IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v225y2026ics0040162526000302.html

Waste management–related trust, acceptance, and reputation: A multidisciplinary big data analysis across knowledge domains

Author

Listed:
  • Nuortimo, Kalle
  • Härkönen, Janne
  • Breznik, Kristijan

Abstract

Addressing global waste management challenges requires understanding not only the technical capabilities of products and technologies but also the factors shaping their development and deployment across the waste hierarchy. Deployment outcomes are strongly influenced by acceptance, reputation, and trust, distinct yet interrelated constructs whose dynamics remain insufficiently understood. Deepening this understanding can enhance stakeholder engagement and improve decision-making in waste management. This study examines waste-to-energy incineration as a representative case to investigate these dynamics across global, regional, and local levels. A multidisciplinary, data-driven approach is applied, combining artificial intelligence, big data analytics, opinion mining, Correspondence Analysis on Generalized Aggregated Lexical Tables, and content classification to assess acceptance, trust, and reputation in multiple knowledge domains. The analysis clarifies these constructs as interwoven but individually influential factors shaping technology deployment and explores their interplay with public perception. A novel method is also introduced for generating indicative reputation scores derived from sentiment analysis. The findings show that AI-enhanced analytical tools, when integrated with established methods, yield valuable insights into stakeholder sentiment and public discourse. These insights can inform more targeted stakeholder engagement and strategic communication in waste management planning. Overall, the study demonstrates the potential of emerging analytical tools to produce timely, structured indicators of trust, acceptance, and reputation, key dimensions for navigating the socio-political challenges of technology deployment in the waste sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuortimo, Kalle & Härkönen, Janne & Breznik, Kristijan, 2026. "Waste management–related trust, acceptance, and reputation: A multidisciplinary big data analysis across knowledge domains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:225:y:2026:i:c:s0040162526000302
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162526000302
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cathrine Nagl, 2024. "Sentiment Analysis Within a Deep Learning Probabilistic Framework – New Evidence from Residential Real Estate in the United States," Journal of Housing Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 25-49, January.
    2. Yao, Emery & Fang, Ruolian & Dineen, Brian R. & Yao, Xin, 2009. "Effects of customer feedback level and (in)consistency on new product acceptance in the click-and-mortar context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 1281-1288, December.
    3. Kalle Nuortimo & Janne Harkonen, 2019. "Improving strategic decision making with big data-based media analysis - the case of coal power," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(3), pages 187-208.
    4. Upham, Paul & Shackley, Simon, 2006. "The case of a proposed 21.5 MWe biomass gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon: Implications for governance of renewable energy planning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(15), pages 2161-2172, October.
    5. Subhan Shahid, 2025. "Shadows of Corporate Social Responsibility: An Experimental Study on Intensity, Motives, and Legitimacy in Organizational Reputation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3495-3510, May.
    6. Gelashvili, Vera & Martínez-Navalón, Juan Gabriel & DeMatos, Nelson & de Brito Correia, Marisol, 2024. "Technological transformation: The importance of E-WOM and perceived privacy in the context of opinion platforms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Hammond, Geoffrey P. & O’Grady, Áine, 2017. "Indicative energy technology assessment of UK shale gas extraction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1907-1918.
    8. Timothy C. Earle, 2010. "Trust in Risk Management: A Model‐Based Review of Empirical Research," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 541-574, April.
    9. Bao, Haixu & Liu, Wenfei & Dai, Zheng, 2025. "Artificial intelligence vs. public administrators: Public trust, efficiency, and tolerance for errors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Adrian Rauchfleisch & Jo-Ju Kao & Tzu-Hsuan Tseng & Chia-Tzu Ho & Lu-Yi Li, 2023. "Maximizing Science Outreach on Facebook: An Analysis of Scientists’ Communication Strategies in Taiwan," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 228-239.
    11. Umar Farooq & Antoine Nongaillard & Yacine Ouzrout & Muhammad Abdul Qadir, 2016. "A Feature-Based Reputation Model for Product Evaluation," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1521-1553, November.
    12. D. Harrison McKnight & Vivek Choudhury & Charles Kacmar, 2002. "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 334-359, September.
    13. Joanna Ejdys, 2018. "Building technology trust in ICT application at a university," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(5), pages 980-997, November.
    14. Liu, Feng & Lyu, Tao & Pan, Li & Wang, Fei, 2017. "Influencing factors of public support for modern coal-fired power plant projects: An empirical study from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 398-406.
    15. Shakeel, Shah Rukh & Takala, Josu & Zhu, Lian-Dong, 2017. "Commercialization of renewable energy technologies: A ladder building approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 855-867.
    16. Mei Peng Low & Tat-Huei Cham & Yee-Shan Chang & Xin-Jean Lim, 2023. "Advancing on weighted PLS-SEM in examining the trust-based recommendation system in pioneering product promotion effectiveness," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 607-636, December.
    17. Wustenhagen, Rolf & Wolsink, Maarten & Burer, Mary Jean, 2007. "Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2683-2691, May.
    18. Johansen, Katinka, 2021. "Blowing in the wind: A brief history of wind energy and wind power technologies in Denmark," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    19. Majidi Nezhad, Meysam & Heydari, Azim & Neshat, Mehdi & Keynia, Farshid & Piras, Giuseppe & Garcia, Davide Astiaso, 2022. "A Mediterranean Sea Offshore Wind classification using MERRA-2 and machine learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 156-166.
    20. Makarichi, Luke & Jutidamrongphan, Warangkana & Techato, Kua-anan, 2018. "The evolution of waste-to-energy incineration: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 812-821.
    21. Serena Y. Kim & Koushik Ganesan & Princess Dickens & Soumya Panda, 2021. "Public Sentiment toward Solar Energy—Opinion Mining of Twitter Using a Transformer-Based Language Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    22. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    23. Yang, Zaoli & Li, Qin & Yan, Yamin & Shang, Wen-Long & Ochieng, Washington, 2022. "Examining influence factors of Chinese electric vehicle market demand based on online reviews under moderating effect of subsidy policy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    24. Kim, Byungjun & Yang, Soeun & Kim, Hana, 2024. "Voices of transitions: Korea's online news media and user comments on the energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    25. Edson Severnini, 2023. "The Power of Hydroelectric Dams: Historical Evidence from the United States over the Twentieth Century," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(649), pages 420-459.
    26. Adrian Rauchfleisch & Jo-Ju Kao & Tzu-Hsuan Tseng & Chia-Tzu Ho & Lu-Yi Li, 2023. "Maximizing Science Outreach on Facebook: An Analysis of Scientists’ Communication Strategies in Taiwan," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 228-239.
    27. Vaillancourt, Kathleen & Labriet, Maryse & Loulou, Richard & Waaub, Jean-Philippe, 2008. "The role of nuclear energy in long-term climate scenarios: An analysis with the World-TIMES model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2296-2307, July.
    28. Sangjae Lee & Joon Yeon Choeh, 2020. "Using the Social Influence of Electronic Word-of-Mouth for Predicting Product Sales: The Moderating Effect of Review or Reviewer Helpfulness and Product Type," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, September.
    29. Weber, Elke U. & Anderson, Carolyn J. & Birnbaum, Michael H., 1992. "A theory of perceived risk and attractiveness," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 492-523, August.
    30. Mark Booker Nielsen, 2022. "Identifying Challenges and Drivers for Deployment of Centralized Biogas Plants in Denmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-28, June.
    31. Krafft, Manfred & Sajtos, Laszlo & Haenlein, Michael, 2020. "Challenges and Opportunities for Marketing Scholars in Times of the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-8.
    32. Tiasha Islam & Murugesh Arunachalum & Nirosha Wellalage & Samuel Benjamin, 2025. "Corporate Environmental Performance Leading Financial Performance: Impacts of Social Media Sentiment and Corporate Reputation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 4274-4290, May.
    33. repec:plo:pone00:0238128 is not listed on IDEAS
    34. Lavaei Adaryani, Rasool & Palouj, Mojtaba & Karbasioun, Mostafa & Asadi, Ali & Gholami, Hesamedin & Kianirad, Ali & Joodi Damirchi, Milad, 2024. "Antecedents of blockchain adoption in the poultry supply chain: An extended UTAUT model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    35. Wang, Yanhong & Gong, Chen & Ji, Xiaodong & Yuan, Qi, 2025. "Text classification for evaluating digital technology adoption maturity based on BERT: An evidence of Industrial AI from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    36. Grazia Cecere & Nicoletta Corrocher & Cédric Gossart & Muge Ozman, 2014. "Lock-in and path dependence: an evolutionary approach to eco-innovations," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1037-1065, November.
    37. Koo, Chulmo & Chung, Namho, 2014. "Examining the eco-technological knowledge of Smart Green IT adoption behavior: A self-determination perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 140-155.
    38. Caferra, Rocco & D'Adamo, Idiano & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2023. "Wasting energy or energizing waste? The public acceptance of waste-to-energy technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    39. Nuortimo, Kalle & Härkönen, Janne & Karvonen, Erkki, 2018. "Exploring the global media image of solar power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2806-2811.
    40. Ozcan, Mustafa, 2016. "Estimation of Turkey׳s GHG emissions from electricity generation by fuel types," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 832-840.
    41. Weijie Tan & Edward Hengzhou Yan & Xihui Haviour Chen, 2025. "Positive Press, Greener Progress: The Role of ESG Media Reputation in Corporate Energy Innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 5162-5184, August.
    42. Eva A. M. van Dis & Johan Bollen & Willem Zuidema & Robert van Rooij & Claudi L. Bockting, 2023. "ChatGPT: five priorities for research," Nature, Nature, vol. 614(7947), pages 224-226, February.
    43. Heike Doering & James Downe & Hadar Elraz & Steve Martin, 2021. "Organizational identity threats and aspirations in reputation management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 376-396, March.
    44. Krishna, Ben & Puram, Praveen, 2025. "The impact of trust-based challenges on user satisfaction in food sharing platforms: A text mining approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    45. Khalid Alrashoud & Koji Tokimatsu, 2019. "Factors Influencing Social Perception of Residential Solar Photovoltaic Systems in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-22, September.
    46. Michael Siegrist & George Cvetkovich, 2000. "Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5), pages 713-720, October.
    47. Xu, Qianwen Ariel & Jayne, Chrisina & Chang, Victor, 2024. "An emoji feature-incorporated multi-view deep learning for explainable sentiment classification of social media reviews," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    48. Rongbin Yang & Santoso Wibowo, 2022. "User trust in artificial intelligence: A comprehensive conceptual framework," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2053-2077, December.
    49. Jiang, Kai & Ashworth, Peta & Zhang, Shiyi & Hu, Guoping, 2022. "Print media representations of carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) technology in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    50. Hirmer, Stephanie & Cruickshank, Heather, 2014. "Making the deployment of pico-PV more sustainable along the value chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 401-411.
    51. Rockstuhl, Sebastian & Wenninger, Simon & Wiethe, Christian & Häckel, Björn, 2021. "Understanding the risk perception of energy efficiency investments: Investment perspective vs. energy bill perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    52. Alessandro Muscio & Felice Simonelli & Hien Vu, 2023. "Bridging the valley of death in the EU renewable energy sector: Toward a new energy policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4620-4635, November.
    53. Sachs, Julia & Meng, Yiming & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam, 2019. "An agent-based model for energy investment decisions in the residential sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 752-768.
    54. Türker, Cansu & Altay, Burak Can & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2022. "Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    55. Daniel Hoornweg & Perinaz Bhada-Tata, 2012. "What a Waste : A Global Review of Solid Waste Management," World Bank Publications - Reports 17388, The World Bank Group.
    56. Sütterlin, Bernadette & Siegrist, Michael, 2017. "Public acceptance of renewable energy technologies from an abstract versus concrete perspective and the positive imagery of solar power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 356-366.
    57. Daly, Sarah J. & Wiewiora, Anna & Hearn, Greg, 2025. "Shifting attitudes and trust in AI: Influences on organizational AI adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    58. Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska, 2018. "An Empirical Analysis of Green Electricity Adoption Among Residential Consumers in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nuortimo, Kalle & Harkonen, Janne & Breznik, Kristijan, 2024. "Global, regional, and local acceptance of solar power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Ren, Jeana T., 2025. "Harnessing public sentiment: A literature review of sentiment analysis in energy research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Maketo, Lydia & Ashworth, Peta, 2025. "Social acceptance of green hydrogen in European Union and the United Kingdom: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    4. Schriever, Marlene & Halstrup, Dominik, 2018. "Exploring the adoption in transitioning markets: Empirical findings and implications on energy storage solutions-acceptance in the German manufacturing industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 460-468.
    5. Strazzera, Elisabetta & Meleddu, Daniela & Atzori, Rossella, 2022. "A hybrid choice modelling approach to estimate the trade-off between perceived environmental risks and economic benefits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    6. Schumacher, K. & Krones, F. & McKenna, R. & Schultmann, F., 2019. "Public acceptance of renewable energies and energy autonomy: A comparative study in the French, German and Swiss Upper Rhine region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 315-332.
    7. van den Berg, Kimo & Tempels, Barbara, 2022. "The role of community benefits in community acceptance of multifunctional solar farms in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    8. Park, Eunil & Ohm, Jay Y., 2014. "Factors influencing the public intention to use renewable energy technologies in South Korea: Effects of the Fukushima nuclear accident," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 198-211.
    9. Ioannidis, Romanos & Koutsoyiannis, Demetris, 2020. "A review of land use, visibility and public perception of renewable energy in the context of landscape impact," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    10. Evangelos Tsiaras & Stergios Tampekis & Costas Gavrilakis, 2025. "Public Perceptions and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Projects in Epirus, Greece: The Role of Education, Demographics and Visual Exposure," World, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Fang, Xingming & Wang, Lu & Sun, Chuanwang & Zheng, Xuemei & Wei, Jing, 2021. "Gap between words and actions: Empirical study on consistency of residents supporting renewable energy development in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    12. Zhou, Angela & Thomaschke, Roland & Wessels, Andreas & Glunz, Stefan & Speck, Thomas & Kiesel, Andrea, 2024. "(Not) in my city: An explorative study on social acceptance of photovoltaic installations on buildings," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Nahui Zhen & Jon Barnett & Michael Webber, 2020. "Is Trust Always a Precondition for Effective Water Resource Management?," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(4), pages 1423-1436, March.
    14. Sward, Jeffrey A. & Nilson, Roberta S. & Katkar, Venktesh V. & Stedman, Richard C. & Kay, David L. & Ifft, Jennifer E. & Zhang, K. Max, 2021. "Integrating social considerations in multicriteria decision analysis for utility-scale solar photovoltaic siting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    15. Hayashi, Reona & Kato, Ryutah & Watanabe, Rin & Kawaguchi, Hirofumi & Morikawa, So & Komatsuzaki, Shunsaku, 2026. "When economic incentives become repugnant: Moderating roles of construction probability and initial acceptance in high-level radioactive waste siting," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 209(PB).
    16. Burghard, Uta & Dütschke, Elisabeth & Caldes, Natalia & Oltra, Christian, 2022. "Cross-border concentrated solar power projects - opportunity or dead end? A study into actor views in Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    17. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Obuobi, Bright & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Adjei, Mavis & Cudjoe, Dan, 2022. "Citizens' willingness to pay for local anaerobic digestion energy: The influence of altruistic value and knowledge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    18. Chandan Kumar Behera & Ritika Dadra, 2024. "Understanding young consumers’ attitude formation for new-age fintech credit products: an SOR framework perspective," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 964-978, September.
    19. Kallbekken, Steffen & Skjeflo, Sofie Waage & Westberg, Nina Bruvik & Jåstad, Eirik Ogner, 2025. "Green dilemmas: Public opposition and support for Norway's energy transition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    20. Younès Boughzala & Inès Bouzid & Imed Boughzala, 2012. "Les déterminants de l'adoption de l'e-achat public en France : une étude qualitative auprès des praticiens," Post-Print hal-02408949, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:225:y:2026:i:c:s0040162526000302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.