IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snopef/v2y2021i4d10.1007_s43069-021-00106-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Performance of a Two-Tail-Measures-Utility Multi-objective Portfolio Optimization Model

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios Mamanis

    (CGSoft)

Abstract

This research paper proposes and experimentally investigates the out-of-sample performance of a multi(three)-objective portfolio optimization model. The three objectives used to evaluate the return distribution of the portfolio are two tail performance measures and a utility function in order to evaluate the middle part of the return distribution. Five different utility functions are considered, thus forming five instances of the proposed multi-objective portfolio selection model. For solving the problem, a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, namely Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (SPEA2), was employed. The results show that the majority of the portfolios generated by the solution technique produce better portfolios than S&P 500 Index considering the final wealth, Sharpe ratio, and Sortino ratio. The five portfolio models defined by different utility functions return, on average, approximately 10% more than the return on S&P 500 Index for an evaluation period of one and a half year. Furthermore, the computational results show that the proposed multi-objective portfolio optimization models are competitive to portfolios that have shown good out-of-sample performance in past studies, like the minimum variance portfolio with and without short sales and the second-order stochastic dominance portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios Mamanis, 2021. "Analyzing the Performance of a Two-Tail-Measures-Utility Multi-objective Portfolio Optimization Model," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:2:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-021-00106-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s43069-021-00106-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43069-021-00106-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43069-021-00106-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louis K.C. Chan & Jason Karceski & Josef Lakonishok, 1999. "On Portfolio Optimization: Forecasting Covariances and Choosing the Risk Model," NBER Working Papers 7039, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Acerbi, Carlo & Tasche, Dirk, 2002. "On the coherence of expected shortfall," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1487-1503, July.
    3. Massimiliano Kaucic & Mojtaba Moradi & Mohmmad Mirzazadeh, 2019. "Portfolio optimization by improved NSGA-II and SPEA 2 based on different risk measures," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-28, December.
    4. De Giorgi, Enrico, 2005. "Reward-risk portfolio selection and stochastic dominance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 895-926, April.
    5. Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos & Georgios Mamanis, 2011. "Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for complex portfolio optimization problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 259-279, August.
    6. Timo Kuosmanen, 2004. "Efficient Diversification According to Stochastic Dominance Criteria," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1390-1406, October.
    7. A. Garcia-Bernabeu & J. V. Salcedo & A. Hilario & D. Pla-Santamaria & Juan M. Herrero, 2019. "Computing the Mean-Variance-Sustainability Nondominated Surface by ev-MOGA," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, December.
    8. Andrew L. Turner & Eric J. Weigel, 1992. "Daily Stock Market Volatility: 1928--1989," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(11), pages 1586-1609, November.
    9. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    10. Benoit Mandelbrot, 2015. "The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Anastasios G Malliaris & William T Ziemba (ed.), THE WORLD SCIENTIFIC HANDBOOK OF FUTURES MARKETS, chapter 3, pages 39-78, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Chan, Louis K C & Karceski, Jason & Lakonishok, Josef, 1999. "On Portfolio Optimization: Forecasting Covariances and Choosing the Risk Model," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(5), pages 937-974.
    12. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goh, Joel Weiqiang & Lim, Kian Guan & Sim, Melvyn & Zhang, Weina, 2012. "Portfolio value-at-risk optimization for asymmetrically distributed asset returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 397-406.
    2. Maria Scutellà & Raffaella Recchia, 2013. "Robust portfolio asset allocation and risk measures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 145-169, April.
    3. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K Hassani, 2014. "Distortion Risk Measures or the Transformation of Unimodal Distributions into Multimodal Functions," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14008, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    4. Taras Bodnar & Mathias Lindholm & Erik Thorsén & Joanna Tyrcha, 2021. "Quantile-based optimal portfolio selection," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 299-324, July.
    5. Grechuk, Bogdan & Zabarankin, Michael, 2018. "Direct data-based decision making under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 200-211.
    6. Ruili Sun & Tiefeng Ma & Shuangzhe Liu & Milind Sathye, 2019. "Improved Covariance Matrix Estimation for Portfolio Risk Measurement: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-34, March.
    7. Somayyeh Lotfi & Stavros A. Zenios, 2024. "Robust mean-to-CVaR optimization under ambiguity in distributions means and covariance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(7), pages 2115-2140, July.
    8. Burzoni, Matteo & Munari, Cosimo & Wang, Ruodu, 2022. "Adjusted Expected Shortfall," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Al Janabi, Mazin A.M., 2014. "Optimal and investable portfolios: An empirical analysis with scenario optimization algorithms under crisis market prospects," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 369-381.
    10. Brianna Cain & Ralf Zurbruegg, 2010. "Can switching between risk measures lead to better portfolio optimization?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(6), pages 358-369, February.
    11. Bauerle, Nicole & Muller, Alfred, 2006. "Stochastic orders and risk measures: Consistency and bounds," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 132-148, February.
    12. Roumpis, Efthymios & Syriopoulos, Theodore, 2014. "Dynamics and risk factors in hedge funds returns: Implications for portfolio construction and performance evaluation," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 58-77.
    13. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand Hassani, 2014. "Distortion Risk Measures or the Transformation of Unimodal Distributions into Multimodal Functions," Post-Print halshs-00969242, HAL.
    14. Víctor M. Adame-García & Fernando Fernández-Rodríguez & Simón Sosvilla-Rivero, "undated". "Portfolios in the Ibex 35 index: Alternative methods to the traditional framework, a comparative with the naive diversification in a pre- and post- crisis context," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2015-07, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico, revised Jun 2015.
    15. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    16. Víctor Adame-García & Fernando Fernández-Rodríguez & Simón Sosvilla-Rivero, 2017. "“Resolution of optimization problems and construction of efficient portfolios: An application to the Euro Stoxx 50 index"," IREA Working Papers 201702, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Feb 2017.
    17. Adabi Firouzjaee , Bagher & Mehrara , Mohsen & Mohammadi , Shapour, 2014. "Optimal Portfolio Selection for Tehran Stock Exchange Using Conditional, Partitioned and Worst-case Value at Risk Measures," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 9(1), pages 1-30, October.
    18. Adam, Alexandre & Houkari, Mohamed & Laurent, Jean-Paul, 2008. "Spectral risk measures and portfolio selection," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1870-1882, September.
    19. Marco Rocco, 2011. "Extreme value theory for finance: a survey," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 99, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    20. Kull, Andreas, 2009. "Sharing Risk – An Economic Perspective," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 591-613, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:2:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-021-00106-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.