IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v58y2023ipds1544612323009248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective portfolio selection considering expected and total utility

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Xianhe
  • Ouyang, Yuliang
  • Li, You
  • Liu, Shu
  • Teng, Long
  • Wang, Bo

Abstract

To address the challenge of risk minimization associated with investors’ irrational investment decisions in the face of wealth fluctuations, this article integrates prospect theory and disappointment theory into the framework of multi-objective portfolio selection. By concurrently incorporating prospect theory and disappointment theory, this conceptual framework not only considers emotional factors but also offers a comprehensive depiction of individuals’ decision-making processes amidst uncertainty. The proposed portfolio selection model aims to balance return and risk by maximizing both expected and total utility. The effectiveness of the proposed model is validated through comparisons with three other methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Xianhe & Ouyang, Yuliang & Li, You & Liu, Shu & Teng, Long & Wang, Bo, 2023. "Multi-objective portfolio selection considering expected and total utility," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PD).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:58:y:2023:i:pd:s1544612323009248
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612323009248
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fuzzy portfolio selection; Expected utility; Prospect theory; Disappointment theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:58:y:2023:i:pd:s1544612323009248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.