IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i3p3495-3510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shadows of Corporate Social Responsibility: An Experimental Study on Intensity, Motives, and Legitimacy in Organizational Reputation

Author

Listed:
  • Subhan Shahid

Abstract

The study examines when and how corporate social responsibility (CSR) intensity (high vs. low) leads to higher perceived organizational reputation. Drawing on stakeholder theory, the study also theorizes the mediating role of perceived organizational legitimacy and the moderating role of CSR motives (strategic vs. altruistic). Two studies, using a 2 × 2 between‐subject experimental design, are empirically tested using analysis of variance and Process macro moderated mediation analysis. Findings affirm that high CSR intensity leads to higher perceived organizational reputation via perceived organizational legitimacy. Additionally, the study demonstrates that altruistic CSR motives significantly strengthen the relationship between CSR intensity and positive stakeholder perceptions, compared with strategically driven motives. This finding offers essential empirical evidence regarding the impact of CSR implementation, shedding light on the psychological processes that stakeholders engage in when evaluating an organization's legitimacy and reputation. By focusing on how these cognitive assessments are formed, the research deepens our understanding of the nuanced role CSR motives play in shaping stakeholder perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Subhan Shahid, 2025. "Shadows of Corporate Social Responsibility: An Experimental Study on Intensity, Motives, and Legitimacy in Organizational Reputation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3495-3510, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:3495-3510
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.3139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.3139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:3495-3510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.