IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v163y2025icp370-383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the interdependent relationship of motorcyclist injury severity and fault status: A recursive bivariate random parameters probit approach

Author

Listed:
  • Se, Chamroeun
  • Woolley, Jeremy
  • Champahom, Thanapong
  • Jomnonkwao, Sajjakaj
  • Boonyoo, Tassana
  • Karoonsoontawong, Ampol
  • Ratanavaraha, Vatanavongs

Abstract

Motorcycles constitute the primary mode of transportation in Thailand. However, their prevalence has created an acute safety crisis, with motorcyclists representing over 70% of road fatalities. While previous studies have examined either injury severity or fault status in isolation, the potential interdependency between these outcomes remains poorly understood. This study addresses this gap by investigating motorcycle crash injury severity through both direct effects and indirect effects mediated through riders' at-fault status. This study examines motorcycle crash injury severity by considering both direct effects on outcomes and indirect effects mediated through riders' at-fault status. Analyses were conducted for three timeframes—2017–2018, 2019, and 2020—to capture potential temporal instability. A recursive bivariate modeling framework with random parameters was adopted to address unobserved heterogeneity and endogeneity between fault likelihood and crash severity outcomes, revealing key demographic, behavioral, and infrastructural predictors of fatal injuries. Findings indicate that younger riders, nighttime conditions, and high-risk behaviors (e.g., speeding, and alcohol use) increase the probability of being at fault. Meanwhile, factors such as being male, older, riding without a helmet, traveling against traffic, and riding at night significantly raise fatal injury risks. Although at-fault data provide valuable insights, they must be interpreted alongside roadway conditions, as Thailand's infrastructure offers limited protection for motorcyclists. Accordingly, this study recommends an integrated approach that combines improved infrastructure (e.g., motorcycle-friendly barriers and segregated lanes), robust education initiatives (targeting speed, helmet use, and alcohol awareness), and enhanced enforcement of traffic regulations. Implementing or enhancing licensing standards—such as a Graduated Licensing Scheme—can help curb risky behaviors and foster safer riding practices among young riders. These evidence-based recommendations can help policymakers develop more effective mitigation strategies to reduce the number of severe and fatal motorcycle-related crashes.

Suggested Citation

  • Se, Chamroeun & Woolley, Jeremy & Champahom, Thanapong & Jomnonkwao, Sajjakaj & Boonyoo, Tassana & Karoonsoontawong, Ampol & Ratanavaraha, Vatanavongs, 2025. "Modelling the interdependent relationship of motorcyclist injury severity and fault status: A recursive bivariate random parameters probit approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 370-383.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:163:y:2025:i:c:p:370-383
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000368
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:163:y:2025:i:c:p:370-383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.