IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v81y2025ics0160791x25000235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining a conjoint experiment and machine learning model to include end-users in a constructive technology assessment: The case of seasonal thermal energy storage

Author

Listed:
  • Zumofen, Guillaume

Abstract

By definition, the mapping of technological development occurs in the context of uncertainty and with a risk of failure. Decisions taken at the onset of the development phase are significant because the technology has not reached the market yet. The technology loses its malleability during the development phase because of entrenchment. Thus, the objective of a constructive technological assessment is to embed social aspects – additional perspectives – in the context of technological developments. In line with extant literature, a pivotal perspective is the (future) end-user of the technology. Hence, market acceptance remains a constraining factor in technological development, notably for renewable energy technology. However, existing studies have not included (future) end-users in development phases. They have always taken place after the technology has reached the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Zumofen, Guillaume, 2025. "Combining a conjoint experiment and machine learning model to include end-users in a constructive technology assessment: The case of seasonal thermal energy storage," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000235
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000235
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102833?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.