IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4640-d1405342.html

Digital Economy Development, Rural Land Certification, and Rural Industrial Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Mingyi Yan

    (Department of Statistics, School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Xizi Cao

    (Department of Statistics, School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

Abstract

Rural industrial integration refers to the process of relying on technological innovation and industrial model innovation to promote the optimal allocation of factors such as land, capital, and labor in rural areas, promote the optimization of a rural industrial structure, rural property rights stability, agricultural and rural development, and ultimately achieve the extension of the agricultural industry chain and improvements in farmers’ income levels. In order to grasp the mechanism of digital economy and rural land certification on rural industrial integration, this paper analyzes the impact of digital economy development and rural land certification on rural industrial integration based on the 2011–2021 panel data of the Yangtze River Economic Belt at the municipal level. Research has shown the following. (1) The early development of the digital economy significantly promoted the integration of rural industries. After overcoming the turning point of the digital economy, the digital economy has a restraining effect on the integration of rural industries; in terms of controlling variables, the education level of rural residents, regional economic development level, per capita disposable income of rural residents, and rural power generation all significantly promote the process of rural industrial integration. (2) Rural land certification has played a positive transmission role by confirming, reviewing, and registering land ownership in accordance with the law, clarifying the ownership of land rights, providing a stable property rights foundation for rural industrial integration, and effectively promoting rural industrial integration. (3) The impact of the digital economy on rural industrial integration has a single threshold effect, and after crossing the threshold value of a rural population, the positive impact of the digital economy on industrial integration is more significant. (4) The development of the digital economy has significantly improved the integration level of rural industries in this region and neighboring areas. The above conclusions have important policy implications for further leveraging the digital economy to promote the integration of rural industries and the modernization of agriculture and rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingyi Yan & Xizi Cao, 2024. "Digital Economy Development, Rural Land Certification, and Rural Industrial Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4640-:d:1405342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4640/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4640/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bu, Di & Liao, Yin, 2022. "Land property rights and rural enterprise growth: Evidence from land titling reform in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Satish Nambisan, 2017. "Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(6), pages 1029-1055, November.
    3. Fu, Changluan & Sun, Xinyue & Guo, Mengting & Yu, Chenyang, 2024. "Can digital inclusive finance facilitate productive investment in rural households?–An empirical study based on the China Household Finance Survey," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    4. Song, Mingjie & Wu, Yuling & Chen, Lu, 2020. "Does the land titling program promote rural housing land transfer in China? Evidence from household surveys in Hubei Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. E. Fred Koller, 1950. "Vertical Integration of Agricultural Cooperatives," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(4_Part_2), pages 1048-1058.
    6. Beck, Thorsten & Lu, Liping & Yang, Rudai, 2015. "Finance and Growth for Microenterprises: Evidence from Rural China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 38-56.
    7. Richard F. J. Haans & Constant Pieters & Zi-Lin He, 2016. "Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1177-1195, July.
    8. Yang, Bo & Ma, Fang & Deng, Weihua & Pi, Yang, 2022. "Digital inclusive finance and rural household subsistence consumption in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 627-642.
    9. Peng, Zhuangzhuang & Dan, Ting, 2023. "Digital dividend or digital divide? Digital economy and urban-rural income inequality in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9).
    10. Park, JungHo & Choi, WonGeun & Jeong, TaeYun & Seo, JinJae, 2023. "Digital twins and land management in South Korea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Ali, Daniel Ayalew & Deininger, Klaus & Mahofa, Godfrey & Nyakulama, Rhona, 2021. "Sustaining land registration benefits by addressing the challenges of reversion to informality in Rwanda," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    12. Galasso, Emanuela & Ravallion, Martin, 2005. "Decentralized targeting of an antipoverty program," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(4), pages 705-727, April.
    13. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    14. Heping Ge & Bowen Li & Decai Tang & Hao Xu & Valentina Boamah, 2022. "Research on Digital Inclusive Finance Promoting the Integration of Rural Three-Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Hansen, Bruce E., 1999. "Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 345-368, December.
    16. Prince Donkor Ameyaw & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Toward Smart Land Management: Land Acquisition and the Associated Challenges in Ghana. A Look into a Blockchain Digital Land Registry for Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Flower, Benjamin C.R. & Ganepola, Piyal & Popuri, Srinivasa & Turkstra, Jan, 2023. "Securing tenure for conflict-affected populations: A case study of land titling and fit-for-purpose land administration in post-conflict Sri Lanka," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    18. Wang, Jing, 2023. "Digital inclusive finance and rural revitalization," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    19. Gao, Xuwen & Shi, Xinjie & Fang, Shile, 2021. "Property rights and misallocation: Evidence from land certification in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Mequanint B. Melesse & Erwin Bulte, 2015. "Does land registration and certification boost farm productivity? Evidence from Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 46(6), pages 757-768, November.
    21. De la O Campos, Ana Paula & Edouard, Fabrice & Salvago, Marta Ruiz, 2023. "Effects of land titling on household tenure security and investments: Evidence from Nicaragua," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    22. Zepu Zhang & Chen Sun & Jing Wang, 2023. "How Can the Digital Economy Promote the Integration of Rural Industries—Taking China as an Example," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yunke Deng & Haixin Tao & Bolun Yao & Xuezhu Shi, 2025. "The Impact of Digital Infrastructure on Rural Household Financial Vulnerability: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from the Broadband China Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Yun Shen & Yanxi Jing & Yiyue Liu, 2025. "Unveiling the Spatial Coupling Dynamics and Coordination Mechanisms Between Digital Inclusive Finance and Rural Industrial Integration Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Jiabin Han & Wenbin Wei & Wenting Ge & Shuyun Liu & Yixiu Chou, 2025. "Digital Technology and Agricultural Production Agglomeration: Mechanisms, Spatial Spillovers, and Heterogeneous Effects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Zhenyu Qi & Zixing Wu & Yuezhou You & Xiaoying Zhan, 2024. "Can Rural Industrial Convergence Alleviate Urban–Rural Income Inequality?: Empirical Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, December.
    5. Yong Feng & Shuokai Wang & Fangping Cao, 2025. "The Impact of Rural Digital Economy Development on Agricultural Carbon Emission Efficiency: A Study of the N-Shaped Relationship," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-29, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Hong & Wang, Yuejing & Wang, Xiaoquan, 2024. "The impact of financial deepening on agricultural production: A household-level analysis of BigTech finance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 57-77.
    2. Tian, Chuanhao & Luo, Yichen & Teng, Yu, 2024. "Land certification, tenure security and off-farm employment: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Klaus W. Deininger & Thea Hilhorst & Zevenbergen,Jaap & Nkurunziza,Emmanuel, 2025. "Capitalizing on Digital Transformation to Enhance the Effectiveness of Property Institutions : Conceptual Background and Evidence from 85 Countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11100, The World Bank.
    4. Wang, Shucui & Peng, Ting & Du, Anna Min & Lin, Xiaohui, 2025. "The impact of the digital economy on rural industrial revitalization," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Ruofan Liao & Zhengtao Chen & Jirakom Sirisrisakulchai & Jianxu Liu, 2025. "Enhancing Rural Economic Sustainability in China Through Agricultural Socialization Services: A Novel Perspective on Spatial-Temporal Dynamics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, January.
    6. Xu, Guangyu & Chen, Huang, 2025. "Inclusive growth dilemma: Weighing the pros and cons of land market reform," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Ao Yang & Mao Yang & Fuyong Zhang & Aza Azlina Md Kassim & Peixu Wang, 2024. "Has Digital Financial Inclusion Curbed Carbon Emissions Intensity? Considering Technological Innovation and Green Consumption in China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 19127-19156, December.
    8. Dongshui Xie & Caiquan Bai & Huimin Wang & Qihang Xue, 2022. "The Land System and the Rise and Fall of China’s Rural Industrialization: Based on the Perspective of Institutional Change of Rural Collective Construction Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Wang, Changming & Liao, Hongwei & Zhu, Lei & He, Leihua, 2024. "The haze reduction effect in china under the digital economy," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Bo Yang & Xiangnan Wang & Tong Wu & Weihua Deng, 2023. "Reducing farmers' poverty vulnerability in China: The role of digital financial inclusion," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1445-1480, August.
    11. Yu Chen & Yijie Wang & Dawei Mei & Liang Wang, 2025. "Coupling Coordination and Influencing Factors Between Digital Economy and Urban–Rural Integration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, August.
    12. Xiaoyu Sun & Weijing Zhu & Aili Chen & Gangqiao Yang, 2022. "Land Certificated Program and Farmland “Stickiness” of Rural Labor: Based on the Perspective of Land Production Function," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Yichi Zhang & Yingen Hu & Min Wang & Hongyu Luo, 2025. "Does the “Three Rights Separation” System Improve the Economic Efficiency of Rural Residential Land Use?—Evidence from Yujiang and Deqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Hou, Xinshuo & He, Yan & Liu, Xin & Li, Dongyang & Zhang, Shijie, 2025. "Market segmentation and urban energy consumption: An analysis of threshold effects from an agglomeration perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    15. Lixin Zhou & Caiping Qu & Li Zhi, 2024. "Research on the Impact of Digital Infrastructure on Urban Breakthrough Green Innovation: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Mu Lin & Jingxin Gao & Yongjie Du & Pengyu Ren, 2023. "Mismatch in Urban Construction Land Use and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Wang, Hui & Wang, Wen-Nanxiang & Xiong, Liming, 2025. "Digital rural pilot policies, financial service innovations, and rural industrial transformation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    18. Thomas Straubhaar & Marc Suhrcke & Dieter Urban, 2002. "Divergence. Is it Geography?," Development Working Papers 158, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano.
    19. Wang, Jianying & Qi, Chengyu & Guo, Qing, 2024. "FinTech, industrial convergence, and farmers’ prosperity," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    20. Yang Yu & Fangrong Ren & Yun Ju & Jingyi Zhang & Xiaoyan Liu, 2024. "Exploring the Role of Digital Transformation and Breakthrough Innovation in Enhanced Performance of Energy Enterprises: Fresh Evidence for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4640-:d:1405342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.