IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v219y2025ics1364032125004125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harnessing public sentiment: A literature review of sentiment analysis in energy research

Author

Listed:
  • Ren, Jeana T.

Abstract

Public opinion is of great importance for the successful implementation of energy projects. Traditional methods for gauging this sentiment, however, are limited in scalability and reproducibility over time. This paper reviews the application of sentiment analysis in energy research, highlighting its potential to overcome these limitations by providing large-scale, quantifiable data across diverse energy technologies and geographies. By showcasing integrations of sentiment analysis with topic modeling, this review showcases approaches that enhance the understanding of public opinions and support more informed policy-making. This paper finds that researchers have leveraged a wide range of data sources, including social media, news reports, research papers, and transcripts of interviews and speeches, but have often relied on suboptimal models to perform the sentiment classification. In line with existing literature, our quantitative model comparison indicates that transformer-based and large language model approaches can improve classification accuracy by up to 20% compared to traditional lexicon-based methods. In particular, this study is the first to compare GPT model performance in an energy context. To support future research, this review provides practical guidance on model selection in sentiment analysis, lowering the technical barrier to adoption. By encouraging broader use of sentiment analysis, this work aims to improve public response forecasting, facilitating the development of more effective energy policies and advancing energy technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren, Jeana T., 2025. "Harnessing public sentiment: A literature review of sentiment analysis in energy research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:219:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125004125
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125004125
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115739?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:219:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125004125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.