IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v8y2019i3p91-d212728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Plant Variety Protection Regulations on the Governance of Agri-Food Value Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Antonella Di Fonzo

    (Department of Economics and Law, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino (FR), Italy)

  • Vanessa Nardone

    (Department of Economics and Law, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino (FR), Italy)

  • Negin Fathinejad

    (Department of Economics and Law, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino (FR), Italy)

  • Carlo Russo

    (Department of Economics and Law, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino (FR), Italy)

Abstract

More than 25 years after the 1991 reform of the Union for the Protection of New Plant Varieties (UPOV) treaty, the regulation of Plant Variety Protection (PVP) is still controversial. While the incentives to private innovations are unquestionable, concerns have been raised about farmers’ access to resources, the weakening of their bargaining power, their entrepreneurial freedom, and ultimately their welfare. Our paper investigates the effect of PVP regulation on the governance of agri-food value chains (AFVC) with a small-scale survey of kiwi producers in Italy. We found that AFVC trading-protected (club) plant varieties are more likely to exhibit captive governance forms than those trading the free varieties. Nevertheless, the producers of club kiwis achieve higher returns from their investments and bear less risk than others. Because of the high demand for the club fruits, the breeders must give farmers highly profitable contract terms in order to elicit the production and to promote the adoption of the new cultivar. As a consequence, farmers are capturing a share of the value of innovation, even if the breeders have a strong protection. The long-run sustainability of this win-win agreement between breeders and farmers might be jeopardized should the demand for the new varieties fall.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonella Di Fonzo & Vanessa Nardone & Negin Fathinejad & Carlo Russo, 2019. "The Impact of Plant Variety Protection Regulations on the Governance of Agri-Food Value Chains," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:91-:d:212728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/3/91/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/3/91/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Carbone, 2017. "Erratum to: Food supply chains: coordination governance and other shaping forces," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-1, December.
    2. Campi, Mercedes & Nuvolari, Alessandro, 2015. "Intellectual property protection in plant varieties: A worldwide index (1961–2011)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 951-964.
    3. Giancarlo Moschini & Harvey Lapan, 1997. "Intellectual Property Rights and the Welfare Effects of Agricultural R&D," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(4), pages 1229-1242.
    4. Raustiala, Kal & Victor, David G., 2004. "The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(2), pages 277-309, April.
    5. Tripp, Robert & Louwaars, Niels & Eaton, Derek, 2007. "Plant variety protection in developing countries. A report from the field," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 354-371, June.
    6. Claude Ménard, 2005. "New institutions for governing the agri-food industry," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 32(3), pages 421-440, September.
    7. Sanderson,Jay, 2017. "Plants, People and Practices," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107126497, Enero-Abr.
    8. Clodia Vurro & Angeloantonio Russo & Francesco Perrini, 2009. "Shaping Sustainable Value Chains: Network Determinants of Supply Chain Governance Models," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(4), pages 607-621, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iciar Pavez & Louis-Antoine Saïsset & Leïla Temri & Zouhair Bouhsina, 2022. "Agrifood chain characteristics and sustainability signalling [Caractéristiques des chaînes agroalimentaires et signalisation de la durabilité]," Post-Print hal-03856271, HAL.
    2. Pedro Andres Garzon Delvaux & Heinrich Hockmann & Peter Voigt & Pavel Ciaian & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2018. "The impact of private R&D on the performance of food-processing firms: Evidence from Europe, Japan and North America," JRC Research Reports JRC104144, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Charity Ruramai Nhemachena & Johann F. Kirsten & Binganidzo Muchara, 2019. "The Effects of Plant Breeders’ Rights on Wheat Productivity and Varietal Improvement in South African Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Alston, Julian M. & Freebairn, John W. & James, Jennifer S., 2004. "Levy-funded research choices by producers and society," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(01), pages 1-32.
    5. Reinsberg,Bernhard Wilfried & Michaelowa,Katharina & Knack,Stephen, 2015. "Which donors, which funds ? the choice of multilateral funds by bilateral donors at the World Bank," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7441, The World Bank.
    6. Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2008. "The consequences of voluntary traceability system for supply chain relationships. An application of transaction cost economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 560-569, December.
    7. Massa, Silvia & Testa, Stefania, 2011. "Beyond the conventional-specialty dichotomy in food retailing business models: An Italian case study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 476-482.
    8. Nathan, Iben & Chen, Jie & Hansen, Christian Pilegaard & Xu, Bin & Li, Yan, 2018. "Facing the complexities of the global timber trade regime: How do Chinese wood enterprises respond to international legality verification requirements, and what are the implications for regime effecti," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 169-180.
    9. Agni Kalfagianni & Oran R. Young, 2022. "The politics of multilateral environmental agreements lessons from 20 years of INEA," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 245-262, June.
    10. repec:pcz:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:33-44 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Fu Jia & Yan Jiang, 2018. "Sustainable Global Sourcing: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, February.
    12. Fuß, Julia & Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian & Saravia, Andrés & Zürn, Michael, 2021. "Managing regime complexity: Introducing the interface conflicts 1.0 dataset," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2021-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    13. George Dikaios & Spyros Blavoukos, 2023. "Influencing the International Transport Regime Complex: The EU’s Climate Action in ICAO and IMO," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 62-71.
    14. Cloete, Kandas & Pienaar, Louw & Van der Merwe, Melissa, 2023. "Is persistent “loadshedding” pulling the plug on agriculture in the Western Cape, South Africa?," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 62(3-4), November.
    15. Frisvold, George B. & Reeves, Jeanne M., 2008. "The costs and benefits of refuge requirements: The case of Bt cotton," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 87-97, March.
    16. Naseem, Anwar & Singla, Rohit, 2013. "Ex Ante Economic Impact Analysis of Novel Traits in Canola," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Oliver Westerwinter, 2021. "Transnational public-private governance initiatives in world politics: Introducing a new dataset," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 137-174, January.
    18. Qaim, Matin & de Janvry, Alain, 2002. "Bt Cotton In Argentina: Analyzing Adoption And Farmers' Willingness To Pay," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19710, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Foltz, Jeremy D. & Kim, Kwansoo & Barham, Bradford L., 2001. "A Dynamic Count Data Analysis of University Ag-Biotech Patents," Research Reports 25230, University of Connecticut, Food Marketing Policy Center.
    20. Md Maruf Hossan Chowdhury & Mohammad Tarikul Islam & Imran Ali & Mohammed Quaddus, 2024. "The role of social capital, resilience, and network complexity in attaining supply chain sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2621-2639, March.
    21. GianCarlo Moschini, 2008. "Biotechnology and the development of food markets: retrospect and prospects," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 35(3), pages 331-355, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:91-:d:212728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.