IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p3036-d1370639.html

How to Improve an Enterprise’s Innovation Capability from the Perspective of High- and Low-Level Enterprises Using Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Bai

    (School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
    School of Tourism and Sports Health Management, Hezhou University, Hezhou 542899, China)

  • Shengxu Xiong

    (School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China)

  • Zhe Zhou

    (School of Public Health & Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325015, China)

  • Xin Liu

    (School of Management, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430024, China)

Abstract

An enterprise’s capability is based on the quantity and collocation pattern of the heterogeneous resources it possesses. Innovation resources are the source of enterprise innovation capability. However, there is still a “black box” problem of the impact of the intensity of government support on enterprise innovation. Therefore, it is necessary to study high- or low-level enterprise innovation capability by combining the internal and external factors of the enterprise—the background characteristics of R&D personnel and the degree of government support. Based on the configuration perspective, this study uses the qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method to conduct a comparative analysis of the innovation capabilities of enterprises in five time windows over six years with the longitudinal database of China’s industrial enterprises whose operating income exceeds RMB 20 million from 2010 to 2015. This paper summarizes two ways of realizing high-level enterprise innovation capability: female and highly educated R&D personnel type, and highly educated R&D personnel and high government investment type. The enterprise innovation capability is affected simultaneously by multiple conditional variables, and the impact of each conditional variable on enterprise innovation capability has a trend. Further, it analyzes the impact of every antecedent variable comparing high- to low-level enterprise innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Bai & Shengxu Xiong & Zhe Zhou & Xin Liu, 2024. "How to Improve an Enterprise’s Innovation Capability from the Perspective of High- and Low-Level Enterprises Using Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:3036-:d:1370639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/3036/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/3036/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman & Mahmood Doroodian & Yusniza Kamarulzaman & Norhamidi Muhamad, 2015. "Designing and Validating a Model for Measuring Sustainability of Overall Innovation Capability of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Hu, Albert Guangzhou & Jefferson, Gary H., 2004. "Returns to research and development in Chinese industry: Evidence from state-owned enterprises in Beijing," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 86-107, January.
    3. Srinivas Kolluru & Pundarik Mukhopadhaya, 2017. "Empirical Studies on Innovation Performance in the Manufacturing and Service Sectors Since 1995: A Systematic Review," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 36(2), pages 223-248, June.
    4. Baumann, Julian & Kritikos, Alexander S., 2016. "The link between R&D, innovation and productivity: Are micro firms different?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1263-1274.
    5. Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Tian, Xuan & Xu, Yan, 2014. "Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 116-135.
    6. Pappas, Ilias O. & Woodside, Arch G., 2021. "Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Becker, Annette & Hottenrott, Hanna & Mukherjee, Anwesha, 2022. "Division of labor in R&D? Firm size and specialization in corporate research," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1-23.
    8. Shimin Chen & Xu Ni & Jamie Y. Tong, 2016. "Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Risk Management: A Case of R&D Investment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 599-621, July.
    9. Hu, Yuhan & Liu, Hao & Zhao, Jian & Tu, Liangping, 2019. "Dynamic analysis of dissemination model of innovation ability of enterprise R&D personnel," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 531(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Panta Maria & Xygkogianni Maria, 2024. "Innovation in European SMEs: Exploring the Influence of Investments, Funding, Knowledge, and Intellectual Assets," Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 1-1.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuanyuan Guo & Ping Gao & Daojin Cheng, 2022. "The Effects Of R&D And Its Different Types On Firm Productivity: Evidence From China," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(08), pages 1-30, October.
    2. Chen, Zhibin & Xu, Yibin & Tian, Zongtao & Meng, Xu, 2022. "The Impact of Social Insurance Law on Corporate Innovation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Dong, Xiao & Yu, Mingzhe, 2023. "Does FinTech development facilitate firms' innovation? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Nnaemeka Vincent Emodi & Girish Panchakshara Murthy & Chinenye Comfort Emodi & Adaeze Saratu Augusta Emodi, 2017. "Factors Influencing Innovation and Industrial Performance in Chinese Manufacturing Industry," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1-32, December.
    5. Du, Qunyang & Li, Zhongyuan & Du, Min & Yang, Tianle, 2024. "Government venture capital and innovation performance in alternative energy production: The moderating role of environmental regulation and capital market activity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    6. Liu, Xiaojing & Huang, Ningren & Su, Wunhong & Zhou, Haiyan, 2024. "Green innovation and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Yuan, Li & Rao, Siqi & Yang, Shenggang & Dai, Pengyi, 2023. "Does equity market openness increase productivity? the dual effects of Shanghai-Hong Kong stock Connect program in China," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Jamaani, Fouad, 2025. "Can female directors affect IPO withdrawal risk?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 361-383.
    9. Osakwe, Christian Nedu & Ogunmokun, Oluwatobi A. & Elgammal, Islam & Kwarteng, Michael Adu, 2025. "Individuals' attitudes and their adoption intentions of central bank digital currency: Combining theories and analytics for deeper insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    10. Long Xue & Qianyu Zhang & Xuemang Zhang & Chengyu Li, 2022. "Can Digital Transformation Promote Green Technology Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Chen, Shiu-Sheng, 2017. "Exchange rate undervaluation and R&D activity," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 148-160.
    12. Jin, Laiqun & Dai, Jiaying & Jiang, Weijie & Cao, Kairui, 2023. "Digital finance and misallocation of resources among firms: Evidence from China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Qureshi, Irfan & Park, Donghyun & Crespi, Gustavo Atilio & Benavente, Jose Miguel, 2021. "Trends and determinants of innovation in Asia and the Pacific vs. Latin America and the Caribbean," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1287-1309.
    14. Prentice, Catherine & Tianchai, Maneerat & Zeidan, Susan & Wang, Xuequn, 2025. "An asymmetrical pilot resilience model – fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 171-179.
    15. Ioannis Giotopoulos & Alexander S. Kritikos & Aggelos Tsakanikas, 2023. "A lasting crisis affects R&D decisions of smaller firms: the Greek experience," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1161-1175, August.
    16. Meina Zhou & Yiqun Sun & Hao Ji, 2025. "The Impact of Financial Inclusion on Sustainable Development in China: A Panel fsQCA Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, December.
    17. Torsten Heinrich & Jangho Yang & Shuanping Dai, 2020. "Growth, development, and structural change at the firm-level: The example of the PR China," Papers 2012.14503, arXiv.org.
    18. Li, Xukai & Wang, Tengkun, 2026. "Digital transformation, financial support, and industry chain resilience," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    19. de Haas, Ralph & Popov, A., 2018. "Financial Development and Industrial Pollution," Other publications TiSEM a0a4fb82-734a-442a-9ea1-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Hou, Qingsong & Hu, May & Yuan, Yuan, 2017. "Corporate innovation and political connections in Chinese listed firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 46(PA), pages 158-176.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:3036-:d:1370639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.