IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v203y2025ics1366554525003874.html

A microsimulation study of curb space operational strategies and user behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Yuyang
  • Li, Chenhan
  • Lim, Jisoon
  • Masoud, Neda

Abstract

This paper introduces a Simulation of Urban MObility (SUMO) microscopic simulation model to examine curb space interactions and policy impacts. The model investigates user behaviors under different operational scenarios and user characteristics. Our study focuses on heterogeneous curb space zones derived from empirical observations in Ann Arbor, Michigan, to understand how user behaviors influence system performance. Through experiments, we explore dynamic responses to curb space policies based on individual curb space user traits and the actions of other users. In particular, we investigate the interactions between curb and non-curb users, the importance of accounting for curb user destinations in infrastructure design, and the effects of unlawful curb activities by some users on the utilities of other users and overall road performance. We propose practical measures to mitigate adverse effects, offering insights for developing curb space management strategies in dynamic urban settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Yuyang & Li, Chenhan & Lim, Jisoon & Masoud, Neda, 2025. "A microsimulation study of curb space operational strategies and user behaviors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:203:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525003874
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2025.104346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525003874
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manser, Patrick & Becker, Henrik & Hörl, Sebastian & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Designing a large-scale public transport network using agent-based microsimulation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-15.
    2. Sara Ezquerro & José Luis Moura & Borja Alonso, 2020. "Illegal Use of Loading Bays and Its Impact on the Use of Public Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, November.
    4. Marsden, Greg & Docherty, Iain & Dowling, Robyn, 2020. "Parking futures: Curbside management in the era of ‘new mobility’ services in British and Australian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Anderson, Paul & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2020. "Dynamic lane restrictions on congested arterials," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 224-243.
    6. Shaheen, Susan & Cohen, Adam & Broader, Jacquelyn, 2021. "What’s the ‘Big’ Deal with Shared Micromobility?Evolution, Curb Policy, and Potential Developments in North America," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt7hn6w05t, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Reed, Sara & Campbell, Ann Melissa & Thomas, Barrett W., 2024. "Does parking matter? The impact of parking time on last-mile delivery optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    8. Zhou, Xizhen & Lv, Mengqi & Ji, Yanjie & Zhang, Shuichao & Liu, Yong, 2023. "Pricing curb parking: Differentiated parking fees or cash rewards?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 46-58.
    9. Jisoon Lim & Neda Masoud, 2024. "Dynamic Usage Allocation and Pricing for Curb Space Operation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1252-1276, November.
    10. Shoup, Donald, 2007. "Cruising for Parking," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6sn7s1x2, University of California Transportation Center.
    11. Vladislav Krivda & Jan Petru & David Macha & Jakub Novak, 2021. "Use of Microsimulation Traffic Models as Means for Ensuring Public Transport Sustainability and Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-38, March.
    12. Jaller, Miguel, 2021. "Curbside Management Is Critical for Minimizing Emissions and Congestion," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7q69b37f, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    13. Nourinejad, Mehdi & Wenneman, Adam & Habib, Khandker Nurul & Roorda, Matthew J., 2014. "Truck parking in urban areas: Application of choice modelling within traffic microsimulation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 54-64.
    14. Rodríguez, Andrés & Cordera, Rubén & Alonso, Borja & dell'Olio, Luigi & Benavente, Juan, 2022. "Microsimulation parking choice and search model to assess dynamic pricing scenarios," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 253-269.
    15. McFadden, Daniel, 1974. "The measurement of urban travel demand," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 303-328, November.
    16. Jiachao Liu & Sean Qian, 2024. "Modeling Multimodal Curbside Usage in Dynamic Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1277-1299, November.
    17. Xie, Minghui & Zhang, Xinying & Wu, Zhouhao & Wei, Sen & Gao, Yanan & Wang, Yuanqing, 2023. "A shared parking optimization framework based on dynamic resource allocation and path planning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 616(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akter, Shanjeeda & Aziz, HM Abdul, 2025. "Demand uncertainty aware curbside space allocation planning in shared-use transportation networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Frick, Bernd & Barros, Carlos Pestana & Prinz, Joachim, 2010. "Analysing head coach dismissals in the German "Bundesliga" with a mixed logit approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 151-159, January.
    3. Villas-Boas, Sofia B & Taylor, Rebecca & Krovetz, Hannah, 2016. "Willingness to Pay for Low Water Footprint Food Choices During Drought," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt9vh3x180, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    4. Onil Boussim, 2025. "Compositional difference-in-differences," Papers 2510.11659, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    5. Ju-Hee Kim & Younggew Kim & Seung-Hoon Yoo, 2021. "Using a choice experiment to explore the public willingness to pay for the impacts of improving energy efficiency of an apartment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1775-1793, October.
    6. Ermagun, Alireza & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2018. "To bid or not to bid: An empirical study of the supply determinants of crowd-shipping," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 468-483.
    7. Deka, Devajyoti & Carnegie, Jon, 2021. "Predicting transit mode choice of New Jersey workers commuting to New York City from a stated preference survey," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Batarce, Marco & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2016. "Valuing crowding in public transport: Implications for cost-benefit analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 358-378.
    9. Jumbe, Charles B.L. & Angelsen, Arild, 2011. "Modeling choice of fuelwood source among rural households in Malawi: A multinomial probit analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 732-738, September.
    10. François-Charles Wolff & Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu & Brice Trouillet & Alexia Pigeault & Nicolas Rollo, 2026. "Participatory democracy in question: The case of “the sea in debate”," Post-Print hal-05473955, HAL.
    11. Kim, Chul & Jun, Duk Bin & Park, Sungho, 2018. "Capturing flexible correlations in multiple-discrete choice outcomes using copulas," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 34-59.
    12. Liu, Gang, 2007. "A behavioral model of work-trip mode choice in Shanghai," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 456-476.
    13. Woo, JongRoul & Moon, Sungho & Choi, Hyunhong, 2022. "Economic value and acceptability of advanced solar power systems for multi-unit residential buildings: The case of South Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    14. Olsthoorn, Mark & Schleich, Joachim & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte & Durand, Antoine & Faure, Corinne, 2023. "Beyond energy efficiency: Do consumers care about life-cycle properties of household appliances?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    15. Vidale, E & Pettenella, D & Gatto, P & Secco, L, 23. "What can we sell behind timber production?," Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, issue 44, May.
    16. Claudio Mirabella & Valeria Borsellino & Antonino Galati & Emanuele Schimmenti & Francesco Caracciolo, 2025. "Enhancing ethical food consumption: the impact of information framing on consumer preferences," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Galanis, Giorgos & Kollias, Iraklis & Leventides, Ioanis & Lustenhouwer, Joep, 2025. "Generalizing heuristic switching models and a (boundedly) rational route away from randomness," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    18. Léa Marchal & Claire Naiditch, 2020. "How Borrowing Constraints Hinder Migration: Theoretical Insights from a Random Utility Maximization Model," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 122(2), pages 732-761, April.
    19. Panchalingam, Thadchaigeni & Howard, Gregory & Allen Klaiber, H. & Roe, Brian E., 2023. "Food choice behavior of adolescents under parent-child interaction in the context of US school lunch programs," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    20. Di Ciommo, Floridea & Monzón, Andrés & Fernandez-Heredia, Alvaro, 2013. "Improving the analysis of road pricing acceptability surveys by using hybrid models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 302-316.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:203:y:2025:i:c:s1366554525003874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.