Author
Listed:
- Claudio Mirabella
(Università degli Studi di Palermo)
- Valeria Borsellino
(Università degli Studi di Palermo)
- Antonino Galati
(Università degli Studi di Palermo)
- Emanuele Schimmenti
(Università degli Studi di Palermo)
- Francesco Caracciolo
(Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II)
Abstract
Cases of unethical working conditions of agricultural workers, particularly in specialized rural regions of Europe such as Italy, have received increasing attention, calling for solutions to guarantee fair labor practices. This study investigates how Italian consumers respond to information about these issues by focusing on the framing of ethical attributes through a “Fair Labor” hypothetical certification designed to guarantee decent work and fair wages. Using a discrete choice experiment with three distinct information treatments, the paper explores the differential impact of negative versus positive framing of information on consumer decision-making. The results reveal that emotionally charged, negative information highlighting the consequences of unethical labor practices is particularly effective in amplifying consumer interest in ethical certifications. Conversely, positive framing, while still impactful, proves less influential in shaping preferences. Furthermore, trust in the certification is a critical factor in fostering favorable attitudes. These findings highlight the strategic importance of framing in promoting ethical certifications, offering valuable insights for policymakers and businesses aiming to enhance transparency and responsibility in agricultural supply chains while meeting the growing consumer demand for fair labor practices.
Suggested Citation
Claudio Mirabella & Valeria Borsellino & Antonino Galati & Emanuele Schimmenti & Francesco Caracciolo, 2025.
"Enhancing ethical food consumption: the impact of information framing on consumer preferences,"
Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:13:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-025-00371-9
DOI: 10.1186/s40100-025-00371-9
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:13:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-025-00371-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.