IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i13p1553-d587042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis on the Adoption of Environmental Practices: Exploring Technological- and Human-Resource-Based Contributions

Author

Listed:
  • Lucía Muñoz-Pascual

    (Departamento de Administración y Economía de la Empresa, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Instituto Multidisciplinar de Empresa (IME), Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, Universidad de Salamanca, Edificio FES, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)

  • Carla Curado

    (Advance/CSG ISEG, University of Lisbon, Rua do Quelhas, 6, 1200-781 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Jesús Galende

    (Departamento de Administración y Economía de la Empresa, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Instituto Multidisciplinar de Empresa (IME), Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, Universidad de Salamanca, Edificio FES, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)

Abstract

Our main objective was to analyze which paths can lead to the adoption of environmental practices (PRAC) in firms, for which we developed three original alternative research models. Model 1 involves five sources for the adoption of environmental practices: human resource costs, organizational learning capability, firm size, manager educational level and manager experience. Model 2 adopts five sources for PRAC: human resource costs, information technology support, firm size, manager educational level and manager experience. Finally, Model 3 adopts six sources for PRAC: human resource costs, organizational learning capability, information technology support, firm size, manager educational level and manager experience. Therefore, Model 1 uses the organizational learning capability for PRAC, Model 2 uses the information technology support for PRAC and Model 3 uses both organizational learning capability and information technology support for PRAC. We used a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis on 349 small- and medium-sized Portuguese firms in twelve industrial sectors. The results show that organizational learning capability (OLC) and information technology support (ITS) are important sources for the development of PRAC. In this line, the three research models show that there are different pathways that lead to PRAC. These research models also show pathways that lead to the absence of PRAC. Therefore, the qualitative findings show the relevancy of OLC and ITS to PRAC. In addition, our findings indicate that, by focusing on variables such as OLC, a firm can find more paths that lead to PRAC. Additionally, with the combination of OLC and ITS, it must be taken into account that only developing ITS without OLC is riskier when obtaining PRAC.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Carla Curado & Jesús Galende, 2021. "Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis on the Adoption of Environmental Practices: Exploring Technological- and Human-Resource-Based Contributions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:13:p:1553-:d:587042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/13/1553/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/13/1553/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeremy Hall & Marcus Wagner, 2012. "Integrating Sustainability into Firms' Processes: Performance Effects and the Moderating Role of Business Models and Innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 183-196, March.
    2. Cayetano Medina-Molina & Manuel Rey-Moreno & J. Augusto Felício & Inmaculada Romano Paguillo, 2019. "Participation in crowdfunding among users of collaborative platforms: the role of innovativeness and social capital," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 529-543, June.
    3. Marcus Wagner, 2009. "Innovation and competitive advantages from the integration of strategic aspects with social and environmental management in European firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 291-306, July.
    4. Ricardo Chiva & Joaquin Alegre & Rafael Lapiedra, 2007. "Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(1), pages 224 - 242, April.
    5. Kaya, Bahar & Abubakar, A. Mohammed & Behravesh, Elaheh & Yildiz, Harun & Mert, Ibrahim Sani, 2020. "Antecedents of innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fuzzy sets (fsQCA)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 278-289.
    6. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
    7. Ainhoa Saitua-Iribar & Javier Corral-Lage & Noemi Peña-Miguel, 2020. "Improving Knowledge about the Sustainable Development Goals through a Collaborative Learning Methodology and Serious Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-11, July.
    8. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Gratton, Lynda & Ghoshal, Sumantra, 2003. "Managing Personal Human Capital:: New Ethos for the 'Volunteer' Employee," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-10, February.
    10. Ricardo Chiva & Joaquin Alegre & Rafael Lapiedra, 2007. "Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3/4), pages 224-242, June.
    11. Leischnig, Alexander & Henneberg, Stephan C. & Thornton, Sabrina C., 2016. "Net versus combinatory effects of firm and industry antecedents of sales growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3576-3583.
    12. Oyemomi, Oluwafemi & Liu, Shaofeng & Neaga, Irina & Alkhuraiji, Ali, 2016. "How knowledge sharing and business process contribute to organizational performance: Using the fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5222-5227.
    13. Woodside, Arch G. & Hsu, Shih-Yun & Marshall, Roger, 2011. "General theory of cultures' consequences on international tourism behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(8), pages 785-799, August.
    14. Vila, Luis E. & Pérez, Pedro J. & Coll-Serrano, Vicente, 2014. "Innovation at the workplace: Do professional competencies matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 752-757.
    15. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Carla Curado & Jesús Galende, 2019. "The Triple Bottom Line on Sustainable Product Innovation Performance in SMEs: A Mixed Methods Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Osabutey, Ellis L.C. & Jin, Zhongqi, 2016. "Factors influencing technology and knowledge transfer: Configurational recipes for Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5390-5395.
    17. Sascha Kraus & Norat Roig-Tierno & Ricarda B. Bouncken, 2019. "Digital innovation and venturing: an introduction into the digitalization of entrepreneurship," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 519-528, June.
    18. Kuemmerle, Walter, 1998. "Optimal scale for research and development in foreign environments--an investigation into size and performance of research and development laboratories abroad," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 111-126, June.
    19. Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu & Simona-Andreea Apostu & Andreea Paul & Ionut Casuneanu, 2020. "Work Flexibility, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance among Romanian Employees—Implications for Sustainable Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-53, July.
    20. Norat Roig‐Tierno & Sascha Kraus & Sonia Cruz, 2018. "The relation between coopetition and innovation/entrepreneurship," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 379-383, March.
    21. Jaroslav Vrchota & Petr Řehoř & Monika Maříková & Martin Pech, 2020. "Critical Success Factors of the Project Management in Relation to Industry 4.0 for Sustainability of Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    22. Curado, Carla & Muñoz-Pascual, Lucía & Galende, Jesús, 2018. "Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 206-215.
    23. Molero, Jose & Buesa, Mikel, 1996. "Patterns of technological change among Spanish innovative firms: the case of the Madrid region," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 647-663, June.
    24. Ante Glavas & Jenny Mish, 2015. "Resources and Capabilities of Triple Bottom Line Firms: Going Over Old or Breaking New Ground?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 623-642, March.
    25. Sascha Kraus & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano & Miriam Schüssler, 2018. "Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 15-33, March.
    26. Celma, Dolors & Martinez-Garcia, Esther & Raya, Josep M., 2018. "Socially Responsible Hr Practices And Their Effects On Employees’ Wellbeing: Empirical Evidence From Catalonia, Spain," European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE), Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (AEDEM), vol. 24(2), pages 82-89.
    27. Geneviève Bassellier & Izak Benbasat & Blaize Horner Reich, 2003. "The Influence of Business Managers' IT Competence on Championing IT," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 317-336, December.
    28. Kumar, Nagesh & Saqib, Mohammed, 1996. "Firm size, opportunities for adaptation and in-house R & D activity in developing countries: the case of Indian manufacturing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 713-722, August.
    29. Argote, Linda & Ingram, Paul & Levine, John M. & Moreland, Richard L., 2000. "Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 1-8, May.
    30. Mohamed, S.T, 2001. "The impact of ISO 14000 on developing world businesses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 579-584.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jorge de Andres-Sanchez & Ala Ali Almahameed & Mario Arias-Oliva & Jorge Pelegrin-Borondo, 2022. "Correlational and Configurational Analysis of Factors Influencing Potential Patients’ Attitudes toward Surgical Robots: A Study in the Jordan University Community," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Carla Curado & Jesús Galende, 2021. "How does the use of information technologies affect the adoption of environmental practices in SMEs? A mixed-methods approach," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 75-102, January.
    2. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Carla Curado & Jesús Galende, 2019. "The Triple Bottom Line on Sustainable Product Innovation Performance in SMEs: A Mixed Methods Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Curado, Carla & Muñoz-Pascual, Lucía & Galende, Jesús, 2018. "Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 206-215.
    4. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Jesús Galende, 2020. "Ambidextrous Knowledge and Learning Capability: The Magic Potion for Employee Creativity and Sustainable Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-27, May.
    5. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Jesús Galende & Carla Curado, 2019. "Human Resource Management Contributions to Knowledge Sharing for a Sustainability-Oriented Performance: A Mixed Methods Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Fernandes Crespo, Nuno & Curado, Carla & Oliveira, Mírian & Muñoz-Pascual, Lucía, 2021. "Entrepreneurial capital leveraging innovation in micro firms: A mixed-methods perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 333-342.
    7. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Jesús Galende, 2020. "Ambidextrous Relationships and Social Capability as Employee Well-Being: The Secret Sauce for Research and Development and Sustainable Innovation Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Jesús Galende & Carla Curado, 2021. "Contributions to Sustainability in SMEs: Human Resources, Sustainable Product Innovation Performance and the Mediating Role of Employee Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Pascucci, Stefano & Royer, Annie & Bijman, Jos, 2012. "To Make or to Buy: Is this the Question?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Mario Arias-Oliva & Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez & Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo, 2021. "Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Factors Influencing the Use of Cryptocurrencies in Spanish Households," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Tomasz Witold Trojanowski & Pawel Tadeusz Kazibudzki, 2021. "Prospects and Constraints of Sustainable Marketing Mix Development for Poland’s High-Energy Consumer Goods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Coppola, Adele & Pascucci, Stefano, 2007. "The Role of Innovations in the Competitive Strategies of Italian Agri-Food Enterprises," 2007 1st Forum, February 15-17, 2007, Innsbruck, Austria 6584, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    13. Tomasz Trojanowski, 2021. "Sustainable Environmental Management in an Energy Company: A Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 89-101.
    14. Pawel Tadeusz Kazibudzki & Tomasz Witold Trojanowski, 2020. "Examination of marketing mix performance in relation to sustainable development of the Poland’s confectionery industry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Prokop, Viktor & Hajek, Petr & Stejskal, Jan, 2021. "Configuration Paths to Efficient National Innovation Ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Esteban Lafuente & Yancy Vaillant & Juan Carlos Leiva, 2018. "Sustainable and Traditional Product Innovation without Scale and Experience, but Only for KIBS!," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Bacon, Emily & Williams, Michael D. & Davies, Gareth, 2020. "Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 307-316.
    18. Pascucci, Stefano & Royer, Annie & Bijman, Jos, 2011. "Should I Make or Should I Buy? Innovation Strategies and Governance Structures in the Italian Food Sector," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(2), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Manuel Fernández-Esquinas & María Isabel Sánchez-Rodríguez & José Antonio Pedraza-Rodríguez & Rocío Muñoz-Benito, 2021. "The use of QCA in science, technology and innovation studies: a review of the literature and an empirical application to knowledge transfer," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6349-6382, August.
    20. Galende, Jesus & de la Fuente, Juan Manuel, 2003. "Internal factors determining a firm's innovative behaviour," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 715-736, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:13:p:1553-:d:587042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.