IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10423-d1185187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Level and Influencing Factors of Digital Village Development in China: Insights and Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Xizi Cao

    (Department of Statistics, School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Mingyi Yan

    (Department of Statistics, School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Jun Wen

    (Department of Industrial Economics, School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

Abstract

Digital rural construction is an important strategy for rural revitalization. In order to improve the precision of digital rural measurement, a set of evaluation indicators for digital rural construction was devised in this study. The study uses the entropy method, kernel density estimation and system clustering to quantify the level of China’s digital rural construction, as well as the Tobit test and other techniques. From the perspective of time series evolution, the construction of digital villages grew continuously, with a peak in 2020. After that, the speed of digital village construction slowed down slightly because of economic changes in both domestic and international environments. In terms of dynamic evolution, the core density curve of China’s digital rural construction shifted to the right between 2011 and 2021, accompanied by gradient influence and a multipolar development trend; local general budget revenue, the per capita disposable income of rural residents, rural infrastructure investment, computer ownership per 100 rural residents, added value of primary industry, education level, and rural power generation are some of the factors that affect the development level of China’s digital countryside. This study is helpful in understanding the influencing aspects of China’s digital rural construction, thereby facilitating the formation of suitable digital rural development strategies in various regions depending on the real scenario.

Suggested Citation

  • Xizi Cao & Mingyi Yan & Jun Wen, 2023. "Exploring the Level and Influencing Factors of Digital Village Development in China: Insights and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10423-:d:1185187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10423/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10423/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anders Akerman & Ingvil Gaarder & Magne Mogstad, 2015. "The Skill Complementarity of Broadband Internet," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(4), pages 1781-1824.
    2. Yuexu Zhao & Ruyue Li, 2022. "Coupling and Coordination Analysis of Digital Rural Construction from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization: A Case Study from Zhejiang Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Park, JungHo & Choi, WonGeun & Jeong, TaeYun & Seo, JinJae, 2023. "Digital twins and land management in South Korea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    4. Xie, Chengyuan & Jin, Xiaotong, 2023. "The role of digitalization, sustainable environment, natural resources and political globalization towards economic well-being in China, Japan and South Korea," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Kupriyanova, M. & Dronov, V. & Gordova, T., . "Digital Divide of Rural Territories in Russia," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 11(3).
    6. Serdar Yilmaz & Kingley E. Haynes & Mustafa Dinc, 2002. "Geographic and Network Neighbors: Spillover Effects of Telecommunications Infrastructure," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 339-360, May.
    7. Galasso, Emanuela & Ravallion, Martin, 2005. "Decentralized targeting of an antipoverty program," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(4), pages 705-727, April.
    8. Haenssgen, Marco J., 2018. "The struggle for digital inclusion: Phones, healthcare, and marginalisation in rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 358-374.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xin Zhao & Rong Zhao, 2024. "The Impact and Mechanism of Digital Villages on Agricultural Resilience in Ecologically Fragile Ethnic Areas: Evidence from China’s Provinces," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Yupan Zhao & Xiaofeng Zhao & Jielun Yang, 2024. "Coupling Coordination and Influencing Factors Between Digital Village Development and Agricultural and Rural Modernization: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Yuan Tian & Yuxi Zhou, 2025. "Coupling coordination of digital village construction and high-quality agricultural development in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Ming Lei & Xinyu Yang & Shuifeng Hong & Dandan Wang & Wei Zhang & Hui Chen, 2025. "Sustainable Digital Rural Development: Measurements, Dynamic Evolutions, and Regional Disparities—A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertschek, Irene & Briglauer, Wolfgang & Hüschelrath, Kai & Kauf, Benedikt & Niebel, Thomas, 2016. "The economic impacts of telecommunications networks and broadband internet: A survey," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-056, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Mingyi Yan & Xizi Cao, 2024. "Digital Economy Development, Rural Land Certification, and Rural Industrial Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Meitong Lu & Qi Luo & Dawei Feng, 2023. "Ecological innovation effect of broadband network infrastructure: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 1978-1994, June.
    4. Gao, Dengyun & Liu, Chang & Sun, Zhanwei, 2025. "Data elements and corporate innovation: A discussion of corporate innovation strategy," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Patricia Kotnik & Eva Hagsten, 2018. "ICT use as a determinant of export activity in manufacturing and service firms: Multi-country evidence," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(1), pages 103-128.
    6. John Carter Braxton & Kyle F. Herkenhoff & Jonathan Rothbaum & Lawrence Schmidt, 2021. "Changing Income Risk across the US Skill Distribution: Evidence from a Generalized Kalman Filter," Opportunity and Inclusive Growth Institute Working Papers 55, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    7. Shigeru Fujita & Madison Perry, 2024. "Nonworking Parents or Hungry Children," Economic Insights, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, vol. 9(4), pages 2-9, December.
    8. Barth, Erling & Davis, James C. & Freeman, Richard B. & McElheran, Kristina, 2023. "Twisting the demand curve: Digitalization and the older workforce," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 443-467.
    9. Araujo, M. Caridad & Ferreira, Francisco H.G. & Lanjouw, Peter & Özler, Berk, 2008. "Local inequality and project choice: Theory and evidence from Ecuador," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(5-6), pages 1022-1046, June.
    10. Luca Maria Pesando & Valentina Rotondi & Manuela Stranges & Ridhi Kashyap & Francesco C. Billari, 2021. "The Internetization of International Migration," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 47(1), pages 79-111, March.
    11. Zhiyuan Xu & Fuyan Ke & Jiajie Yu & Haotian Zhang, 2025. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Eco-Environmental Response to Land Use Transformation in China’s Southern Hilly Area During 2000–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Victoria Gunnarsson & Peter F. Orazem & Mario A. Sánchez & Aimee Verdisco, 2009. "Does Local School Control Raise Student Outcomes? Evidence on the Roles of School Autonomy and Parental Participation," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(1), pages 25-52, October.
    13. David J. Deming, 2017. "The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(4), pages 1593-1640.
    14. repec:iab:iabjlr:v:53:i:1:p:art.7 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Maya Eden & Paul Gaggl, 2018. "On the Welfare Implications of Automation," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 29, pages 15-43, July.
    16. Malgouyres, Clément & Mayer, Thierry & Mazet-Sonilhac, Clément, 2021. "Technology-induced trade shocks? Evidence from broadband expansion in France," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Younjun Kim & Eric Thompson, 2021. "Routine-Biased Technological Change and Declining Employment Rate of Immigrants," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 47(3), pages 319-353, June.
    18. Ravallion, Martin, 2005. "Inequality is bad for the poor," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3677, The World Bank.
    19. Philippe Aghion & Antonin Bergeaud & Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith, 2019. "The Innovation Premium to Soft Skills in Low-Skilled Occupations," Working papers 739, Banque de France.
    20. Benjamin Faber & Rosa Sanchis-Guarner & Felix Weinhardt, 2015. "ICT and Education: Evidence from Student Home Addresses," SERC Discussion Papers 0186, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    21. Ma, Zhuoya & Xiao, Hui & Li, Jing & Chen, Hanting & Chen, Wenhui, 2025. "Study on how the digital economy affects urban carbon emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10423-:d:1185187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.