IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05357-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizens’ expectations about public services: a systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Zengqiang Qin

    (Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)

  • Bingsheng Liu

    (Chongqing University
    Hebei University of Technology)

  • Yuequn Cao

    (Minzu University of China)

  • Chong Xu

    (Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)

  • Jinfeng Zhang

    (Chongqing University)

Abstract

Citizens hold varying expectations and demands regarding the quality, performance, and efficiency of public services. How governments respond to citizens’ expectations about public services (CEPS) to increase trust and satisfaction with government has been a consistently important research topic. However, the existing literature lacks a holistic understanding of CEPS. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this article presents a systematic review of 119 studies conducted between 1978 and 2023, exploring conceptual ambiguities, conflicting typologies, and inconsistent findings on CEPS in public service settings. Importantly, this study identifies a discourse explaining the antecedents and consequences of CEPS, which encompasses five broad categories: individual, political, organizational, economic, and technological factors related to CEPS. Expectations are diverse and dynamic, and understanding their role in governance requires linking them to broader factors, particularly the adoption of modern technology. These findings have important implications for research and practice in government trust and public service satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Zengqiang Qin & Bingsheng Liu & Yuequn Cao & Chong Xu & Jinfeng Zhang, 2025. "Citizens’ expectations about public services: a systematic literature review," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05357-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05357-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05357-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05357-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isaac Kofi Mensah & Samuel Adams, 2020. "A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Political Trust on the Adoption of E-Government Services," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 682-696, June.
    2. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    3. Isaac Kofi Mensah, 2019. "Factors Influencing the Intention of University Students to Adopt and Use E-Government Services: An Empirical Evidence in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    4. Shin-Yuan Hung & Kuanchin Chen & Yi-Kuan Su, 2020. "The effect of communication and social motives on E-government services through social media groups," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 741-757, July.
    5. Charles F. Manski, 2004. "Measuring Expectations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(5), pages 1329-1376, September.
    6. Carter, David L., 1985. "Hispanic perception of police performance: An empirical assessment," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 487-500.
    7. Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen & Gregory A. Porumbescu, 2017. "Reconsidering the expectancy disconfirmation model. Three experimental replications," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(9), pages 1272-1292, October.
    8. Dukyun Hwang & Soonae Park, 2023. "An exploratory study of factors influencing expectations of government: considering expectation types," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 156-175, April.
    9. Robert Piehler & Bernd W. Wirtz & Peter Daiser, 2016. "An Analysis of Continuity Intentions of eGovernment Portal Users," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 163-198, February.
    10. Sjors Overman, 2016. "Great Expectations of Public Service Delegation: A systematic review," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 1238-1262, September.
    11. Steven Schack & Robert S. Frank, 1978. "Police Service Delivery to the Elderly," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 438(1), pages 81-95, July.
    12. Hanumantha Rao Sama & Long-Sheng Chen & Venkateswarlu Nalluri & Madhavaiah Chendragiri, 2023. "Enhancing service quality of rural public transport during the COVID-19 pandemic: a novel fuzzy approach," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 479-501, June.
    13. Gregg G. Van Ryzin, 2004. "Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 433-448.
    14. Wannasiri Bhuasiri & Hangjung Zo & Hwansoo Lee & Andrew P. Ciganek, 2016. "User Acceptance of e-government Services: Examining an e-tax Filing and Payment System in Thailand," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 672-695, October.
    15. Emily Chamlee-Wright & Virgil Storr, 2010. "Expectations of government’s response to disaster," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 253-274, July.
    16. van Raaij, W. Fred, 1989. "Economic news, expectations and macro-economic behaviour," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 473-493.
    17. King, Gary & Wand, Jonathan, 2007. "Comparing Incomparable Survey Responses: Evaluating and Selecting Anchoring Vignettes," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 46-66, January.
    18. Mohamed Mahmood & Vishanth Weerakkody & Weifeng Chen, 2019. "The influence of transformed government on citizen trust: insights from Bahrain," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 275-303, April.
    19. Barry Bozeman, 2019. "Public values: citizens’ perspective," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 817-838, June.
    20. Weerakkody, Vishanth & El-Haddadeh, Ramzi & Al-Sobhi, Faris & Shareef, Mahmud Akhter & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2013. "Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 716-725.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zongfeng Sun & Jintao Li, 2019. "Citizens’ Satisfaction with Air Quality and Key Factors in China—Using the Anchoring Vignettes Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Weijie Wang & Taek Kyu Kim, 2024. "Do government performance signals affect citizen satisfaction?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 846-870, June.
    3. Parul Gupta & Apeksha Hooda & Anand Jeyaraj & Jonathan J.M. Seddon & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2025. "Trust, Risk, Privacy and Security in e-Government Use: Insights from a MASEM Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 1089-1105, June.
    4. Morten Hjortskov, 2020. "Interpreting expectations: Normative and predictive expectations from the citizens’ viewpoint," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    5. Morten Hjortskov, 2021. "Personality traits in citizen expectations towards public services," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 4(1).
    6. David M. Ritzwoller & Joseph P. Romano, 2019. "Uncertainty in the Hot Hand Fallacy: Detecting Streaky Alternatives to Random Bernoulli Sequences," Papers 1908.01406, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    7. Bernhardt, Lea & Dewenter, Ralf & Thomas, Tobias, 2023. "Measuring partisan media bias in US newscasts from 2001 to 2012," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Zeng, Ying & Liu, Xinyi & Zhang, Xinyuan & Li, Zhiyong, 2024. "Retrospective of interdisciplinary research on robot services (1954–2023): From parasitism to symbiosis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Ada P. Smith & Sechindra Vallury & Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf, 2023. "Social dimensions of adaptation to climate change in rangelands: a systematic literature review," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(12), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Sandra Ludwig & Julia Nafziger, 2011. "Beliefs about overconfidence," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 475-500, April.
    11. Ralph Stinebrickner & Todd R. Stinebrickner, 2014. "A Major in Science? Initial Beliefs and Final Outcomes for College Major and Dropout," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 81(1), pages 426-472.
    12. David, Paul A. & Shapiro, Joseph S., 2008. "Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 364-398, December.
    13. Merve Anaç & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp & Kamil Erdayandi, 2023. "Prefabricated Construction Risks: A Holistic Exploration through Advanced Bibliometric Tool and Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-31, August.
    14. Jones, Lindsey & d'Errico, Marco, 2019. "Whose resilience matters? Like-for-like comparison of objective and subjective evaluations of resilience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Kapteyn, Arie & Kleinjans, Kristin J. & van Soest, Arthur, 2009. "Intertemporal consumption with directly measured welfare functions and subjective expectations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 425-437, October.
    16. Nicholas Bloom & Luis Garicano & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2014. "The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2859-2885, December.
    17. Engelberg, Joseph & Manski, Charles F. & Williams, Jared, 2009. "Comparing the Point Predictions and Subjective Probability Distributions of Professional Forecasters," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 27, pages 30-41.
    18. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Huyen Thanh T. Nguyen & Thanh-Hang Pham & Manh-Toan Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2021. "Assessing the ideological homogeneity in entrepreneurial finance research by highly cited publications," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Joan Costa-Font & Cristina Vilaplana-Prieto, 2022. "Biased survival expectations and behaviours: Does domain specific information matter?," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 285-317, December.
    20. Yu-Chuan Chen & Yung-Ho Chiu & Tzu-Han Chang & Tai-Yu Lin, 2023. "Sustainable Development, Government Efficiency, and People’s Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1549-1578, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05357-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/palcomms/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.