IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v175y2026ics0967070x25004147.html

Barriers, solutions and benefits of sharing electric vehicle charging infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Govik, Lisa
  • Wallström, Henrik

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) are a potential solution in the transition to more sustainable transport. However, this transition requires not only new vehicles but also expanded electric vehicle charging infrastructure (EVCI). This study aims to investigate the main barriers to implementing shared EVCI and potential solutions. A qualitative approach was adopted, collecting data from expert focus groups. The study identifies barriers including insufficient knowledge about technologies and business models, a lack of viable business models, infrastructure limitations, regulatory obstacles, and the need for multi-actor collaboration, which requires building trust. Business models need to be tested before being scaled up, and tools for booking EVCI should be integrated into transport planning. Policymakers should support demonstration projects, revise regulations that hinder EVCI sharing, and extend discussions beyond passenger cars to include heavy vehicles. Given the nascent nature of EVCI sharing, developing and disseminating knowledge is critical to overcoming a variety of barriers. We find that solutions enabling booking, integration with energy storage, and scalability would help address technology and infrastructure barriers. Creating a collaborative network for sharing would reduce barriers related to business models, culture, and values. To overcome policy and regulatory barriers, additional incentives are needed to promote sharing, offering potential economic, environmental, and social sustainability benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Govik, Lisa & Wallström, Henrik, 2026. "Barriers, solutions and benefits of sharing electric vehicle charging infrastructure," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:175:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25004147
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25004147
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schulz, Felix & Rode, Johannes, 2022. "Public charging infrastructure and electric vehicles in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Magnusson, Thomas & Onufrey, Ksenia & Werner, Viktor & Gillström, Henrik, 2025. "Inter-system linkage formation in multi-system transitions: Incumbents, asymmetries and learning cycles," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    3. Şükrü İmre & Dilay Çelebi & Umut Asan, 2024. "Estimating potential adoption rate of electric vehicles in urban logistics," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 370-399, April.
    4. Torkey, Alaa & Abdelgawad, Hossam, 2022. "Framework for planning of EV charging infrastructure: Where should cities start?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 193-208.
    5. Bankel, Amanda & Mignon, Ingrid, 2022. "Solar business models from a firm perspective – an empirical study of the Swedish market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Colovic, Aleksandra & Marinelli, Mario & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2024. "Towards the electrification of freight transport: A network design model for assessing the adoption of eHighways," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 106-120.
    7. Zhang, Junjie & Jia, Rongwen & Yang, Hangjun & Dong, Kangyin, 2022. "Does electric vehicle promotion in the public sector contribute to urban transport carbon emissions reduction?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 151-163.
    8. Dehkordi, Rashid & Ahokangas, Petri & Evers, Natasha & Sorvisto, Mika, 2024. "Business model design for Electric Commercial Vehicles (ECVs): An ecosystemic perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    9. Lee, Henry & Clark, Alex, 2018. "Charging the Future: Challenges and Opportunities for Electric Vehicle Adoption," Working Paper Series rwp18-026, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    10. Tao, Miaomiao, 2024. "Dynamics between electric vehicle uptake and green development: Understanding the role of local government competition," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 227-240.
    11. LaMonaca, Sarah & Ryan, Lisa, 2022. "The state of play in electric vehicle charging services – A review of infrastructure provision, players, and policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Linda E. Karjalainen & Sirkku Juhola, 2021. "Urban transportation sustainability assessments: a systematic review of literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 659-684, September.
    13. Fisher, Robert J, 1993. "Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(2), pages 303-315, September.
    14. Quddus, Md Abdul & Shahvari, Omid & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Usher, John M. & Jaradat, Raed, 2018. "A collaborative energy sharing optimization model among electric vehicle charging stations, commercial buildings, and power grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 841-857.
    15. Das, H.S. & Rahman, M.M. & Li, S. & Tan, C.W., 2020. "Electric vehicles standards, charging infrastructure, and impact on grid integration: A technological review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Luo, Qi & Yin, Yunlei & Chen, Pengyu & Zhan, Zhenfei & Saigal, Romesh, 2022. "Dynamic subsidies for synergistic development of charging infrastructure and electric vehicle adoption," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 117-136.
    17. Globisch, Joachim & Plötz, Patrick & Dütschke, Elisabeth & Wietschel, Martin, 2019. "Consumer preferences for public charging infrastructure for electric vehicles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 54-63.
    18. Govindan, Kannan & Shankar, K. Madan & Kannan, Devika, 2020. "Achieving sustainable development goals through identifying and analyzing barriers to industrial sharing economy: A framework development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    19. Morganti, Eleonora & Browne, Michael, 2018. "Technical and operational obstacles to the adoption of electric vans in France and the UK: An operator perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 90-97.
    20. Hopkins, Emma & Potoglou, Dimitris & Orford, Scott & Cipcigan, Liana, 2023. "Can the equitable roll out of electric vehicle charging infrastructure be achieved?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    21. Liu, Bingchun & Song, Jiangji & Wang, Qingshan & Xu, Yan & Liu, Yifan, 2023. "Charging station forecasting and scenario analysis in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 87-98.
    22. Dubois, Anna & Gadde, Lars-Erik, 2002. "Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 553-560, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Yong-Jin Alex & Nilsson, Isabelle, 2025. "Estimating the effect of a state-level charging infrastructure funding program on plug-in electric vehicle adoption," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Fescioglu-Unver, Nilgun & Yıldız Aktaş, Melike, 2023. "Electric vehicle charging service operations: A review of machine learning applications for infrastructure planning, control, pricing and routing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Antonia Golab & Sebastian Zwickl-Bernhard & Hans Auer, 2022. "Minimum-Cost Fast-Charging Infrastructure Planning for Electric Vehicles along the Austrian High-Level Road Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Ghani, Affiq A. & Abdullah, Norulsamani & B, Kalidasan & Saidur, R. & Pandey, A.K., 2025. "Assessing technological-driven challenges and policies associated with electric vehicle (EV) adoption," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 167-177.
    5. Kumar, Vikas & Kaushik, Arun Kumar & Noravesh, Farima & Sindhwani, Rahul & Mathiyazhagan, K., 2025. "Green drives: Understanding how environmental propensity, range and technological anxiety shape electric vehicle adoption intentions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    6. Benoliel, Peter & Taylor, Margaret & Coburn, Timothy & Desai, Ranjit R. & Schey, Stephen & Gerdes, Mindy & Peng, Peng, 2025. "Soft costs and EVSE – Knowledge gaps as a barrier to successful projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 389(C).
    7. Jain, Monika & Singh, Archana, 2024. "An empirical study on electric vehicle adoption in India: A step towards a greener environment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 112-125.
    8. Javazi, Leila & Alinaghian, Mahdi & Khosroshahi, Hossein, 2025. "Evaluating government policies promoting electric vehicles, considering battery technology, energy saving, and charging infrastructure development: A game theoretic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
    9. Solvi Hoen, Fredrik & Díez-Gutiérrez, María & Babri, Sahar & Hess, Stephane & Tørset, Trude, 2023. "Charging electric vehicles on long trips and the willingness to pay to reduce waiting for charging. Stated preference survey in Norway," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    10. Li, Xiaohui & Wang, Zhenpo & Zhang, Lei & Sun, Fengchun & Cui, Dingsong & Hecht, Christopher & Figgener, Jan & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2023. "Electric vehicle behavior modeling and applications in vehicle-grid integration: An overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    11. Barman, Pranjal & Dutta, Lachit, 2024. "Charging infrastructure planning for transportation electrification in India: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    12. Cheng, Qian & Xiong, Yongqing & Qin, Jiaqi, 2025. "Toward carbon reduction in electric vehicle products: Evidence from China's recommended catalogue policy," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Adrian Chmielewski & Piotr Piórkowski & Jakub Możaryn & Stepan Ozana, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Operational Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles: A Case Study for Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-43, June.
    14. Elena Higueras‐Castillo & Francisco Liébana‐Cabanillas & Manuel Alonso Dos Santos & Katrin Zulauf & Ralf Wagner, 2024. "Do you believe it? Green advertising skepticism and perceived value in buying electric vehicles," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 4671-4685, October.
    15. Teresa Nogueira & José Magano & Ezequiel Sousa & Gustavo R. Alves, 2021. "The Impacts of Battery Electric Vehicles on the Power Grid: A Monte Carlo Method Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Gallaher, Adam & Graziano, Marcello & Fiaschetti, Maurizio, 2021. "Legacy and shockwaves: A spatial analysis of strengthening resilience of the power grid in Connecticut," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Pascal Dey & Chris Steyaert, 2016. "Rethinking the Space of Ethics in Social Entrepreneurship: Power, Subjectivity, and Practices of Freedom," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 627-641, February.
    18. Saarijärvi, Hannu & Mitronen, Lasse & Yrjölä, Mika, 2014. "From selling to supporting – Leveraging mobile services in the context of food retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36.
    19. Zhang, Hongjuan & Young, Michael N. & Tan, Justin & Sun, Weizheng, 2018. "How Chinese companies deal with a legitimacy imbalance when acquiring firms from developed economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 752-767.
    20. Anna Adamik & Michał Nowicki, 2019. "Pathologies and Paradoxes of Co-Creation: A Contribution to the Discussion about Corporate Social Responsibility in Building a Competitive Advantage in the Age of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-38, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:175:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25004147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.