IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3539-d1635085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to Sustainable Building Project Performance in Developing Countries: A Case of Ghana and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Al-Otaibi

    (Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shaqra University, Al-Dawadmi 11911, Saudi Arabia)

  • Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Dr. Hilla Limann Technical University, Wa P.O. Box 553, Ghana)

  • Aasem Alabdullatief

    (Department of Architecture and Building Sciences, College of Architecture and Planning, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Majd Albaiz

    (Department of Architecture and Building Sciences, College of Architecture and Planning, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mona Salah

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Horus University, New Damietta 7952567, Egypt)

Abstract

The global building and construction industry faces increasing challenges related to efficiency, performance, and sustainability, which significantly impact project success, particularly in developing economies. The timely and successful completion of building and construction projects is crucial for economic development; however, various barriers hinder effective project execution. This study identifies and empirically analyzes the critical barriers affecting building and construction project performance in two developing countries with distinct economic profiles, Ghana and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). A comprehensive literature review and expert interviews identified fourteen key barriers to project performance, ensuring clarity and technical relevance. Using an empirical questionnaire survey targeting experienced professionals, including contractors, clients, and consultants, the study employed the Relative Importance Index ( RII ) and Spearman’s correlation analysis to rank and examine the interrelationships between these barriers. The findings reveal that poor communication ( RII = 0.831, ranked 1st), project cost and schedule constraints ( RII = 0.806, ranked 2nd), and inadequate monitoring and evaluation ( RII = 0.786, ranked 3rd) are the most significant barriers to project success in both contexts. These challenges align with global sustainability concerns, particularly Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), which emphasize resilient infrastructure and sustainable urban development. The study highlights the crucial role of decision makers, regulatory frameworks, and financial planning in overcoming these barriers and enhancing project outcomes. By addressing these constraints, the study provides actionable insights for policymakers, project managers, and industry stakeholders to improve project execution efficiency and foster sustainable building and construction practices. Future research should explore adaptive mitigation strategies and technological innovations that enhance project delivery efficiency in developing economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Al-Otaibi & Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan & Aasem Alabdullatief & Majd Albaiz & Mona Salah, 2025. "Barriers to Sustainable Building Project Performance in Developing Countries: A Case of Ghana and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3539-:d:1635085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3539/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3539/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas B. Rajkovich & Yasmein Okour, 2019. "Climate Change Resilience Strategies for the Building Sector: Examining Existing Domains of Resilience Utilized by Design Professionals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    2. repec:aoj:areaes:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:18-22:id:4339 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Rawaa HIJAZI, 2021. "Factors Hindering Quality Performance in Construction Projects: An Empirical Study," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 21(1), pages 47-57, June.
    4. Yingmiao Qian & Xian-An Yu & Malin Song & Zhiyang Shen, 2023. "Complexity analysis and control of game behavior of subjects in green building materials supply chain considering technology subsidies," Post-Print hal-03974946, HAL.
    5. Ali Al-Otaibi & Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan & Mahmoud M. Abdel daiem & Noha Said & John Obas Ebohon & Aasem Alabdullatief & Essa Al-Enazi & Greg Watts, 2022. "Identifying the Barriers to Sustainable Management of Construction and Demolition Waste in Developed and Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Lara Gonzalez-Porras & Anna Heikkinen & Johanna Kujala, 2021. "Understanding stakeholder influence: lessons from a controversial megaproject," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(2/3), pages 191-213.
    7. Bent Flyvbjerg & Mette K. Skamris holm & Søren L. Buhl, 2003. "How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 71-88, January.
    8. Hamed Taherdoost, 2021. "A Review on Risk Management in Information Systems: Risk Policy, Control and Fraud Detection," Post-Print hal-03741848, HAL.
    9. Chevrier, Sylvie, 2003. "Cross-cultural management in multinational project groups," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 141-149, May.
    10. Begum, Rawshan Ara & Siwar, Chamhuri & Pereira, Joy Jacqueline & Jaafar, Abdul Hamid, 2006. "A benefit–cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: The case of Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 86-98.
    11. Shahid Hussain & Wang Xuetong & Talib Hussain, 2020. "Impact of Skilled and Unskilled Labor on Project Performance Using Structural Equation Modeling Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, March.
    12. Mohammed Rady & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Mohammed Magdy Hamed & Ahmed Osama Daoud, 2023. "Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling of Constraint Factors Affecting Project Performance in the Egyptian Building Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Moazami, Amin & Nik, Vahid M. & Carlucci, Salvatore & Geving, Stig, 2019. "Impacts of future weather data typology on building energy performance – Investigating long-term patterns of climate change and extreme weather conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 696-720.
    14. Khozema Ahmed Ali & Mardiana Idayu Ahmad & Yusri Yusup, 2020. "Issues, Impacts, and Mitigations of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-11, September.
    15. Jaroslav Vrchota & Petr Řehoř & Monika Maříková & Martin Pech, 2020. "Critical Success Factors of the Project Management in Relation to Industry 4.0 for Sustainability of Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lilliana Abarca-Guerrero & Susi Lobo-Ugalde & Nicole Méndez-Carpio & Rosibel Rodríguez-Leandro & Victoria Rudin-Vega, 2022. "Zero Waste Systems: Barriers and Measures to Recycling of Construction and Demolition Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Noushin Islam & Malindu Sandanayake & Shobha Muthukumaran & Dimuth Navaratna, 2024. "Review on Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management—Challenges and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Chantal C. Cantarelli & Bert van Wee & Eric J. E. Molin & Bent Flyvbjerg, 2013. "Different Cost Performance: Different Determinants? The Case of Cost Overruns in Dutch Transportation Infrastructure Projects," Papers 1307.2179, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2015.
    4. Javed, Hasnain & Du, Jianguo & Iqbal, Shuja & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Basheer, Muhammad Farhan, 2024. "The impact of mineral resource abundance on environmental degradation in ten mineral- rich countries: Do the green innovation and financial technology matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. José Martins & Rui Cunha Marques & Carlos Oliveira Cruz & Álvaro Fonseca, 2017. "Flexibility in planning and development of a container terminal: an application of an American-style call option," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(7), pages 828-840, October.
    6. Mauro Bambi & Cristina Girolami & Salvatore Federico & Fausto Gozzi, 2017. "Generically distributed investments on flexible projects and endogenous growth," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 63(2), pages 521-558, February.
    7. Cantarelli, C.C. & Flyvbjerg, B. & Buhl, S.L., 2012. "Geographical variation in project cost performance: the Netherlands versus worldwide," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 324-331.
    8. Bell, N.O. & Bilbao, J.I. & Kay, M. & Sproul, A.B., 2022. "Future climate scenarios and their impact on heating, ventilation and air-conditioning system design and performance for commercial buildings for 2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Holz-Rau, Christian & Scheiner, Joachim, 2011. "Safety and travel time in cost-benefit analysis: A sensitivity analysis for North Rhine-Westphalia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 336-346, March.
    10. Erica Bosio & Simeon Djankov & Edward Glaeser & Andrei Shleifer, 2022. "Public Procurement in Law and Practice," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(4), pages 1091-1117, April.
    11. Love, Peter E.D. & Ika, Lavagnon A. & Ahiaga-Dagbui, Dominic D., 2019. "On de-bunking ‘fake news’ in a post truth era: Why does the Planning Fallacy explanation for cost overruns fall short?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 397-408.
    12. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier, 2018. "Report for the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry," Papers 1805.12106, arXiv.org.
    13. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Carla Curado & Jesús Galende, 2021. "Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis on the Adoption of Environmental Practices: Exploring Technological- and Human-Resource-Based Contributions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Aliyeva, Xeniya & Memon, Shazim Ali & Nazir, Kashif & Kim, Jong, 2024. "Energy consumption forecasting in PCM-integration buildings considering building and environmental parameters for future climate scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    15. Prakash, Nishith & Rockmore, Marc & Uppal, Yogesh, 2019. "Do criminally accused politicians affect economic outcomes? Evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    16. Chantal C. Cantarelli & Bent Flybjerg & Eric J. E. Molin & Bert van Wee, 2013. "Cost overruns in Large-Scale Transportation Infrastructure Projects: Explanations and Their Theoretical Embeddedness," Papers 1307.2176, arXiv.org.
    17. Ricardo Santa & Mario Ferrer & Thomas Tegethoff & Annibal Scavarda, 2022. "An investigation of the impact of human capital and supply chain competitive drivers on firm performance in a developing country," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Shi Yin & Yudan Zhao, 2024. "An agent-based evolutionary system model of the transformation from building material industry (BMI) to green intelligent BMI under supply chain management," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. D'Amico, A. & Ciulla, G. & Panno, D. & Ferrari, S., 2019. "Building energy demand assessment through heating degree days: The importance of a climatic dataset," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1285-1306.
    20. Olav Torp & Ole Jonny Klakegg, 2016. "Challenges in Cost Estimation under Uncertainty—A Case Study of the Decommissioning of Barsebäck Nuclear Power Plant," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3539-:d:1635085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.