IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v390y2025ics030626192500529x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating government policies promoting electric vehicles, considering battery technology, energy saving, and charging infrastructure development: A game theoretic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Javazi, Leila
  • Alinaghian, Mahdi
  • Khosroshahi, Hossein

Abstract

he cost and fear of running out of battery (range anxiety) are major obstacles to the widespread adoption of electric cars (EVs). Hence, the government's political actions have the potential to significantly mitigate the adverse impact of these issues on the adoption of electric vehicles. This research examines the supply chain of a battery electric vehicle (BEV), which includes the government, a BEV manufacturer, a charging infrastructure business (CI firm), and consumers. Next, we construct a game theory model employing Stackelberg's method to evaluate three distinct types of intervention policies: consumer-side intervention policy (V), production-side intervention policy (T), and charging service-side intervention policy (C). This analysis is conducted within the framework of two sustainable objectives: economic-environmental goal (EB) and socio-economic goal (SW). Policy V involves the government providing financial assistance or imposing fees on Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) customers. Policy T provides manufacturers with research and development subsidies to enhance battery technology, while policy (C) offers subsidies to CI firm to establish charging infrastructure. The findings provided significant insights for policymakers and decision-makers in several scenarios aligned with the government's multifaceted objectives. The findings suggest that T and C policies benefit the government, BEV maker, and CI firm most when the objective is SW. Additionally, these policies lead to the largest market demand. Suppose the government's objective is to promote electric vehicles (EVs). In that case, policy C yields the greatest advantage for the recipients when there is a strong emphasis on battery technology and the availability of charging infrastructure. Under policies T and C, the government incurs the largest subsidy cost while pursuing the SW target. Similarly, when pursuing the EB objective, the government incurs the highest subsidy cost under the V policy. In conclusion, this research demonstrates that all three intervention policies benefit the demand for battery electric vehicles (BEVs). Therefore, it is recommended that the government implement suitable policies based on the prevailing market conditions to promote the growth of sustainable transportation.

Suggested Citation

  • Javazi, Leila & Alinaghian, Mahdi & Khosroshahi, Hossein, 2025. "Evaluating government policies promoting electric vehicles, considering battery technology, energy saving, and charging infrastructure development: A game theoretic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:390:y:2025:i:c:s030626192500529x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192500529X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125799?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Ya-Fang & Zhang, Yue-Jun & Su, Bin, 2022. "Impact of government subsidy on the optimal R&D and advertising investment in the cooperative supply chain of new energy vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Zhongwei Chen & Zhi-Ping Fan, 2023. "Improvement strategies of battery driving range in an electric vehicle supply chain considering subsidy threshold and cost misreporting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(1), pages 89-113, July.
    3. Ding, Yanyan & Jian, Sisi, 2024. "Strategic investment in charging infrastructure: Sharing costs or taking over?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PA).
    4. Feng, Jian & Yao, Yifan & Liu, Zhenfeng & Liu, Zhenling, 2024. "Electric vehicle charging stations' installing strategies: Considering government subsidies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    5. Li, Yaoming & Zhang, Qi & Liu, Boyu & McLellan, Benjamin & Gao, Yuan & Tang, Yanyan, 2018. "Substitution effect of New-Energy Vehicle Credit Program and Corporate Average Fuel Consumption Regulation for Green-car Subsidy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 223-236.
    6. Clinton, Bentley C. & Steinberg, Daniel C., 2019. "Providing the Spark: Impact of financial incentives on battery electric vehicle adoption," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Stephane Hess & Mark Fowler & Thomas Adler & Aniss Bahreinian, 2012. "A joint model for vehicle type and fuel type choice: evidence from a cross-nested logit study," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 593-625, May.
    8. Elham Allahmoradi & Saeed Mirzamohammadi & Ali Bonyadi Naeini & Ali Maleki & Saleh Mobayen & Paweł Skruch, 2022. "Policy Instruments for the Improvement of Customers’ Willingness to Purchase Electric Vehicles: A Case Study in Iran," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Globisch, Joachim & Plötz, Patrick & Dütschke, Elisabeth & Wietschel, Martin, 2019. "Consumer preferences for public charging infrastructure for electric vehicles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 54-63.
    10. Brozynski, Max T. & Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2022. "A multi-level optimization model of infrastructure-dependent technology adoption: Overcoming the chicken-and-egg problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 755-770.
    11. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Chen, Yenming J., 2012. "Impact of government financial intervention on competition among green supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 201-213.
    12. Asgarian, Fariba & Hejazi, Seyed Reza & Khosroshahi, Hossein & Safarzadeh, Soroush, 2024. "Vehicle pricing considering EVs promotion and public transportation investment under governmental policies on sustainable transportation development: The case of Norway," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 204-221.
    13. Aurélie Glerum & Lidija Stankovikj & Michaël Thémans & Michel Bierlaire, 2014. "Forecasting the Demand for Electric Vehicles: Accounting for Attitudes and Perceptions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 483-499, November.
    14. Fontaínhas, José & Cunha, Jorge & Ferreira, Paula, 2016. "Is investing in an electric car worthwhile from a consumers' perspective?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P2), pages 1459-1477.
    15. Li, Kunpeng & Wang, Lan, 2023. "Optimal electric vehicle subsidy and pricing decisions with consideration of EV anxiety and EV preference in green and non-green consumers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    16. Kumar, Rajeev Ranjan & Chakraborty, Abhishek & Mandal, Prasenjit, 2021. "Promoting electric vehicle adoption: Who should invest in charging infrastructure?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Fanchao Liao & Eric Molin & Bert van Wee, 2017. "Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 252-275, May.
    18. Cecere, Grazia & Corrocher, Nicoletta & Guerzoni, Marco, 2018. "Price or performance? A probabilistic choice analysis of the intention to buy electric vehicles in European countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 19-32.
    19. Davidov, Sreten, 2020. "Optimal charging infrastructure planning based on a charging convenience buffer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    20. Qian, Lixian & Grisolía, Jose M. & Soopramanien, Didier, 2019. "The impact of service and government-policy attributes on consumer preferences for electric vehicles in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 70-84.
    21. Liu, Jing & Li, Lingyue & He, Lingling & Ma, Xiaozhi & Yuan, Hongping, 2024. "Consumers or infrastructure firms? Who should the government subsidize to promote electric vehicle adoption when considering the indirect network and herd effects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 163-176.
    22. Sierzchula, William & Bakker, Sjoerd & Maat, Kees & van Wee, Bert, 2014. "The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 183-194.
    23. Chen, Rongkai & Fan, Ruguo & Wang, Dongxue & Yao, Qianyi, 2023. "Effects of multiple incentives on electric vehicle charging infrastructure deployment in China: An evolutionary analysis in complex network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    24. Wenchao Yu & Linghong Zhang & Rui Lu & Junjie Ma, 2023. "Optimal number of charging station and pricing strategy for the electric vehicle with component commonality considering consumer range anxiety," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, May.
    25. Huang, Xingyu & Zheng, Pengjun & Liu, Guiyun, 2024. "Non-cooperative and Nash-bargaining game of a two-parallel maritime supply chain considering government subsidy and forwarder's CSR strategy: A dynamic perspective," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    26. Wang, Shanyong & Li, Jun & Zhao, Dingtao, 2017. "The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: Evidence from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 14-26.
    27. Guo, Shu & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Shen, Bin, 2020. "Green product development under competition: A study of the fashion apparel industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(2), pages 523-538.
    28. Shao, Jing & Jiang, Changmin & Cui, Yinglong & Tang, Yao, 2023. "A game-theoretic model to compare charging infrastructure subsidy and electric vehicle subsidy policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    29. LaMonaca, Sarah & Ryan, Lisa, 2022. "The state of play in electric vehicle charging services – A review of infrastructure provision, players, and policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    30. Ma, Shao-Chao & Xu, Jin-Hua & Fan, Ying, 2019. "Willingness to pay and preferences for alternative incentives to EV purchase subsidies: An empirical study in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 197-215.
    31. Jiangfeng Fu & Xiangfeng Chen & Qiying Hu, 2018. "Subsidizing strategies in a sustainable supply chain," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(2), pages 283-295, February.
    32. Poullikkas, Andreas, 2015. "Sustainable options for electric vehicle technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1277-1287.
    33. Dumortier, Jerome & Siddiki, Saba & Carley, Sanya & Cisney, Joshua & Krause, Rachel M. & Lane, Bradley W. & Rupp, John A. & Graham, John D., 2015. "Effects of providing total cost of ownership information on consumers’ intent to purchase a hybrid or plug-in electric vehicle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 71-86.
    34. Craglia, Matteo & Cullen, Jonathan, 2020. "Do vehicle efficiency improvements lead to energy savings? The rebound effect in Great Britain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip, Thara & Whitehead, Jake & Prato, Carlo G., 2023. "Adoption of electric vehicles in a laggard, car-dependent nation: Investigating the potential influence of V2G and broader energy benefits on adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Meilinda Fitriani Nur Maghfiroh & Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo & Hiroshi Onoda, 2021. "Current Readiness Status of Electric Vehicles in Indonesia: Multistakeholder Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Li, Lixu & Wang, Zhiqiang & Xie, Xiaoqing, 2022. "From government to market? A discrete choice analysis of policy instruments for electric vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 143-159.
    4. Shao, Jing & Jiang, Changmin & Cui, Yinglong & Tang, Yao, 2023. "A game-theoretic model to compare charging infrastructure subsidy and electric vehicle subsidy policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian & Soopramanien, Didier & Tyfield, David, 2021. "Buy, lease, or share? Consumer preferences for innovative business models in the market for electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Peng, Ruoqing & Tang, Justin Hayse Chiwing G. & Yang, Xiong & Meng, Meng & Zhang, Jie & Zhuge, Chengxiang, 2024. "Investigating the factors influencing the electric vehicle market share: A comparative study of the European Union and United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    7. Furqan A. Bhat & Ashish Verma, 2025. "Consumer intention to accept electric two-wheelers in India: a valence theory approach to unveil the role of identity and utility," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 537-577, April.
    8. Ji, Qing & Wang, Chunan & Fan, Ying, 2022. "Environmental and welfare effects of vehicle purchase tax: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Santos, Georgina & Rembalski, Sebastian, 2021. "Do electric vehicles need subsidies in the UK?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Pi, Zhenyang & Wang, Ke & Wei, Yi-Ming & Huang, Zhimin, 2024. "Transitioning from gasoline to electric vehicles: Electrification decision of automakers under purchase and station subsidies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Zhao, Xingrong & Ma, Ye & Shao, Shuai & Ma, Tieju, 2022. "What determines consumers' acceptance of electric vehicles: A survey in Shanghai, China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Aravena, C. & Denny, E., 2021. "The impact of learning and short-term experience on preferences for electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    13. Feng, Jian & Yao, Yifan & Liu, Zhenfeng & Liu, Zhenling, 2024. "Electric vehicle charging stations' installing strategies: Considering government subsidies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    14. Li, Ping & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2023. "The effects of new energy vehicle subsidies on air quality: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Yang, J. & Chen, F., 2021. "How are social-psychological factors related to consumer preferences for plug-in electric vehicles? Case studies from two cities in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Pellegrini, Andrea & Yao, Xusheng & Rose, John M. & Ma, Shoufeng, 2025. "An autoregressive spatial stochastic frontier analysis for quantifying the sales efficiency of the electric vehicle market: An application to 88 pilot cities in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Burra, Lavan T. & Sommer, Stephan & Vance, Colin, 2024. "Policy complementarities in the promotion of electric vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Jia, Wenjian & Jiang, Zhiqiu & Wang, Qian & Xu, Bin & Xiao, Mei, 2023. "Preferences for zero-emission vehicle attributes: Comparing early adopters with mainstream consumers in California," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 21-32.
    19. Bhat, Furqan A. & Verma, Ashish, 2024. "Electric two-wheeler adoption in India – A discrete choice analysis of motivators and barriers affecting the potential electric two-wheeler buyers," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 118-131.
    20. Gao, Jiong & Ma, Shoufeng & Zou, Hongyang & Du, Huibin, 2023. "How does population agglomeration influence the adoption of new energy vehicles? Evidence from 290 cities in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:390:y:2025:i:c:s030626192500529x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.