IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v15y2004i2p221-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rewards-Allocation Preferences of Chinese Employees in the New Millennium: The Effects of Ownership Reform, Collectivism, and Goal Priority

Author

Listed:
  • Wei He

    (Organizational Department, College of Business, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana 47809)

  • Chao C. Chen

    (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 111 Washington Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102)

  • Lihua Zhang

    (Department of Public Administration, School of Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China)

Abstract

The ownership restructuring of Chinese state-owned enterprises, launched in 1992, has been one of the most radical and far-reaching market-oriented reforms in the Chinese economy. We studied the effects of ownership reform and individuals' collectivist values on rewards-allocation preferences of employees in Chinese state-owned enterprises, and how these relationships were mediated by employees' productivity goal orientation. We predicted the effects of ownership reform and collectivism on rewards-allocation preferences based on the model of allocation goal priority and the conceptual distinctions of vertical and horizontal collectivism. With data from four pairs of public state-owned enterprises (i.e., listed on the stock market) versus pure state-owned enterprises, we found the following results. First, employees of enterprises that had experienced a greater degree of ownership reform expressed stronger preferences for differential allocation rules (e.g., job position and performance) but weaker preferences for equalitarian allocation rules (e.g., group and individual equality). Second, vertical collectivism was positively related to preferences for differential allocation rules, but horizontal collectivism was positively related to preferences for equalitarian allocation rules. Third, the effects of both ownership reform and vertical collectivism on differential allocation preferences were mediated by productivity goal orientation. Research and practical implications for ownership reform and vertical-horizontal collectivism are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei He & Chao C. Chen & Lihua Zhang, 2004. "Rewards-Allocation Preferences of Chinese Employees in the New Millennium: The Effects of Ownership Reform, Collectivism, and Goal Priority," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 221-231, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:221-231
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1030.0049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0049
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.1030.0049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Hassard & Jackie Sheehan & Jonathan Morris, 1999. "Enterprise Reform in Post-Deng China," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 54-83, September.
    2. Xiaonian Xu & Yan Wang, 1997. "Ownership structure, corporate governance, and corporate performance : the case of Chinese stock companies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1794, The World Bank.
    3. John M. Abowd, 1990. "Does Performance-Based Managerial Compensation Affect Corporate Performance?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 43(3), pages 52, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin, Yige & Dong, Nanyan & Tian, Gaoliang & Zhang, Junrui, 2023. "Wisdom of the masses: Employee education and corporate risk taking," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Shao-Long Li & Wei He & Kai Yam & Li-Rong Long, 2015. "When and why empowering leadership increases followers’ taking charge: A multilevel examination in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 645-670, September.
    3. Xu Huang & Kan Shi & Zhijie Zhang & Yat Cheung, 2006. "The impact of participative leadership behavior on psychological empowerment and organizational commitment in Chinese state-owned enterprises: the moderating role of organizational tenure," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 345-367, September.
    4. Bradley Koch & Pamela Koch, 2007. "Collectivism, individualism, and outgroup cooperation in a segmented China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 207-225, June.
    5. Dan V. Caprar & Sunghoon Kim & Benjamin W. Walker & Paula Caligiuri, 2022. "Beyond “Doing as the Romans Do”: A review of research on countercultural business practices," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(7), pages 1449-1483, September.
    6. Chao Chen & Xiao-Ping Chen, 2009. "Negative externalities of close guanxi within organizations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 37-53, March.
    7. Xinhui Jiang & Chao Chen & Kan Shi, 2013. "Favor in exchange for trust? The role of subordinates’ attribution of supervisory favors," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 513-536, June.
    8. Firth, Michael & Leung, Tak Yan & Rui, Oliver M. & Na, Chaohong, 2015. "Relative pay and its effects on firm efficiency in a transitional economy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 59-77.
    9. Qi Wei & Chris Rowley, 2008. "Changing patterns of rewards in Asia: a literature review," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 489-506, September.
    10. Gaffney, Nolan & Cooper, Danielle & Kedia, Ben & Clampit, Jack, 2014. "Institutional transitions, global mindset, and EMNE internationalization," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 383-391.
    11. Anne S. Tsui & Claudia Bird Schoonhoven & Marshall W. Meyer & Chung-Ming Lau & George T. Milkovich, 2004. "Organization and Management in the Midst of Societal Transformation: The People's Republic of China," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 133-144, April.
    12. Shirley Daniel & Dongyoung Lee & Wolf Reitsperger, 2014. "Raising quality consciousness among Chinese manufacturing personnel: Testing the effectiveness of performance management tools," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 549-573, June.
    13. Kwok Leung & Xiaowan Lin & Lin Lu, 2014. "Compensation Disparity between Locals and Expatriates in China: A Multilevel Analysis of the Influence of Norms," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 107-128, February.
    14. Afia Saleem & Usman Ghani, 2013. "Application of Weisbord's Organizational Diagnosis Model: A Case of Pakistan Banking Industry," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, April.
    15. Gao, Zhonghua & Zhao, Chen & Liu, Yonghong, 2023. "Fostering a salesperson’s team identification: An investigation into the effects of leader-follower emotional intelligence congruence from a person–environment fit perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Diego Quer & Enrique Claver & Laura Rienda, 2007. "Business and management in China: A review of empirical research in leading international journals," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 359-384, September.
    17. Michael W. Morris & Joel Podolny & Bilian Ni Sullivan, 2008. "Culture and Coworker Relations: Interpersonal Patterns in American, Chinese, German, and Spanish Divisions of a Global Retail Bank," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 517-532, August.
    18. Chao C. Chen & Joseph P. Gaspar & Ray Friedman & William Newburry & Michael C. Nippa & Katherine Xin & Ronaldo Parente, 2017. "Paradoxical Relationships Between Cultural Norms of Particularism and Attitudes Toward Relational Favoritism: A Cultural Reflectivity Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 63-79, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asch, Beth J & Warner, John T, 2001. "A Theory of Compensation and Personnel Policy in Hierarchical Organizations with Application to the United States Military," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(3), pages 523-562, July.
    2. Modell, Sven & Yang, ChunLei, 2018. "Financialisation as a strategic action field: An historically informed field study of governance reforms in Chinese state-owned enterprises," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-59.
    3. Sjoo, Boo & Zhang, Jianhua, 2000. "Market segmentation and information diffusion in China's stock markets," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(3-4), pages 421-438, December.
    4. Belzil, Christian & Bognanno, Michael & Poinas, François, 2012. "Promotion Determinants in Corporate Hierarchies: An Examination of Fast Tracks and Functional Area," TSE Working Papers 12-348, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    5. Patrick Kampkoetter, 2012. "Determinants of Compensation in the Financial Services Industry," Cologne Graduate School Working Paper Series 03-12, Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences.
    6. Qi Quan & N. Huyghebaert, 2004. "Privatization. Issues at Stake in the Case of China," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(4), pages 647-687.
    7. Natalie Chun & Soohyung Lee, 2015. "Bonus compensation and productivity: evidence from Indian manufacturing plant-level data," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 47-58, February.
    8. Ameen Alharbi & Aminu Mamman, 2015. "Why Human Resource Management Innovations have many Versions not in Theory but in Practice," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(11), pages 214-229, November.
    9. Benno Torgler & Sascha L. Schmidt & Bruno S. Frey, 2006. "The Power of Positional Concerns: A Panel Analysis," CREMA Working Paper Series 2006-19, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    10. Wali Ullah, 2017. "Evolving corporate governance and firms performance: evidence from Japanese firms," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-33, February.
    11. Tony Caporale & Trevor Collier, 2015. "To Three or Not to Three?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-8, March.
    12. Lee, Hyoungjin & Park, Junmin & Chung, Chris Changwha, 2022. "CEO compensation, governance structure, and foreign direct investment in conflict-prone countries," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(6).
    13. Stuart L. Gillan & Laura T. Starks, 2002. "Institutional Investors, Corporate Ownership, and Corporate Governance: Global Perspectives," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2002-09, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Joshua M. Congdon-Hohman & Jonathan A. Lanning, 2018. "Beyond Moneyball," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 19(7), pages 1046-1061, October.
    15. Phyllis A. Siegel & Donald C. Hambrick, 2005. "Pay Disparities Within Top Management Groups: Evidence of Harmful Effects on Performance of High-Technology Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 259-274, June.
    16. John Fernald & John H. Rogers, 2002. "Puzzles In The Chinese Stock Market," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(3), pages 416-432, August.
    17. Yasheng Huang, 2001. "Why More is Actually Less: New Interpretations of China's Labor-Intensive FDI," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 375, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    18. Apu Manna & Tarak Nath Sahu & Arindam Gupta, 2016. "Impact of Ownership Structure and Board Composition on Corporate Performance in Indian Companies," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 9(1), pages 44-66, June.
    19. Tuan Nguyen, 2017. "Do Female Directors Add Value?," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 13(3), pages 169-177, JUNE.
    20. Brunello, Giorgio & Graziano, Clara & Parigi, Bruno, 2001. "Executive compensation and firm performance in Italy," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 133-161, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:221-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.