IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hur/ijarbs/v5y2015i11p214-229.html

Why Human Resource Management Innovations have many Versions not in Theory but in Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Ameen Alharbi
  • Aminu Mamman

Abstract

In the last few decades, most organizations have embraced the notion of Change or Perish. As a result, Management Innovations (MI) are adopted the moment they are produced by fashion setters among others. However, these innovations are not usually adopted and implemented in full. The innovations are usually modified consciously and unconsciously. This has attracted a lot of criticism from researchers and experts. Although this phenomenon has been widely acknowledged by researchers and practitioners, surprisingly very little research has addressed the issue of why and how MI are modified. Given the importance of modification of MI to organizations who undertake it and to those organizations that wish to emulate them, understanding of why and how MI are modified is very important to the understanding of why MI work or do not work.. Therefore, the central objective of this paper is to explain why and how MI are modified. Using a theoretical framework, the paper argues that why and how MI are modified are largely influenced by the reason for the adoption of the innovation in the first place. The practical and research implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ameen Alharbi & Aminu Mamman, 2015. "Why Human Resource Management Innovations have many Versions not in Theory but in Practice," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(11), pages 214-229, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:5:y:2015:i:11:p:214-229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Why_Human_Resource_Management_Innovations_have_many_Versions_not_in_Theory_But_in_Practice2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Why_Human_Resource_Management_Innovations_have_many_Versions_not_in_Theory_But_in_Practice2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María Eugenia Arias & Mauro Guillén, 1998. "The Transfer of Organizational Techniques Across Borders: Combining Neo-Institutional and Comparative Perspectives," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: José Luis Alvarez (ed.), The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge, chapter 4, pages 110-137, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. John M. Abowd, 1990. "Does Performance-Based Managerial Compensation Affect Corporate Performance?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 43(3), pages 52, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asch, Beth J & Warner, John T, 2001. "A Theory of Compensation and Personnel Policy in Hierarchical Organizations with Application to the United States Military," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(3), pages 523-562, July.
    2. Belzil, Christian & Bognanno, Michael & Poinas, François, 2012. "Promotion Determinants in Corporate Hierarchies: An Examination of Fast Tracks and Functional Area," TSE Working Papers 12-348, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    3. repec:cgr:cgsser:03-12 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Natalie Chun & Soohyung Lee, 2015. "Bonus compensation and productivity: evidence from Indian manufacturing plant-level data," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 47-58, February.
    5. Tony Caporale & Trevor Collier, 2015. "To Three or Not to Three?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-8, March.
    6. Phyllis A. Siegel & Donald C. Hambrick, 2005. "Pay Disparities Within Top Management Groups: Evidence of Harmful Effects on Performance of High-Technology Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 259-274, June.
    7. Benno Torgler & Sascha L. Schmidt & Bruno S. Frey, 2006. "The Power of Positional Concerns: A Panel Analysis," CREMA Working Paper Series 2006-19, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    8. Brunello, Giorgio & Graziano, Clara & Parigi, Bruno, 2001. "Executive compensation and firm performance in Italy," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 133-161, January.
    9. Nadide BANU OLCAY GÜNER, 2023. "Incentivizing CEOs via pay and forced turnover: Do tenure and managerial ability matter?," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(1(634), S), pages 37-66, Spring.
    10. Robert Gibbons, 1996. "Incentives and Careers in Organizations," NBER Working Papers 5705, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Abdelaziz Elmarzougui, 2006. "Evolution et sensibilité des stock-options : cas du marché français," Working Papers hal-04138526, HAL.
    12. Mahmoud Nourayi & Sudha Krishnan, 2006. "The impact of incentives on CEO compensation and firm performance," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 53(3), pages 402-420, September.
    13. Yu, Shuangli & Shen, Yuxin & Zhang, Fan & Shen, Yongjian & Xu, Zefeng, 2022. "Air pollution and executive incentive: Evidence from pay-performance sensitivity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Cornell, Bradford, 2002. "Compensation and Recruiting: Private Universities versus Private Corporations," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt6z76z49q, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    15. Fateh Saci & Boualem Aliouat, 2013. "La création de valeur des alliances stratégiques et des fusions-acquisitions : justification comparative par le modèle de mesure de la valeur financière "cas des sociétés du SBF 250"," Post-Print halshs-00877514, HAL.
    16. Paul Gregg & Sarah Jewell & Ian Tonks, 2005. "Executive Pay and Performance in the UK 1994-2002," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 05/122, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    17. Benno Torgler & Sascha L. Schmidt & Bruno S. Frey, 2006. "Relative Income Position And Performance: An Empirical Panel Analysis," IEW - Working Papers 268, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    18. Lazear, Edward P, 1997. "Incentives in Basic Research," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 15(1), pages 167-197, January.
    19. Zhou, Xianming, 1999. "Executive compensation and managerial incentives: A comparison between Canada and the United States1," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 277-301, September.
    20. Zur Shapira & Gary Dushnitsky, 2011. "Entrepreneurial Finance Meets Organizational Reality: Comparing Investment Practices And Performance Of Corporate And Independent Venture Capitalists," Discussion Paper Series dp589, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    21. John M. Abowd & David S. Kaplan, 1999. "Executive Compensation: Six Questions That Need Answering," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 145-168, Fall.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:5:y:2015:i:11:p:214-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.