. "Tri-Criterion Model for Constructing Low-Carbon Mutual Fund Portfolios: A Preference-Based Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mansini, Renata & Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2014. "Twenty years of linear programming based portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 518-535.
    2. Albrecht, Peter, 2003. "Risk measures," Papers 03-01, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    3. Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos & Georgios Mamanis, 2011. "Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for complex portfolio optimization problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 259-279, August.
    4. Karma, Otto & Sander, Priit, 2006. "The impact of financial leverage on risk of equity measured by loss-oriented risk measures: An option pricing approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1340-1356, December.
    5. Lwin, Khin T. & Qu, Rong & MacCarthy, Bart L., 2017. "Mean-VaR portfolio optimization: A nonparametric approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 751-766.
    6. Ruili Sun & Tiefeng Ma & Shuangzhe Liu & Milind Sathye, 2019. "Improved Covariance Matrix Estimation for Portfolio Risk Measurement: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-34, March.
    7. Philippe Delquié, 2012. "Risk Measures from Risk-Reducing Experiments," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 96-102, June.
    8. Mario Brandtner, 2016. "Spektrale Risikomaße: Konzeption, betriebswirtschaftliche Anwendungen und Fallstricke," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 75-115, April.
    9. Gianni Filograsso & Giacomo Tollo, 2023. "Adaptive evolutionary algorithms for portfolio selection problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-38, December.
    10. Fulga, Cristinca, 2016. "Portfolio optimization under loss aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 310-322.
    11. Chen, Zhiping & Wang, Yi, 2008. "Two-sided coherent risk measures and their application in realistic portfolio optimization," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 2667-2673, December.
    12. Giannopoulos, Kostas & Tunaru, Radu, 2005. "Coherent risk measures under filtered historical simulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 979-996, April.
    13. Mohammed Bilal Girach & Shashank Oberoi & Siddhartha P. Chakrabarty, 2021. "Is Being “Robust” Beneficial? A Perspective from the Indian Market," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 28(4), pages 469-497, December.
    14. Mohammed Bilal Girach & Shashank Oberoi & Siddhartha P. Chakrabarty, 2019. "Is being `Robust' beneficial?: A perspective from the Indian market," Papers 1908.05002, arXiv.org.
    15. Kull, Andreas, 2009. "Sharing Risk – An Economic Perspective," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 591-613, November.
    16. Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2005. "On the Value of Mix Flexibility and Dual Sourcing in Unreliable Newsvendor Networks," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 37-57, June.
    17. Harris, Richard D.F. & Mazibas, Murat, 2013. "Dynamic hedge fund portfolio construction: A semi-parametric approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 139-149.
    18. Fermanian, Jean-David & Scaillet, Olivier, 2005. "Sensitivity analysis of VaR and Expected Shortfall for portfolios under netting agreements," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 927-958, April.
    19. Maziar Sahamkhadam, 2021. "Dynamic copula-based expectile portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 209-223, May.
    20. Martin Herdegen & Cosimo Munari, 2023. "An elementary proof of the dual representation of Expected Shortfall," Papers 2306.14506, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fininn:v:5:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-019-0140-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.